| Links and Archives Case Information related to the disappearance of Natalee Holloway |
|
08-14-2006, 12:15 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: My posts are my opinion
Posts: 1,685
|
|
|
From the other thread that is now locked, I am looking for someone to PM me the link to the image of Deepak's signed June 13th statement that is supposed to be posted at BFN. All I have found is a translation.
Thanks.
|
|
08-14-2006, 12:16 AM
|
|
Criime Library Supreme Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Living in a little place called REALITY
Posts: 7,870
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by nascarmom
From the other thread that is now locked, I am looking for someone to PM me the link to the image of Deepak's signed June 13th statement that is supposed to be posted at BFN. All I have found is a translation.
Thanks.
|
There is no image of it on BFN. Just what someone typed on there.
|
|
08-14-2006, 12:20 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: My posts are my opinion
Posts: 1,685
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Watership Down
There is no image of it on BFN. Just what someone typed on there.
|
Well this post was made
MiamiNice1
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: The truth is not "bait." ~ Roni
Posts: 1364
FEELINGS: The SIGNED Deepak Statement is on JUNE 13th!
And I was told that I was WRONG by Miami about stating the June 11 statement is signed. I see an image for the 11th statement but I can't find one for the 13th so I'm curious where Miami saw signatures.
|
|
08-14-2006, 12:22 AM
|
|
Criime Library Supreme Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Living in a little place called REALITY
Posts: 7,870
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by nascarmom
Well this post was made
MiamiNice1
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: The truth is not "bait." ~ Roni
Posts: 1364
FEELINGS: The SIGNED Deepak Statement is on JUNE 13th!
And I was told that I was WRONG by Miami about stating the June 11 statement is signed. I see an image for the 11th statement but I can't find one for the 13th so I'm curious where Miami saw signatures.
|
It might be on the monkey site but I'd recommend using an anonymizer if you go there. That is where BFN got it from. That is also where they got the "rough translation" of the phone records that have statements made in their translation that isn't in the original.
|
|
08-14-2006, 12:25 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: My posts are my opinion
Posts: 1,685
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Watership Down
It might be on the monkey site but I'd recommend using an anonymizer if you go there. That is where BFN got it from. That is also where they got the "rough translation" of the phone records that have statements made in their translation that isn't in the original.
|
No, Miami said it's at BFN:
MiamiNice1
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: The truth is not "bait." ~ Roni
Posts: 1364
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by nascarmom
Where is the image of Deepak's June13 statement that has a signature?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is on BFN. I have it sitting in "minimized mode" as we speak.
(Now, please, I'm branching out with TREE )
============================================
|
|
08-14-2006, 12:27 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Under the Moon over Miami
Posts: 957
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by nascarmom
No, Miami said it's at BFN:
MiamiNice1
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: The truth is not "bait." ~ Roni
Posts: 1364
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by nascarmom
Where is the image of Deepak's June13 statement that has a signature?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is on BFN. I have it sitting in "minimized mode" as we speak.
(Now, please, I'm branching out with TREE )
============================================
|
STILL can't find it? It's there. Also, look on the bottom of the statement - it's dated June 13th. Looks like RU and SM are WRONG.
===============
"To your question whether this statement I have now given is truthful, I can say the following. This statement is based 100% on the truth. After I have reviewed the statement with my lawyer, I will sign it.
D.S. KALPOE
After the suspect D.S. KALPOE had read the statement, he declared to stick with what he declared/persist in what he had declared and signed the statement. .
Of this ,we reporting officers, on our oath of office have made this proces-verbaal, closed and signed in Oranjestad on June 13th 2005."
|
|
08-14-2006, 12:28 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Under the Moon over Miami
Posts: 957
|
|
|
LOL - Look on PAGE 2. LOL!
|
|
08-14-2006, 12:29 AM
|
|
Criime Library Supreme Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Living in a little place called REALITY
Posts: 7,870
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by nascarmom
No, Miami said it's at BFN:
MiamiNice1
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: The truth is not "bait." ~ Roni
Posts: 1364
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by nascarmom
Where is the image of Deepak's June13 statement that has a signature?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is on BFN. I have it sitting in "minimized mode" as we speak.
