truTV: Not Reality. Actuality.

Crime Library Message Boards  

Go Back   Crime Library Message Boards > NOTORIOUS MURDERS & CELEBRITY CASES > O.J. Simpson

O.J. Simpson The criminal and civil trials of OJ Simpson in the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-18-2007, 12:14 PM
Nickclone Nickclone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4
Nickclone is an unknown quantity at this point
Analysis of The Simpson Trial Is Garbage!

I have to say that after reading "Analysis of the OJ Simpson Murder Trial" by Thomas L. Jones, I think the site admins should remove his article. It has to be the most biased text I have ever seen posted on this usually informative and intriguing site.

Jones' blatant biased view of Simpson makes me double guess every "fact" thats in the article as actual fact, the writer's opinion or just some load of crap that supposed to sway us into his point of view. He repeatedly calls Simpson a liar and a murderer (even though he was acquitted), he calls the defense team underhanded, sleazy liars, defends Fuhrman, blames blacks for "letting him off" and thanking whites for administering justice in the civil suit. I come to this site to learn about criminal cases, not some blowhard's personal interests.
  #2  
Old 09-18-2007, 12:27 PM
Luke Davis's Avatar
Luke Davis Luke Davis is offline
Criime Library Supreme Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 14,151
Luke Davis has a reputation beyond reputeLuke Davis has a reputation beyond reputeLuke Davis has a reputation beyond reputeLuke Davis has a reputation beyond reputeLuke Davis has a reputation beyond reputeLuke Davis has a reputation beyond reputeLuke Davis has a reputation beyond reputeLuke Davis has a reputation beyond reputeLuke Davis has a reputation beyond reputeLuke Davis has a reputation beyond reputeLuke Davis has a reputation beyond repute
Maybe OJ should sue him?
__________________
♥♥Luke Davis will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions from any of the hereinabove. This may be regarded as opinion only.♥♥
  #3  
Old 09-18-2007, 01:01 PM
weezer weezer is offline
On Vacation
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,479
weezer has a reputation beyond reputeweezer has a reputation beyond reputeweezer has a reputation beyond reputeweezer has a reputation beyond reputeweezer has a reputation beyond reputeweezer has a reputation beyond reputeweezer has a reputation beyond reputeweezer has a reputation beyond reputeweezer has a reputation beyond reputeweezer has a reputation beyond reputeweezer has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickclone View Post
I have to say that after reading "Analysis of the OJ Simpson Murder Trial" by Thomas L. Jones, I think the site admins should remove his article. It has to be the most biased text I have ever seen posted on this usually informative and intriguing site.

Jones' blatant biased view of Simpson makes me double guess every "fact" thats in the article as actual fact, the writer's opinion or just some load of crap that supposed to sway us into his point of view. He repeatedly calls Simpson a liar and a murderer (even though he was acquitted), he calls the defense team underhanded, sleazy liars, defends Fuhrman, blames blacks for "letting him off" and thanking whites for administering justice in the civil suit. I come to this site to learn about criminal cases, not some blowhard's personal interests.
I haven't read it but it sounds like something I might enjoy. Thanks for the heads-up!
  #4  
Old 09-18-2007, 01:35 PM
socaldiva's Avatar
socaldiva socaldiva is offline
Criime Library Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: No link? JMO, MOO & IMO
Posts: 8,603
socaldiva has a reputation beyond reputesocaldiva has a reputation beyond reputesocaldiva has a reputation beyond reputesocaldiva has a reputation beyond reputesocaldiva has a reputation beyond reputesocaldiva has a reputation beyond reputesocaldiva has a reputation beyond reputesocaldiva has a reputation beyond reputesocaldiva has a reputation beyond reputesocaldiva has a reputation beyond reputesocaldiva has a reputation beyond repute
Not only have I not read it, but this is the first I've heard of it. Sounds like I could have written it myself as ITA
  #5  
Old 09-19-2007, 06:21 AM
Nickclone Nickclone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4
Nickclone is an unknown quantity at this point
Its an interesting read, but I wouldn't use it as a factual base.
  #6  
Old 09-19-2007, 09:16 AM
Bailey Boys Bailey Boys is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wrapping presents with Springflower!!
Posts: 1,064
Bailey Boys has a reputation beyond reputeBailey Boys has a reputation beyond reputeBailey Boys has a reputation beyond reputeBailey Boys has a reputation beyond reputeBailey Boys has a reputation beyond reputeBailey Boys has a reputation beyond reputeBailey Boys has a reputation beyond reputeBailey Boys has a reputation beyond reputeBailey Boys has a reputation beyond reputeBailey Boys has a reputation beyond reputeBailey Boys has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickclone View Post
I have to say that after reading "Analysis of the OJ Simpson Murder Trial" by Thomas L. Jones, I think the site admins should remove his article. It has to be the most biased text I have ever seen posted on this usually informative and intriguing site.

