OJ's New Book - Part 2

[Riviera]

Continue here ---->

[WarmNCozy]

There are people who believe OJ innocent! We are entitled to our opinion! I would hope you would respect that opinion as I would yours to disagree!

[jotun]

Originally Posted by WarmNCozy

There are people who believe OJ innocent! We are entitled to our opinion! I would hope you would respect that opinion as I would yours to disagree!

WarmNcozy

OFF-TOPIC

There are millions of US who believe O.J. IS INNOCENT. But few of THEM would ever respect that. Always making nasty remarks & questioning the intelligence of US etc. Notice few of US respond in kind, don't feel the need. Try to ignore THEM.

ALL---Could, US & THEM keep this new thread ON-TOPIC????

O.J.'s New Book.

IMO

jotun

[socaldiva]

Interesting that your post starts with "Off Topic" & ends with a request to keep it "on topic" & everything in between could have been sent in a PM, being that it's just personal commentary on other posters

[weezer]

Originally Posted by socaldiva

Interesting that your post starts with "Off Topic" & ends with a request to keep it "on topic" & everything in between could have been sent in a PM, being that it's just personal commentary on other posters

LOL -- everybody else stay on topic BUT me! LOL

[martin II]

if i did it

# 45 B&N
# 13 NYT LIST

[socaldiva]

Originally Posted by martin II

if i did it

# 45 B&N
# 13 NYT LIST

Far better sales than Orenthal's "I Want To Tell You"

[socaldiva]

In case anyone is interested in watching, Fred & Kim Goldman & Pablo F. will be on Dr Phil today discussing the book.

[tv]

Originally Posted by socaldiva

In case anyone is interested in watching, Fred & Kim Goldman & Pablo F. will be on Dr Phil today discussing the book.

Thanks, diva! I'm definitely interested.

[weezer]

Originally Posted by socaldiva

In case anyone is interested in watching, Fred & Kim Goldman & Pablo F. will be on Dr Phil today discussing the book.

thanks for the heads-up socal!

[socaldiva]

You're welcome ladies. It should be interesting, especially with the ghost writer on.

Off to work

[martin II]

if i did it
B&n 74
NYT #13

[socaldiva]

I just finished watching the Dr Phil interview & heard something I'd not heard before. Kim said that when the criminal verdict was read relative to her brother, Cochran looked over at her & smiled & said "got ya"! What a vile little man

[Wukong]

I stumbled in here and saw OJ Nut is still posting. I also noticed his little signature line at the bottom of his post and it is wrong, just like everything else he posts:

"Some want to believe that O.J. gave the victims those
'COLUMBIAN NECKLACES' "

A columbian necklace is a rubber tire full of gasoline placed over someone's head, around their neck, and lit on fire.

I believe OJ Nut means a "Colombian Necktie". This is where the victims neck is slit from ear to ear and their tongue pulled out the hole to hang down in front like a necktie.

Sorry for the way off topic rant, but I found it so in character for OJ the nut and I couldn't help pointing it out.

[martin II]

Originally Posted by Wukong

I stumbled in here and saw OJ Nut is still posting. I also noticed his little signature line at the bottom of his post and it is wrong, just like everything else he posts:

"Some want to believe that O.J. gave the victims those
'COLUMBIAN NECKLACES' "

A columbian necklace is a rubber tire full of gasoline placed over someone's head, around their neck, and lit on fire.

I believe OJ Nut means a "Colombian Necktie". This is where the victims neck is slit from ear to ear and their tongue pulled out the hole to hang down in front like a necktie.

Sorry for the way off topic rant, but I found it so in character for OJ the nut and I couldn't help pointing it out.

martin II

[Jayme K]

Originally Posted by martin II

martin II

Oh please.

[tv]

Originally Posted by Wukong

I stumbled in here and saw OJ Nut is still posting. I also noticed his little signature line at the bottom of his post and it is wrong, just like everything else he posts:

"Some want to believe that O.J. gave the victims those
'COLUMBIAN NECKLACES' "

A columbian necklace is a rubber tire full of gasoline placed over someone's head, around their neck, and lit on fire.

I believe OJ Nut means a "Colombian Necktie". This is where the victims neck is slit from ear to ear and their tongue pulled out the hole to hang down in front like a necktie.

Sorry for the way off topic rant, but I found it so in character for OJ the nut and I couldn't help pointing it out.

Thanks, Wukong. That "Columbian Necklace" signature has been bugging me for a long time.

[tv]

Originally Posted by socaldiva

You're welcome ladies. It should be interesting, especially with the ghost writer on.

Off to work

So what did you think of their appearance on Dr. Phil? It's obvious their grief is very sincere. I thought they were very kind to Denise Brown in their comments.

