O.J. Simpson to discuss killings

[GrrlPwer]

The two-part interview, titled "O.J. Simpson: If I Did It, Here's How It Happened," will air Nov. 27 and Nov. 29, the TV network said.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061115/...pson_interview

[2L8 4A D8]

Who cares? Unless OJ is going to flat-out confess, I am not interested in anything he has to say or do!

JMO and MOO!!

[gemsbmw]

Originally posted by GrrlPwer
The two-part interview, titled "O.J. Simpson: If I Did It, Here's How It Happened," will air Nov. 27 and Nov. 29, the TV network said.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061115/...pson_interview

It should be called How I Did It.

[tazzybaby]

The only thing I didn't expect was the interview.

I wonder what Galanter will say now.

I guess we will see him on every talk show...


But Galanter vows, "If anyone comes out with such a book, I'll go on every talk show and call it crap."

[martin II]

Originally posted by tazzybaby
The only thing I didn't expect was the interview.

I wonder what Galanter will say now.

I guess we will see him on every talk show...


But Galanter vows, "If anyone comes out with such a book, I'll go on every talk show and call it crap."

tazzy hi
He did say that.
MARTIN ii

I am disgusted by this publicity stunt and cannot understand where he is coming from. Is he going to really tell us how we "would have" committed the crime? Even if he did not do it (and he did), how sick is that to put yourself into the mind of a killer and tell us what you would have done? I wish he would go away, because he has lost all sense of credibility in our society.

Originally posted by cryostate
I am disgusted by this publicity stunt and cannot understand where he is coming from. Is he going to really tell us how we "would have" committed the crime? Even if he did not do it (and he did), how sick is that to put yourself into the mind of a killer and tell us what you would have done? I wish he would go away, because he has lost all sense of credibility in our society.

I agree, this is typical of his sick mind. Makes me think that he has spent a great deal of time over the past months/years thinking (or reliving) this gruesome deed. What kind of mind would willingly want to relive all that horror?

My question is what type of financial gain is there in this, and how long will it take for the Goldman/Brown contingent to take this to court to stop him from reaping benefits? I hope they are in discussions NOW to keep him from gaining a cent off of this fiasco.

JMO

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by martin II

tazzy hi
He did say that.
MARTIN ii

Hi Martin,

I know. So, I wonder why he lied?

[martin II]

Originally posted by tazzybaby


Hi Martin,

I know. So, I wonder why he lied?

tazzy hi
seems like it but in that busness ,entertainmant, telling a lie is quite normal. sometimes people have good reasons for telling lies.

I don't believe any of it until it happens. Especially since FOX is involved and Judith Ragan. She played the other woman in a affair with the now ex n.y. city police commissioner (a felon i thinK) Bernie Klerick (sp)
martin II

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by martin II


tazzy hi
seems like it but in that busness ,entertainmant, telling a lie is quite normal. sometimes people have good reasons for telling lies.

I don't believe any of it until it happens. Especially since FOX is involved and Judith Ragan. She played the other woman in a affair with the now ex n.y. city police commissioner (a felon i thinK) Bernie Klerick (sp)
martin II

Martin,

In that business? Yale Galanter is in that business? I thought he was a defense attorney? I will never believe another word he says.

Well, you didn't believe it was true before. Turns out, the National Enquirer isn't as deceptive as Yale Galanter and his murderous client.

OJ is the lowest of the low.

[limakey]

Taz,

Yale would not be the first lawyer or advisor not to know of their client's plan until it was too late. Perfect example, Princess Diana's advisor, Patrick Jepson (sp?)--he quit after she did that TV interview.

I can't imagine he would go on TV and say that if he knew what was happening. Remember, Gloria Allred ditched the Brown family after they sold private mementos of Nicole's life. It happens.

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by limakey
Taz,

Yale would not be the first lawyer or advisor not to know of their client's plan until it was too late. Perfect example, Princess Diana's advisor, Patrick Jepson (sp?)--he quit after she did that TV interview.

I can't imagine he would go on TV and say that if he knew what was happening. Remember, Gloria Allred ditched the Brown family after they sold private mementos of Nicole's life. It happens.