(Now, please, I'm branching out with TREE )
============================================
|
Well it certainly isn't in the thread titled Deepak's June 13 statement. I looked at the entire thread and all that is there is where someone typed it. The only images on that thread are some ticklesite pictures.
|
|
08-14-2006, 12:32 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Under the Moon over Miami
Posts: 957
|
|
|
Now I see that nascarmom wants to see the actual Dutch typed document. No, it isn't on there. Just the typed English version.
|
|
08-14-2006, 12:32 AM
|
|
Criime Library Supreme Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Living in a little place called REALITY
Posts: 7,870
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MiamiNice1
STILL can't find it? It's there. Also, look on the bottom of the statement - it's dated June 13th. Looks like RU and SM are WRONG.
===============
"To your question whether this statement I have now given is truthful, I can say the following. This statement is based 100% on the truth. After I have reviewed the statement with my lawyer, I will sign it.
D.S. KALPOE
After the suspect D.S. KALPOE had read the statement, he declared to stick with what he declared/persist in what he had declared and signed the statement. .
Of this ,we reporting officers, on our oath of office have made this proces-verbaal, closed and signed in Oranjestad on June 13th 2005."
|
There is no image of that statement. Just what someone has typed and said is his statement.
|
|
08-14-2006, 12:35 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Under the Moon over Miami
Posts: 957
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Watership Down
There is no image of that statement. Just what someone has typed and said is his statement.
|
Yes, this is correct. I just realized now that NM wants to see the Dutch Typed version. It's not on there.
|
|
08-14-2006, 12:35 AM
|
 |
Super Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Stating My Opinion and Looking for justice for Natalee Holloway and Bud Larson
Posts: 2,520
|
|
News Flash !! Choose a Name in Aruba BURNED !!!
http://www.coolaruba.com/
|
|
08-14-2006, 12:37 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: My posts are my opinion
Posts: 1,685
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MiamiNice1
Now I see that nascarmom wants to see the actual Dutch typed document. No, it isn't on there. Just the typed English version.
|
I've been saying June 11 for quite awhile.
So how do you know the June13 statement is signed then?
|
|
08-14-2006, 12:40 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Under the Moon over Miami
Posts: 957
|
|
OK, NN, you've been holding out on us.....I could't read papiamentu (sp?)! LOL!
|
|
08-14-2006, 12:41 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Under the Moon over Miami
Posts: 957
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by nascarmom
I've been saying June 11 for quite awhile.
So how do you know the June13 statement is signed then?
|
I was going by this at the bottom of the statement where it says it's dated June 13th, 2005:
==========================
To your question whether this statement I have now given is truthful, I can say the following. This statement is based 100% on the truth. After I have reviewed the statement with my lawyer, I will sign it.
D.S. KALPOE
After the suspect D.S. KALPOE had read the statement, he declared to stick with what he declared/persist in what he had declared and signed the statement. .
Of this ,we reporting officers, on our oath of office have made this proces-verbaal, closed and signed in Oranjestad on June 13th 2005.
|
|
08-14-2006, 12:46 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: My posts are my opinion
Posts: 1,685
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MiamiNice1
I was going by this at the bottom of the statement where it says it's dated June 13th, 2005:
==========================
To your question whether this statement I have now given is truthful, I can say the following. This statement is based 100% on the truth. After I have reviewed the statement with my lawyer, I will sign it.
D.S. KALPOE
After the suspect D.S. KALPOE had read the statement, he declared to stick with what he declared/persist in what he had declared and signed the statement. .
Of this ,we reporting officers, on our oath of office have made this proces-verbaal, closed and signed in Oranjestad on June 13th 2005.
|
What does that have to do with your claim that it's the June 13th statement that is signed when there isn't even an image of it posted? What you posted does NOT show a signature or prove it is is signed.
Basically you've spent pages telling me I'm wrong when all along you have been wrong.