Jones' blatant biased view of Simpson makes me double guess every "fact" thats in the article as actual fact, the writer's opinion or just some load of crap that supposed to sway us into his point of view. He repeatedly calls Simpson a liar and a murderer (even though he was acquitted), he calls the defense team underhanded, sleazy liars, defends Fuhrman, blames blacks for "letting him off" and thanking whites for administering justice in the civil suit. I come to this site to learn about criminal cases, not some blowhard's personal interests.
Never heard about that one, but thanks! It sounds like something I would enjoy reading!
__________________
conspire to villify Howard....no need to do something that he, himself has already done.
  #7  
Old 09-19-2007, 09:16 AM
Bailey Boys Bailey Boys is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wrapping presents with Springflower!!
Posts: 1,064
Bailey Boys has a reputation beyond reputeBailey Boys has a reputation beyond reputeBailey Boys has a reputation beyond reputeBailey Boys has a reputation beyond reputeBailey Boys has a reputation beyond reputeBailey Boys has a reputation beyond reputeBailey Boys has a reputation beyond reputeBailey Boys has a reputation beyond reputeBailey Boys has a reputation beyond reputeBailey Boys has a reputation beyond reputeBailey Boys has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by fbgweezer View Post
I haven't read it but it sounds like something I might enjoy. Thanks for the heads-up!
Would it make a good Christmas gift?
__________________
conspire to villify Howard....no need to do something that he, himself has already done.
  #8  
Old 11-13-2007, 01:01 AM
Nickclone Nickclone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4
Nickclone is an unknown quantity at this point
I'm guessing most, if not all, of the people on this forum think he's guilty?
  #9  
Old 11-13-2007, 10:04 AM
Kate Sachel's Avatar
Kate Sachel Kate Sachel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,658
Kate Sachel is a splendid one to beholdKate Sachel is a splendid one to beholdKate Sachel is a splendid one to beholdKate Sachel is a splendid one to beholdKate Sachel is a splendid one to beholdKate Sachel is a splendid one to beholdKate Sachel is a splendid one to beholdKate Sachel is a splendid one to beholdKate Sachel is a splendid one to beholdKate Sachel is a splendid one to beholdKate Sachel is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickclone View Post
I'm guessing most, if not all, of the people on this forum think he's guilty?
I would say that yes, the majority of those on this forum believe him to be guilty. There are some that believe that he's not guilty, and still some that remain undecided.

Kate
  #10  
Old 11-13-2007, 08:14 PM
martin II's Avatar
martin II martin II is offline
Criime Library Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 17,779
martin II has a reputation beyond reputemartin II has a reputation beyond reputemartin II has a reputation beyond reputemartin II has a reputation beyond reputemartin II has a reputation beyond reputemartin II has a reputation beyond reputemartin II has a reputation beyond reputemartin II has a reputation beyond reputemartin II has a reputation beyond reputemartin II has a reputation beyond reputemartin II has a reputation beyond repute
The oj hearing

Alexander a prosecution witness testified today that he had asked oj's friend
the wedding groom to give him money for a lawyer the groom refused. His words to the groom on a recorder were 'IF give me money i can help your guy out.(meaning oj)

A defense lawyer asked him " what do you mean you can help oj out"

Alexander responded that "He would slant his testimony in favor oj ?

Asked to further explain what he meant he then testified " I would just NOT tell (DA) the exact truth"

martin II
  #11  
Old 11-13-2007, 11:28 PM
socaldiva's Avatar
socaldiva socaldiva is offline
Criime Library Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: No link? JMO, MOO & IMO
Posts: 8,603
socaldiva has a reputation beyond reputesocaldiva has a reputation beyond reputesocaldiva has a reputation beyond reputesocaldiva has a reputation beyond reputesocaldiva has a reputation beyond reputesocaldiva has a reputation beyond reputesocaldiva has a reputation beyond reputesocaldiva has a reputation beyond reputesocaldiva has a reputation beyond reputesocaldiva has a reputation beyond reputesocaldiva has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by martin II View Post
The oj hearing

Alexander a prosecution witness testified today that he had asked oj's friend
the wedding groom to give him money for a lawyer the groom refused. His words to the groom on a recorder were 'IF give me money i can help your guy out.(meaning oj)

A defense lawyer asked him " what do you mean you can help oj out"

Alexander responded that "He would slant his testimony in favor oj ?

Asked to further explain what he meant he then testified " I would just NOT tell (DA) the exact truth"

martin II
I think this thread is referring to the murder trial, not the Vegas caper.....
  #12  
Old 11-14-2007, 08:17 PM
rachelslaw's Avatar
rachelslaw rachelslaw is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 995
rachelslaw has a reputation beyond reputerachelslaw has a reputation beyond reputerachelslaw has a reputation beyond reputerachelslaw has a reputation beyond reputerachelslaw has a reputation beyond reputerachelslaw has a reputation beyond reputerachelslaw has a reputation beyond reputerachelslaw has a reputation beyond reputerachelslaw has a reputation beyond reputerachelslaw has a reputation beyond reputerachelslaw has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by socaldiva View Post
Not only have I not read it, but this is the first I've heard of it. Sounds like I could have written it myself as ITA
I've never heard of it either, but it sounds good to me too.

IMO
__________________
"We've learned quite a lot, but we don't want to jeopardize the investigation by prematurely releasing what we've found," said Brown in a news conference. "I'm not going to speculate on charges. But someone is dead."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,301436,00.html
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 AM.

Advertisement

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

© 2008 Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. A Time Warner Company. All rights reserved.

truTV.com is part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Digital Network. Terms & Privacy guidelines