This is not the first time this has happened with these two. And, he said he would go on all the talk shows and call it a lie (or to repeat his words call it crap). He knows better than to say something like that.

So, I still can't ever believe Yale Galanter again. Since "oj doesn't tell him the truth".

[Kate Sachel]

Perhaps Fred Goldman should do a follow-up interview and title it "If I Ever Killed OJ, Here's How I'd Do It".

Kate

Originally posted by Kate Sachel
Perhaps Fred Goldman should do a follow-up interview and title it "If I Ever Killed OJ, Here's How I'd Do It".

Kate

I'll buy the book it if he ever wrote it!

[martin II]

Originally posted by tazzybaby


Martin,

In that business? Yale Galanter is in that business? I thought he was a defense attorney? I will never believe another word he says.

Well, you didn't believe it was true before. Turns out, the National Enquirer isn't as deceptive as Yale Galanter and his murderous client.

OJ is the lowest of the low.

tazzy hi

I really didn't believe it mainly because saying IF I DID IT for many will be a confession of in fact i did it.

But then no one offered me $3.5 million to put my name on such a tease.
martin II

[martin II]

Originally posted by tazzybaby


This is not the first time this has happened with these two. And, he said he would go on all the talk shows and call it a lie (or to repeat his words call it crap). He knows better than to say something like that.

So, I still can't ever believe Yale Galanter again. Since "oj doesn't tell him the truth".

TAZZY
It may be that Galanter did not know.
i wonder who the producer is .
martin II

Originally posted by GrrlPwer
The two-part interview, titled "O.J. Simpson: If I Did It, Here's How It Happened," will air Nov. 27 and Nov. 29, the TV network said.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061115/...pson_interview

I wonder if OJ understands that there is no limitation on being charged with murder...if there is more evidence...wonder if......this somehow could implicate him? OJ have you checked with your attorney b/4 releasing this?

While I really haven't seen this b/4, this brings me back to what Nancy Grace has been saying, saying and saying....'they just can't keep quiet when talking about the crime they committed.' While I was quite convinced OJ was fairly acquitted..now, I have to take a closer look at his guilt.

[bandit's mom]

[quote]Originally posted by Kate Sachel
Perhaps Fred Goldman should do a follow-up interview and title it "If I Ever Killed OJ, Here's How I'd Do It".

Kate [/QUOTE

And what jury would ever convict him?

[bandit's mom]

[quote]Originally posted by Mashey46
[b]

I wonder if OJ understands that there is no limitation on being charged with murder...if there is more evidence...wonder if......this somehow could implicate him? OJ have you checked with your attorney b/4 releasing this?

OJ was charged and acquitted. He can drop the How I would
have done it crap and just call it like it is, How I did do it,
and there's not one thing that can be done to him. Double
Jeapordy applies. It's possible he could be charged with perjury
for depo's given during the civil trial, but that's it. He can tell
the world he murdered two people in cold blood and he will
remain a free man.

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by Kate Sachel
Perhaps Fred Goldman should do a follow-up interview and title it "If I Ever Killed OJ, Here's How I'd Do It".

Kate

[sassylassy]

Originally posted by martin II


tazzy hi

I really didn't believe it mainly because saying IF I DID IT for many will be a confession of in fact i did it.

But then no one offered me $3.5 million to put my name on such a tease.
martin II

They say money makes people do crazy things.

If O.J Simpson was paid $3.5 million then I understand why he wrote the book- that is some Pay Day

[tazzybaby]

Originally posted by sassylassy


They say money makes people do crazy things.

If O.J Simpson was paid $3.5 million then I understand why he wrote the book- that is some Pay Day

And, you think it's a good thing for him to make money off of his childrens' mothers murder? That's blood money.

[sassylassy]

Originally posted by tazzybaby


And, you think it's a good thing for him to make money off of his childrens' mothers murder? That's blood money.

I never said it was good. I said I under-stand why.

Money.

[martin II]

Originally posted by tazzybaby


And, you think it's a good thing for him to make money off of his childrens' mothers murder? That's blood money.

tazzy hi

That may be how you look at it. The interviewer, publisher, FOX,
ratail book store and the promoter are also involved in this effort.
Everyone is trying to make big bucks in this deal.

