And here's the rebuttal to Franklin's editorial:
Craig Franklin never dreamed he’d be writing a feature story for the Christian Science Monitor, just as Reed Walters never expected to see his name gracing the pages of the New York Times Op-Ed page.
There is an old rule in journalism; when you can’t wring another drop of juice out of a story, flip the script–tell the world the press has been getting it wrong. Telling the “real story” about Jena has become a cottage industry.
“Jena” has always been a disagreement between Alan Bean and Craig Franklin, co-editor of the Jena Times. Craig and his father, Sammy Franklin devoted several gallons of ink to the noose incident and the arrest and prosecution of the Jena 6. My “Responding to the Crisis in Jena, Louisiana” narrative owed much to the copious detail of their reporting. The Franklins publish a first class small-town newspaper.
Those of you who have been reading my posts won’t need to read Franklin’s deathless prose (you’ve heard it all before) or my responses (I will touch on a few new issues, but not many). But if you are new to this debate, this back-and-forth discussion should proove instructive. My comments appear in italics.
Media myths about the Jena 6
A local journalist tells the story you haven’t heard.
By Craig Franklin
Jena, La.
By now, almost everyone in America has heard of Jena, La., because they’ve all heard the story of the “Jena 6.” White students hanging nooses barely punished, a schoolyard fight, excessive punishment for the six black attackers, racist local officials, public outrage and protests – the outside media made sure everyone knew the basics.
There’s just one problem: The media got most of the basics wrong. In fact, I have never before witnessed such a disgrace in professional journalism. Myths replaced facts, and journalists abdicated their solemn duty to investigate every claim because they were seduced by a powerfully appealing but false narrative of racial injustice.
I would suggest that coverage of the march to Iraq would constitute a much more serious media meltdown. As you will see from later comments, most of the “myths” Franklin addresses rarely appear in mainstream reporting. Howard Witt of the Chicago Tribune, the first mainstream journalist to cover the story on the national level, spent a week in Jena before writing a word. Dozens of reporters have followed in his footsteps (to the point where overwhelmed Jena residents refuse to comment) and most of them have been equally careful.
I should know. I live in Jena. My wife has taught at Jena High School for many years. And most important, I am probably the only reporter who has covered these events from the very beginning.
Actually, Abbey Brown of the Alexandria TownTalk and Tony Brown, an Alexandria journalist and talk show host, have given careful attention to this story from the day nooses appeared on a tree at the high school.
The reason the Jena cases have been propelled into the world spotlight is two-fold: First, because local officials did not speak publicly early on about the true events of the past year, the media simply formed their stories based on one-side’s statements – the Jena 6. Second, the media were downright lazy in their efforts to find the truth. Often, they simply reported what they’d read on blogs, which expressed only one side of the issue.
Few mainstream reporters have repeated blog gossip–they prefer to copy one another.
Continued:
http://friendsofjustice.wordpress.co...ing-attention/
Linear Mode