IMO, Dr. Phil and the ghostwriter have OJ Simpson's motive and guilt figured out. It was an interesting hour.

[WarmNCozy]

Originally Posted by tvdinner

So what did you think of their appearance on Dr. Phil? It's obvious their grief is very sincere. I thought they were very kind to Denise Brown in their comments.

IMO, Dr. Phil and the ghostwriter have OJ Simpson's motive and guilt figured out. It was an interesting hour.

And very one sided! Dr. Phil is a joke!

[martin II]

Is Dr Phil the guy that is being sued for playing a doctored tape on his show in the Hollaway case? Or is there two Dr Phils?

MARTIN ii

[socaldiva]

Originally Posted by WarmNCozy

And very one sided! Dr. Phil is a joke!

"One sided"? Who did you expect to see for balance? Orenthal was there, it was just in book form. It was his story that was read & spoken of.

If "Dr Phil is a joke", does that mean that you didn't watch the show in question? How can you possibly judge, if you didn't see it?

[socaldiva]

Originally Posted by martin II

Is Dr Phil the guy that is being sued for playing a doctored tape on his show in the Hollaway case? Or is there two Dr Phils?

MARTIN ii

One of the ex-suspects in the Natalee Holloway filed a lawsuit in December claiming a tape was doctored. I have not heard that they won the lawsuit, have you? Oprah was sued, yet you don't seem to hold her to the same standard. Why is that? btw: Dr Phil isn't the only tv host that thinks Orenthal is guilty, Oprah does too.

[socaldiva]

Originally Posted by tvdinner

So what did you think of their appearance on Dr. Phil? It's obvious their grief is very sincere. I thought they were very kind to Denise Brown in their comments.

IMO, Dr. Phil and the ghostwriter have OJ Simpson's motive and guilt figured out. It was an interesting hour.

I thought it was a very compelling hour & I agree with you, their grief is very sincere & heartfelt. It was so sad to hear them talk about the specifics of the crimes inflicted upon Ron, as read from the book & to see Kim sit with a box on her lap, looking at pictures of Ron. I thought it was facinating to have Pablo F. tell his tale. I usually don't watch Dr Phil, but I think he had OJ pegged! Looks like Martin doesn't have to worry about Fred's mental health. He's now seen a psychologist & Dr Phil commends Fred's efforts & said Ron would be proud

[tv]

Originally Posted by socaldiva

I thought it was a very compelling hour & I agree with you, their grief is very sincere & heartfelt. It was so sad to hear them talk about the specifics of the crimes inflicted upon Ron, as read from the book & to see Kim sit with a box on her lap, looking at pictures of Ron. I thought it was facinating to have Pablo F. tell his tale. I usually don't watch Dr Phil, but I think he had OJ pegged! Looks like Martin doesn't have to worry about Fred's mental health. He's now seen a psychologist & Dr Phil commends Fred's efforts & said Ron would be proud

I'd like to hear more from Pablo F. He was very interesting and I think he has a lot more insight into OJ Simpson that he could talk about. Hopefully, it will all eventually come out. It was fascinating when he was saying that Simpson kept slipping out of the hypothetical mode and was talking as if he was really at the crime scene. Like Dr. Phil said, only someone actually present would think to add or know all those small details. Also, Fred Goldman said he knew some people characterize his efforts as blood money but the real blood money was given to OJ Simpson for writing the book in the first place. Exactly!

[tv]

Originally Posted by martin II

Is Dr Phil the guy that is being sued for playing a doctored tape on his show in the Hollaway case? Or is there two Dr Phils?

MARTIN ii

Your man Simpson has been sued and found liable for a wrongful death but that doesn't seem to bother you. Or am I wrong? Are there two OJ Simpsons that killed two human beings?

[martin II]

Originally Posted by tvdinner

I'd like to hear more from Pablo F. He was very interesting and I think he has a lot more insight into OJ Simpson that he could talk about. Hopefully, it will all eventually come out. It was fascinating when he was saying that Simpson kept slipping out of the hypothetical mode and was talking as if he was really at the crime scene. Like Dr. Phil said, only someone actually present would think to add or know all those small details. Also, Fred Goldman said he knew some people characterize his efforts as blood money but the real blood money was given to OJ Simpson for writing the book in the first place. Exactly!

TV
I think that anyone with access to all the court records could have created a "hypothetical" acount of the murder scene that would have been more informative and entertaining than the one that Pablo and oj created.

I also noticed that Pablo had nothing to say about oj or the book during the time that he acted as ghost writter and when fred was fighting HC for the rights. He only decided to speak when the details of the money he received and is yet to receive came out during the bankruptcy activity.He is just now jumping ship to be on the side of public opinion and get a few moments in the spotlight by saying he had nothing to do with the content of the book.

