| O.J. Simpson The criminal and civil trials of OJ Simpson in the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. |
|

06-29-2009, 03:56 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7
|
|
Your Standpoint
Hi everyone.
This is my first post here.. I´ve been searching for a place to discuss and read about the O.J. case (94-95) and I am glad to have found it.
First of all I´d like to get everybody´s standpoint...
Guilty or Not Guilty?
/windh
|
|

06-29-2009, 08:07 PM
|
|
On Vacation
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,479
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by windh
hi everyone.
This is my first post here.. I´ve been searching for a place to discuss and read about the o.j. Case (94-95) and i am glad to have found it.
First of all i´d like to get everybody´s standpoint...
Guilty or not guilty?
/windh
|
guilty, guilty, guilty
|
|

06-30-2009, 12:23 AM
|
 |
Criime Library Supreme Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,622
|
|
|
Guilty.
__________________
“Truth will always be truth, regardless of lack of understanding, disbelief or ignorance.” W. Clement Stone
|
|

06-30-2009, 05:21 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 749
|
|
|
Guilty.
I think the prosecuation deliberately threw the case to avoid rioting were he found guilty.
|
|

07-18-2009, 09:10 PM
|
 |
Criime Library Supreme Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,622
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marian Paroo
Guilty.
I think the prosecuation deliberately threw the case to avoid rioting were he found guilty.
|
That's an interesting theory. I think they just go in way over their heads and weren't prepared for the lengths the defense would go to for an acquittal.
__________________
“Truth will always be truth, regardless of lack of understanding, disbelief or ignorance.” W. Clement Stone
|
|

07-19-2009, 12:12 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 749
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tvdinner
That's an interesting theory. I think they just go in way over their heads and weren't prepared for the lengths the defense would go to for an acquittal.
|
I think they were given orders from up high to throw the case -- state was afraid of riots were Simpson found guilty.
I'll be glad to expand on that but here in Israel, work week is Sunday-Thursday, so I gotta be leaving for work -- it's 07:12 am.
|
|

07-19-2009, 12:29 AM
|
 |
Criime Library Supreme Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,622
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marian Paroo
I think they were given orders from up high to throw the case -- state was afraid of riots were Simpson found guilty.
I'll be glad to expand on that but here in Israel, work week is Sunday-Thursday, so I gotta be leaving for work -- it's 07:12 am.
|
Have a good day at work! Get back to us when you can.
__________________
“Truth will always be truth, regardless of lack of understanding, disbelief or ignorance.” W. Clement Stone
|
|

07-19-2009, 06:29 PM
|
 |
Criime Library Supreme Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 17,779
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tvdinner
That's an interesting theory. I think they just go in way over their heads and weren't prepared for the lengths the defense would go to for an acquittal.
|
The prosecution had five times the resources as the defence.They prosecute cases every day. How is it that they would not be prepared for another murder case? The prosecution had one big problem which they only realized half way through the case. They had a weak case and was up against surerior lawyering by the defence.
Unlike most cases they were forced to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt and they failed.imo
|
|

07-19-2009, 07:31 PM
|
 |
Criime Library Supreme Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,622
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by martin II
The prosecution had five times the resources as the defence.They prosecute cases every day. How is it that they would not be prepared for another murder case? The prosecution had one big problem which they only realized half way through the case. They had a weak case and was up against surerior lawyering by the defence.
Unlike most cases they were forced to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt and they failed.imo
|
I'm not sure about having five times the resources as the defense. They were prepared for the case but not the way the defense was willing to conduct Simpson's defense. The case was not weak. Can you tell me which part of it was weak?
__________________
“Truth will always be truth, regardless of lack of understanding, disbelief or ignorance.” W. Clement Stone
|
|

07-19-2009, 08:09 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 214
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tvdinner
I'm not sure about having five times the resources as the defense. They were prepared for the case but not the way the defense was willing to conduct Simpson's defense. The case was not weak. Can you tell me which part of it was weak?
|
The prosecution didn't have a weak case but they had a very strong one.
The blood, the hairs and the fibers tell most that O.J. is guilty of the murders of Nicole and Ron.
|
|

07-19-2009, 08:13 PM
|
 |
Criime Library Supreme Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,622
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hipcheck
The prosecution didn't have a weak case but they had a very strong one.
The blood, the hairs and the fibers tell most that O.J. is guilty of the murders of Nicole and Ron.
|
I agree 100%. I've never understood what some people thought was weak about their case but I'm hoping martin will tell us.
__________________
“Truth will always be truth, regardless of lack of understanding, disbelief or ignorance.” W. Clement Stone
|
|

08-22-2009, 03:19 PM
|
 |
Criime Library Supreme Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: love everlasting
Posts: 18,352
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marian Paroo
Guilty.
I think the prosecuation deliberately threw the case to avoid rioting were he found guilty.
|
Are we now accusing the prosecution of abuse of the system and prosecutorial misconduct?
__________________
Doc Holiday
The best way to win a war is to not fight one. To be able to acknowledge when we are wrong, helps us to get it right, imho. A receptive mind and open heart will allow you to go further than you dreamed. When justice stands still, only the fool hearted, will contemplate pursuing even the most just of causes. Sometimes being disrespected is the price one pays for stating an unpopular but truthful event.
|
|

08-22-2009, 04:52 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 749
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by William Anthony
Are we now accusing the prosecution of abuse of the system and prosecutorial misconduct?
|
I think the orders came from higher up.
|
|

08-22-2009, 04:56 PM
|
 |
Criime Library Supreme Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: love everlasting
Posts: 18,352
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marian Paroo
I think the orders came from higher up.
|
You may be correct but that does not negate the duty the prosecution undertook. What I am saying is that the theory is interesting and admits that there was reasonable doubt, for whatever reason, in the prosecution's case. If the theory is correct, the prosecution could have been brought up on charges, IMHO.
__________________
Doc Holiday
The best way to win a war is to not fight one. To be able to acknowledge when we are wrong, helps us to get it right, imho. A receptive mind and open heart will allow you to go further than you dreamed. When justice stands still, only the fool hearted, will contemplate pursuing even the most just of causes. Sometimes being disrespected is the price one pays for stating an unpopular but truthful event.
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 PM.
|
|
Advertisement
|