Quote:
Originally Posted by judi25uk
yeah! he seems so cold devoid of emotion. i dont know a massive great deal but do you know if entwistle claimed he found the bodies then covered them in blankets and then fled to england? i know there was evidence to suggest he had broken into his father in laws house to take the gun and then replace it. its just bizarre and the more i think about it the more questions i seem to have. The report about fathers murdering their families on CL is a really good article have you read it?
|
I didn't follow the trial in detail but kind of picked up the reports after he was found guilty. There was something about him returning the gun to the FIL's house and the baby's face was covered - they claimed he'd done that because he couldn't bear to look at her face whilst he murdered her.
There was something about there being gun residue (or some kind of evidence pertaining to the gun) on the wife's hand and that was what Entwhistle's mother was ranting about when she was claiming her son was "innocent". I always find it a bit irritating when someone says that a convicted or suspected murderer is "innocent" when that person wasn't there at the time of the murder. I think - well they are claiming something as fact that they cannot possibly know for certain so I don't trust this person! It's quite another thing if a person says something like "I absolutely believe 100% that so and so is innocent of this crime..."
Just a little bugbear of mine - it reminds me of used car salesman talk!