| Crime Library Administrative Issues A place to dicuss how CL is organized and run. |
|

08-29-2007, 01:27 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 516
|
|
|
personal stories
so, when somebody uses their personal background [say being a domestic violence victim, being raised in aparticular religion, having a phd in psychology] to claim a particular expertise or understanding of an issue, is it unacceptable to express one's Disbelief in the poster's story ?... seems to me, if it's ok to congratulate, applaud, sympathize with, give special credence to posters of those personal backgrounds... it should be ok to express one's disbelief.
imo.
__________________
It is better to rough up 10 innocent men than to let one guilty man go free.
|
|

08-29-2007, 06:58 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MY OPINION
Posts: 265
|
|
|
I2213
Quote:
Originally Posted by thepoint
so, when somebody uses their personal background [say being a domestic violence victim, being raised in aparticular religion, having a phd in psychology] to claim a particular expertise or understanding of an issue, is it unacceptable to express one's Disbelief in the poster's story ?... seems to me, if it's ok to congratulate, applaud, sympathize with, give special credence to posters of those personal backgrounds... it should be ok to express one's disbelief.
imo.
|
I agree.
imo
__________________
IMO
|
|

08-29-2007, 07:47 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,041
|
|
|
As for my part, I think it makes a difference how you say it. Being rude or sarcastic doesn't seem right to me.
__________________
HopeMonger
All Posts My Opinion
Links Previously Provided
|
|

08-29-2007, 11:11 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,086
|
|
|
Since there is no way to verify whether or not a poster is being truthful about personal experiences, I tend to believe what people say. I don't assume people have "agendas" that would cause them to lie or make up stories. I do believe the longer and more frequently a person posts, you can see patterns develop and also determine if their stories seem authentic to you. If someone is making up a wild story, that person has some real problems and we should probably tread lightly. I also know that truth is often stranger than fiction.
__________________
Dynamic reasoning shifts!
All posts are my opinion
|
|

09-05-2007, 11:53 AM
|
 |
Criime Library Supreme Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 10,332
|
|
|
My tendency is to give people the benefit of the doubt until I see a pattern of posts that makes her/him appear to be completely biased or unbelieveable. For instance, if someone claims to be in the medical profession and then gives an explanation or a for instance that wouldn't be suitable for even Wikipedia, I lose faith. I also have a huge problem with people using their "expertise" to suffice for posting truth as fact rather than simply stating that something is in their personal experience or merely anecdotal.
And I'm on the record for calling people out for posting BS.
__________________
I went to brush something off my cheek and it was the floor. Raymond Chandler
It's easy to quit smoking. I've done it hundreds of times. Mark Twain
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject. Winston Churchill
And I would add that the truth and Ms. Anthony are strangers. The Honorable Stan Strickland
Heredity is what sets the parents of a teenager wondering about each other. Laurence J. Peter
|
|

09-09-2007, 11:49 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas Suburbs
Posts: 1,136
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lorettalockhorn
My tendency is to give people the benefit of the doubt until I see a pattern of posts that makes her/him appear to be completely biased or unbelieveable. For instance, if someone claims to be in the medical profession and then gives an explanation or a for instance that wouldn't be suitable for even Wikipedia, I lose faith. I also have a huge problem with people using their "expertise" to suffice for posting truth as fact rather than simply stating that something is in their personal experience or merely anecdotal.
And I'm on the record for calling people out for posting BS.
|
I agree. I usually take what posters say at face value unless they contradict themselves. For example, if someone claims that he knew and liked the victim and some of her family, then months later says he didn't know any of them, I stop believing anything he says about his relationship to the case and his motivations.
__________________
Guess who's back?
|
|

09-11-2007, 12:46 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 12
|
|
|
On trusting credibility.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lorettalockhorn
My tendency is to give people the benefit of the doubt until I see a pattern of posts that makes her/him appear to be completely biased or unbelieveable. For instance, if someone claims to be in the medical profession and then gives an explanation or a for instance that wouldn't be suitable for even Wikipedia, I lose faith. I also have a huge problem with people using their "expertise" to suffice for posting truth as fact rather than simply stating that something is in their personal experience or merely anecdotal.
And I'm on the record for calling people out for posting BS.
|
I usually work from the ground up when it comes to trust. I know I am a brand new poster but hopefully people take me seriously, haha. I think it's better to start by not trusting someone and then trusting them when they build that. That way you are never disappointed if someone disappoints you.
That's not to say that I am rude to other people until they prove me otherwise but I am distant.
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:35 AM.
|
|
Advertisement
|