I couldn't resist...

[samanthajane13]

I know I'm bad.

I saw it and had to share.

[FDInLaw]

I know I shouldn't be laughing. . . but I am lol!

[weezer]

I bet the accommodations are at least as good as the 'seedy hotel room' the defense lawyers kept referring to

[Mac]

Now all the citizens of Nevada get to pay to give him medical, meals ,lodging, etc. Unless he happens to get into the prison population. G-D forbid!


By the way...that picture was funny, I don't care who you are!!!

[martin II]

looking at the defense

[William Anthony]

Originally Posted by martin II

looking at the defense

Judge Judie Glass at her finest.

[tv]

Originally Posted by William Anthony

Judge Judie Glass at her finest.

You really have a personal problem with Judge Glass...hmm...

[William Anthony]

Originally Posted by tvdinner

You really have a personal problem with Judge Glass...hmm...

Nothing personal-don't know her and I do have a problem with male judges that act in that manner. Judge Joe Brown sometimes has his moments but his comments are usually more humorous. I think that both Judge Judies play to the camera.

[Kayleighjo]

Originally Posted by William Anthony

Judge Judie Glass at her finest.

I think I've figured out martin's main problem with this case though-he's alot like O.J. and couldn't stand the fact that a WOMAN was actually dictating to the Juice.

[tv]

Originally Posted by William Anthony

Nothing personal-don't know her and I do have a problem with male judges that act in that manner. Judge Joe Brown sometimes has his moments but his comments are usually more humorous. I think that both Judge Judies play to the camera.

I didn't see Judge Jackie Glass act in any manner. What exactly did she do that you don't approve of?

[tv]

Originally Posted by Kayleighjo

I think I've figured out martin's main problem with this case though-he's alot like O.J. and couldn't stand the fact that a WOMAN was actually dictating to the Juice.

Exactly, and a white woman at that.

[William Anthony]

Originally Posted by tvdinner

I didn't see Judge Jackie Glass act in any manner. What exactly did she do that you don't approve of?

I think it was blatantly obvious the way she acted toward the defense. I think, IIRC, that Galanter said at some point that he was afraid her actions would be imparted to his client.

[William Anthony]

Originally Posted by Kayleighjo

I think I've figured out martin's main problem with this case though-he's alot like O.J. and couldn't stand the fact that a WOMAN was actually dictating to the Juice.

I think Martin is old enough to know that you women will try that all the time.
I always tell women with whom I am in a relationship that the can run two things-their shoes over (well, I guess that negates a relationship with one) and their mouths. This is all just a joke but I do tell them that. I don't like that competition thing.

[martin II]

Originally Posted by martin II

looking at the defense

Sit down Galanter i don't give a S*** what you want to say.

[tv]

Originally Posted by William Anthony

I think it was blatantly obvious the way she acted toward the defense. I think, IIRC, that Galanter said at some point that he was afraid her actions would be imparted to his client.

Of course Gallanter said that. It was so he could go back at a later date and accuse her of misconduct. I've come to believe that Gallanter isn't the brightest crayon in the box because of some of the things he focused on during the trial.

What are some specific examples of impropriety from her toward the defense? I'd seriously like to know.

[tv]

Originally Posted by William Anthony

I think Martin is old enough to know that you women will try that all the time.
I always tell women with whom I am in a relationship that the can run two things-their shoes over (well, I guess that negates a relationship with one) and their mouths. This is all just a joke but I do tell them that. I don't like that competition thing.

Does Ms Chi know about these relationships?

[martin II]

Originally Posted by William Anthony

I think Martin is old enough to know that you women will try that all the time.
I always tell women with whom I am in a relationship that the can run two things-their shoes over (well, I guess that negates a relationship with one) and their mouths. This is all just a joke but I do tell them that. I don't like that competition thing.

Martin is wise enough to recognize a bitter dog looser when he sees one and knows that he likes the variety of the chocolate ones.

[William Anthony]

Originally Posted by tvdinner

Of course Gallanter said that. It was so he could go back at a later date and accuse her of misconduct. I've come to believe that Gallanter isn't the brightest crayon in the box because of some of the things he focused on during the trial.

What are some specific examples of impropriety from her toward the defense? I'd seriously like to know.

I did not tape this trial and don't have the transcripts but did watch and saw her demeanor when interacting with the defense and, specifically, yelling to Galanter to sit down.

[martin II]

Originally Posted by tvdinner

of course gallanter said that. It was so he could go back at a later date and accuse her of misconduct. I've come to believe that gallanter isn't the brightest crayon in the box because of some of the things he focused on during the trial.

What are some specific examples of impropriety from her toward the defense? I'd seriously like to know.

baiting

[William Anthony]

Originally Posted by tvdinner

Does Ms Chi know about these relationships?

I was very much a man when I met her and told her that I was slightly used but still in very good condition. We married. Does your wonderful husband know about your strolls on the NC beaches?

[tv]

Originally Posted by William Anthony

I did not tape this trial and don't have the transcripts but did watch and saw her demeanor when interacting with the defense and, specifically, yelling to Galanter to sit down.

Judge Ito yelled at the prosecution in the criminal trial all the time and even attempted to humilate Chris Darden at one point which was very uncomfortable to watch. Not only that -- he allowed the trial within a trial to turn the whole thing into a three-ring circus. I haven't seen you complain about him. Oh, that's right -- Simpson was aquitted in that trial.

[Kayleighjo]

Originally Posted by martin II

Martin is wise enough to recognize a bitter dog looser when he sees one and knows that he likes the variety of the chocolate ones.

What's a "looser"?

[tv]

Originally Posted by William Anthony

I was very much a man when I met her and told her that I was slightly used but still in very good condition. We married. Does your wonderful husband know about your strolls on the NC beaches?