Last edited by nascarmom; 08-14-2006 at 12:51 AM.
|
|
08-14-2006, 12:47 AM
|
 |
Criime Library Supreme Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 14,151
|
|
__________________
♥♥Luke Davis will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions from any of the hereinabove. This may be regarded as opinion only.♥♥ 
|
|
08-14-2006, 12:49 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: My posts are my opinion
Posts: 1,685
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Luke Davis
Burned?
|
From construction on the roof, no one was hurt.
|
|
08-14-2006, 12:50 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Under the Moon over Miami
Posts: 957
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by nascarmom
What does that have to do with your claim that it's the June 13th statement that is signed when there isn't even an image of it posted? What you posted does NOT indicate the statement is signed.
Basically you've spent pages telling me I'm wrong when all along you have been wrong.
|
PAGES? That's you and WD. Don't you get tired of arguing? Stop already. I'm not wrong. The translated document dates it as June 13th. What is your proof it is otherwise?
Let it goooooooooo!
|
|
08-14-2006, 12:58 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Berlin
Posts: 87
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MiamiNice1
PAGES? That's you and WD. Don't you get tired of arguing? Stop already. I'm not wrong. The translated document dates it as June 13th. What is your proof it is otherwise?
Let it goooooooooo!
|
IMO if the statement is authentic, it is taken into account whether it is signed by the suspect or not.
|
|
08-14-2006, 01:01 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Under the Moon over Miami
Posts: 957
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by feelings
IMO if the statement is authentic, it is taken into account whether it is signed by the suspect or not.
|
It was nice seeing you, feelings. Going to call it a night as I have an early day tomorrow.
|
|
08-14-2006, 01:02 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: My posts are my opinion
Posts: 1,685
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MiamiNice1
Don't you get tired of arguing? Stop already. I'm not wrong. The translated document dates it as June 13th. What is your proof it is otherwise?
Let it goooooooooo!
|
Becuase you made it a point to say it was the Junde13th statement, the statement you used to back your claim, was the signed one.
I used a quote from the June11 statement that is indeed signed and there is a copy of the image posted showing the signature.
But you said I was wrong and that it was the June13 statement that was signed.
Originally posted by MiamiNice1
I get such a kick out of this statement from Deepak's SIGNED June 13th statement:
Originally posted by MiamiNice1
Thanks for your translation services....but they're not necessary. We can all clearly see she was wrong (as are you).
Originally posted by MiamiNice1
Debbie has it exactly right....YOU are WRONG. LOL!
Originally posted by MiamiNice1
Nascarmom is on roll being WRONG. Deepak's SIGNED statement is on June 13th......NOT the 11th.
Originally posted by MiamiNice1
FEELINGS: The SIGNED Deepak Statement is on JUNE 13th!
MiamiNice1
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by nascarmom
Where is the image of Deepak's June13 statement that has a signature?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is on BFN. I have it sitting in "minimized mode" as we speak.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps before you extend so much energy declaring how wrong someone is, you should make sure about it. Because clearly, I am not wrong on this one. The June11 statement is SIGNED and has the image showing it, whereas there is no image of the June13 statement posted at BFN, like you claimed, showing any signature.
|
|
08-14-2006, 01:04 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Under the Moon over Miami
Posts: 957
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by nascarmom
<snipped>
|
LOLOL! Clearly it is YOU expending all the energy! Where is PROOF it was signed on June 11th? Is it this hard for you to admit you were wrong? ROFL!
I clearly told you I misunderstood you wanting the Dutch signed statement. What more do you want?
Let it goooooooo! Not relevant. Not important. Try to get some rest.
imo.
|
|
08-14-2006, 01:07 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: My posts are my opinion
Posts: 1,685
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MiamiNice1
LOLOL! Clearly it is YOU expending all the energy! Where is PROOF it was sined on June 11th?
Let it goooooooo! Not relevant. Try to get some rest.
imo.
|
What are you talking about? The statement date is assigned to the date the statement was MADE not when it was SIGNED. And no where on the June 11 statement is there a date of June 13.
Not relevant? You claimed the June13 statement was SIGNED and said I was WRONG about which one is signed when clearly you are the one that is WRONG
|
|
08-14-2006, 01:08 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Under the Moon over Miami
Posts: 957
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by nascarmom
What are you talking about? The statement date is assigned to the date the statement was MADE not when it was SIGNED. And no where on the June 11 statement is the date of June 13.