If he had nothing to do with the contents, why is he listed to get $300,000
as a LBA creditor.
He is also the guy that testified to a time of hearing the dog bark which agreed with M Clarke which was destroyed by Heidstras and other testimony.

Dr Phil has never treated OJ as far as i know So i don't know if he was speaking professionally or just speaking as another TH.
all my opinion

martin II

[tv]

Originally Posted by martin II

TV
I think that anyone with access to all the court records could have created a "hypothetical" acount of the murder scene that would have been more informative and entertaining than the one that Pablo and oj created.

I also noticed that Pablo had nothing to say about oj or the book during the time that he acted as ghost writter and when fred was fighting HC for the rights. He only decided to speak when the details of the money he received and is yet to receive came out during the bankruptcy activity.He is just now jumping ship to be on the side of public opinion and get a few moments in the spotlight by saying he had nothing to do with the content of the book.

If he had nothing to do with the contents, why is he listed to get $300,000
as a LBA creditor.
He is also the guy that testified to a time of hearing the dog bark which agreed with M Clarke which was destroyed by Heidstras and other testimony.

Dr Phil has never treated OJ as far as i know So i don't know if he was speaking professionally or just speaking as another TH.
all my opinion

martin II

Now you're attacking the ghostwriter?

[socaldiva]

Originally Posted by tvdinner

Your man Simpson has been sued and found liable for a wrongful death but that doesn't seem to bother you. Or am I wrong? Are there two OJ Simpsons that killed two human beings?

The lawsuit against Dr Phil relative to the Holloway case was dropped, yet Martin counts that.

[tv]

Originally Posted by socaldiva

The lawsuit against Dr Phil relative to the Holloway case was dropped, yet Martin counts that.

Everyone has to be discredited to make Simpson look good. It's going to take a lot more than trashing Dr. Phil to make OJ Simpson look like a model citizen.

[socaldiva]

Originally Posted by tvdinner

Everyone has to be discredited to make Simpson look good. It's going to take a lot more than trashing Dr. Phil to make OJ Simpson look like a model citizen.

I know. Dr Phil & Pablo F. are just two more conspirators out to get poor ole OJ.

Gotta run

[tv]

Originally Posted by socaldiva

I know. Dr Phil & Pablo F. are just two more conspirators out to get poor ole OJ.

Gotta run

Just about the only people that I haven't seen accused of trying to get him are Arnelle and his mother.

[martin II]

Originally Posted by tvdinner

Now you're attacking the ghostwriter?

tv
everyone involved in this case by making tv appearances and collecting money, deserves to have their actions evaluated.Pablo included.

imo
martin II

[tv]

Originally Posted by martin II

tv
everyone involved in this case by making tv appearances and collecting money, deserves to have their actions evaluated.Pablo included.

imo
martin II

Including the murderer himself, OJ Simpson.

[martin II]

Originally Posted by tvdinner

Including the murderer himself, OJ Simpson.

tv
there has been no shortage of attacks on oj which supports my position that
everyone involved in taking money and making tv appearances deserves to be evaluated.imo
including Pablo
martin II

[weezer]

Originally Posted by tvdinner

Just about the only people that I haven't seen accused of trying to get him are Arnelle and his mother.

arnelle can't turn on him -- who would buy her cheerios?

[socaldiva]

Originally Posted by fbgweezer

arnelle can't turn on him -- who would buy her cheerios?

I guess since Arnelle attempted to make money on the book, it's fair game to "evaluate" her

[martin II]

Originally Posted by tvdinner

Now you're attacking the ghostwriter?

tv

i think that the fact that Pablo said Regan paid him his fee of $100,000.00
as the apointed ghost writer but a ghost writer is listed in LBA court creditor documents as being owed $300,000 leads one to ask why.Was there two ghost writers. That is a logical question to be asked of him.
imo
martin II

[tv]

Originally Posted by martin II

tv

i think that the fact that Pablo said Regan paid him his fee of $100,000.00
as the apointed ghost writer but a ghost writer is listed in LBA court creditor documents as being owed $300,000 leads one to ask why.Was there two ghost writers. That is a logical question to be asked of him.
imo
martin II

Ask all you want. I don't see PF as having any ulterior motives so what he was paid or not paid really doesn't interest me.

[martin II]

Originally Posted by fbgweezer

arnelle can't turn on him -- who would buy her cheerios?

If that is true then one could say the same for fred and little kim. Or would you dissagree?

[weezer]

Originally Posted by martin II

If that is true then one could say the same for fred and little kim. Or would you dissagree?

I don't have a clue as to what you thought you were insinuating! LOL