Unless early Alzheimers has set in, considering my strolls were with him, I would imagine he remembers them well.

[Kayleighjo]

Originally Posted by tvdinner

Judge Ito yelled at the prosecution in the criminal trial all the time and even attempted to humilate Chris Darden at one point which was very uncomfortable to watch. Not only that -- he allowed the trial within a trial to turn the whole thing into a three-ring circus. I haven't seen you complain about him. Oh, that's right -- Simpson was aquitted in that trial.

[William Anthony]

Originally Posted by tvdinner

Judge Ito yelled at the prosecution in the criminal trial all the time and even attempted to humilate Chris Darden at one point which was very uncomfortable to watch. Not only that -- he allowed the trial within a trial to turn the whole thing into a three-ring circus. I haven't seen you complain about him. Oh, that's right -- Simpson was aquitted in that trial.

Ito was stern with both sides, imho. Darden brought that on himself, if we are talking about the same incident.

[William Anthony]

Originally Posted by tvdinner

Unless early Alzheimers has set in, considering my strolls were with him, I would imagine he remembers them well.

I talking about the ones you did not tell him about. You know when you had to carry that stick. Was he not there to run them off?

[martin II]

Originally Posted by William Anthony

I did not tape this trial and don't have the transcripts but did watch and saw her demeanor when interacting with the defense and, specifically, yelling to Galanter to sit down.

The Washington Post put the above picture at the top of a story to show her negative demeanor towards the defense.

[tv]

Originally Posted by William Anthony

Ito was stern with both sides, imho. Darden brought that on himself, if we are talking about the same incident.

No, Darden did not bring that on himself. He interrupted Johnny Cochran during a side bar and was still talking when Judge Ito told him to be quiet. Judge Ito told him he had to apologize to the court and he fined the DA's office. What a display of monumental ego that only served to undermine the prosecution's image.

[tv]

Originally Posted by William Anthony

I talking about the ones you did not tell him about. You know when you had to carry that stick. Was he not there to run them off?

That was only a joke as I thought you realized at the time. I've never hit threatened or hit anyone with a stick. I'm surprised you'd think such a thing of me.

[William Anthony]

Originally Posted by tvdinner

No, Darden did not bring that on himself. He interrupted Johnny Cochran during a side bar and was still talking when Judge Ito told him to be quiet. Judge Ito told him he had to apologize to the court and he fined the DA's office. What a display of monumental ego that only served to undermine the prosecution's image.

He did more than that. I do not think the jury was present when Darden stood there pouting and Clark tried to intervene.

[Kayleighjo]

Originally Posted by tvdinner

No, Darden did not bring that on himself. He interrupted Johnny Cochran during a side bar and was still talking when Judge Ito told him to be quiet. Judge Ito told him he had to apologize to the court and he fined the DA's office. What a display of monumental ego that only served to undermine the prosecution's image.

It wasn't even that he interrupted Cochran. Ito made a rule that only one attorney was allowed to speak at sidebar. It was Clark that was supposed to do the talking and when Darden spoke Ito was pissed. I agreed with Darden. Cochran shouldn't have been saying what he said either-"they obviously don't know how to try a case" or something to that effect, which was what made Darden angry in the first place.

[martin II]

Originally Posted by William Anthony

I talking about the ones you did not tell him about. You know when you had to carry that stick. Was he not there to run them off?

Kinda like heavily used and banged up.

[Kayleighjo]

Originally Posted by William Anthony

He did more than that. I do not think the jury was present when Darden stood there pouting and Clark tried to intervene.

You saw that as pouting? Really? Did you see it as inappropriate when Cochran said in the presence of the jury that the prosecution obviously didn't know how to try a case?

[William Anthony]

Originally Posted by tvdinner

That was only a joke as I thought you realized at the time. I've never hit threatened or hit anyone with a stick. I'm surprised you'd think such a thing of me.

I would not put it pass you and would like a recent picture of you so I will know when I am in danger. He was your first, your last, your everything....

[William Anthony]

Originally Posted by Kayleighjo

It wasn't even that he interrupted Cochran. Ito made a rule that only one attorney was allowed to speak at sidebar. It was Clark that was supposed to do the talking and when Darden spoke Ito was pissed. I agreed with Darden. Cochran shouldn't have been saying what he said either-"they obviously don't know how to try a case" or something to that effect, which was what made Darden angry in the first place.

The proof is in the pudding.

[William Anthony]

Originally Posted by Kayleighjo

You saw that as pouting? Really? Did you see it as inappropriate when Cochran said in the presence of the jury that the prosecution obviously didn't know how to try a case?

I saw it as him representing the truth and an offer to assist.

[Kayleighjo]

Originally Posted by William Anthony

I saw it as him representing the truth and an offer to assist.

That's pretty sad and disappointing. But at least I'm learning that you'll never admit anything negative toward any defense counsel of Simpson. Your bias shows heavily.

[William Anthony]

Originally Posted by martin II

Kinda like heavily used and banged up.

Well I might have underestimated my experiences a tad bit but I was still in very good shape.

[weezer]

Originally Posted by martin II

Martin is wise enough to recognize a bitter dog looser when he sees one and knows that he likes the variety of the chocolate ones.

does every dadgum post of yours has to be so hateful?

[William Anthony]

Originally Posted by Kayleighjo

That's pretty sad and disappointing. But at least I'm learning that you'll never admit anything negative toward any defense counsel of Simpson. Your bias shows heavily.

I don't know why it disappoints you. All of the lawyers took their shots at each other. It is a tactic used to rattle the opponent. The judge on the other hand should maintain an air of impartiality. Objections are placed tactically to interrupt the flow. This was just another tactic and, if it rattled Darden, then he did not know how to try a case.