If it turns out to be true that he is getting $3.5 mill i am sure that money will go to a off shore account and out of reach of any creditors.imo
martin II

[Kate Sachel]

From CCN:

Judith Regan, whose ReganBooks imprint is publishing the book, declined to reveal further details of the book's contents.

"This is an historic case, and I consider this his confession," Regan told The Associated Press. She also refused to say what Simpson is being paid for the book but said he came to her with the idea.




http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/TV/1....ap/index.html


Kate

[Kate Sachel]

Originally posted by Kate Sachel
From CCN:

Judith Regan, whose ReganBooks imprint is publishing the book, declined to reveal further details of the book's contents.

"This is an historic case, and I consider this his confession," Regan told The Associated Press. She also refused to say what Simpson is being paid for the book but said he came to her with the idea.




http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/TV/1....ap/index.html


Kate

So it was his own sick idea ... I should have known.

Even his publisher considers this to be his confession.

Kate

[sassylassy]

I don't think this is a confession from O.J Simpson. I think this is all media hype!

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by martin II
[b]*snip*

The interviewer, publisher, FOX,
ratail book store and the promoter are also involved in this effort.
Everyone is trying to make big bucks in this deal.

"Everyone" isn't the parent of Sydney & Justin & it appears it was his idea. What's your excuse now?

[sassylassy]

Originally posted by socaldiva


"Everyone" isn't the parent of Sydney & Justin & it appears it was his idea. What's your excuse now?

This isn't the first book O.J Simpson wrote.

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by sassylassy


This isn't the first book O.J Simpson wrote.

Yes, I'm aware of that. What's your point?

[martin II]

Originally posted by sassylassy
I don't think this is a confession from O.J Simpson. I think this is all media hype!

sassy
i cannot believe that J Regan is being critical of someones behavior.IMO
Martin II

[martin II]

Originally posted by sassylassy
I don't think this is a confession from O.J Simpson. I think this is all media hype!

correct

It is a business deal between several groups .if one wants to make the natives restless, ( and sell books) this is the subject.imo

martin II

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by martin II
*snip*
i cannot believe that J Regan is being critical of someones behavior.IMO
Martin II

Why because you think she had an affair? What a joke. Simpson had multiple affairs, beat his wife, stole cable and murdered two people . Get real.

Originally posted by socaldiva
"Everyone" isn't the parent of Sydney & Justin & it appears it was his idea. What's your excuse now?

According to O J Simpson's attorney (just on Catherine Crier) his kids are behind the project 100%.


O J Simpson isn't confessing, he's merely speculating on how he would have approached the difficult task of commiting the perfect murder.



Daghda

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by daghda
*snip*

According to O J Simpson's attorney (just on Catherine Crier) his kids are behind the project 100%.

We've already seen Gallanter lie & what would you expect him to say in this instance?. They had to have known that question was coming.

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by daghda
*snip*
O J Simpson isn't confessing, he's merely speculating on how he would have approached the difficult task of commiting the perfect murder.
Daghda

He didn't "commit" the perfect murder. Far from it. He left evidence everywhere. He just got lucky with some boneheaded jurors. imo

Originally posted by socaldiva
We've already seen Gallanter lie & what would you expect him to say in this instance?. They had to have known that question was coming.

All I can say is I'm really looking forward to the interview, and I will purchase the book - with the knowledge of course that the Browns and Goldman's won't see a red cent




Daghda

[socaldiva]

Originally posted by daghda


All I can say is I'm really looking forward to the interview, and I will purchase the book - with the knowledge of course that the Browns and Goldman's won't see a red cent
Daghda

Good for you. I do find it odd that you use the patriotic icon in support of denying the Goldman's what was awarded to them in a court of law.

[sassylassy]

Originally posted by socaldiva


Yes, I'm aware of that. What's your point?

No point, just a fact.

He didn't "commit" the perfect murder. Far from it. He left evidence everywhere. He just got lucky with some boneheaded jurors. imo

That's probably the reason for the new book. He's had plenty of time to rethink how he could done it even better.