You have been proven WRONG once again.
|
Sorry, but you are wrong. Let it goooooooo! 
|
|
08-14-2006, 01:11 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: My posts are my opinion
Posts: 1,685
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MiamiNice1
Sorry, but you are wrong. Let it goooooooo!
|
LMAO How am I wrong? I said the June 11 statement is signed and it is.
You said the June 13 statement at BFN is signed and there isn't even an image copy of it posted.
My claim is correct and you say I'm wrong when you are the one that is wrong. LMAO
LOL LOL LOL LOL
Originally posted by MiamiNice1
Nascarmom is on roll being WRONG. Deepak's SIGNED statement is on June 13th......NOT the 11th.
|
|
08-14-2006, 01:15 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Under the Moon over Miami
Posts: 957
|
|
Get some rest. You are clearly wrong. Let it goooooo!
P.S. - I posted proof it is dated June 13th. Where is your proof it is dated June 11th?
=============
To your question whether this statement I have now given is truthful, I can say the following. This statement is based 100% on the truth. After I have reviewed the statement with my lawyer, I will sign it.
D.S. KALPOE
After the suspect D.S. KALPOE had read the statement, he declared to stick with what he declared/persist in what he had declared and signed the statement. .
Of this ,we reporting officers, on our oath of office have made this proces-verbaal, closed and signed in Oranjestad on June 13th 2005."
Last edited by MiamiNice1; 08-14-2006 at 01:20 AM.
|
|
08-14-2006, 01:22 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: My posts are my opinion
Posts: 1,685
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MiamiNice1
Get some rest. You are clearly wrong. Let it goooooo!
P.S. - I posted proof it is dated June 13th. Where is your proof it is dated June 11th?
|
You were supposed to post proof to your claim that the June13 statement is SIGNED. You have yet to do that. Where is the image of the doc showing the signatures?
Well, let's see, I posted the name of the thread at BFN but since Debbie's integrity is such an issue, I can see where you would want additional proof. So here are the dates from the translation:
On June 11th 2005 at about 12:10 hours, we, the reporting officers, interviewed the suspect D.S. KALPOE, for further information.
Of which, we, the reporting officers on our oat as officers have made his proces-verbaal, closed and signed in Oranjestad on June 11 2005.
-------------
Originally posted by MiamiNice1
I get such a kick out of this statement from Deepak's SIGNED June 13th statement:
Originally posted by MiamiNice1
Nascarmom is on roll being WRONG. Deepak's SIGNED statement is on June 13th......NOT the 11th.
Originally posted by MiamiNice1
FEELINGS: The SIGNED Deepak Statement is on JUNE 13th!
-----------------
You are clearly wrong, why can't you admit it?
Last edited by nascarmom; 08-14-2006 at 01:25 AM.
|
|
08-14-2006, 01:24 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Under the Moon over Miami
Posts: 957
|
|
Sorry, but I am right. Look at the date at the bottom.
Now, post YOUR proof it was signed on June 11th.
Don't have it? Didn't think so. Let it goooooo!
==================
"To your question whether this statement I have now given is truthful, I can say the following. This statement is based 100% on the truth. After I have reviewed the statement with my lawyer, I will sign it.
D.S. KALPOE
After the suspect D.S. KALPOE had read the statement, he declared to stick with what he declared/persist in what he had declared and signed the statement. .
Of this ,we reporting officers, on our oath of office have made this proces-verbaal, closed and signed in Oranjestad on June 13th 2005."
|
|
08-14-2006, 01:27 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: With the one I love....myself
Posts: 789
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by nascarmom
You were supposed to post proof to your claim that the June13 statement is SIGNED. You have yet to do that. Where is the image of the doc showing the signatures?
Well, let's see, I posted the name of the thread at BFN but since Debbie's integrity is such an issue, I can see where you would want additional proof. So here are the dates from the translation:
On June 11th 2005 at about 12:10 hours, we, the reporting officers, interviewed the suspect D.S. KALPOE, for further information.
Of which, we, the reporting officers on our oat as officers have made his proces-verbaal, closed and signed in Oranjestad on June 11 2005.
-------------
You are clearly wrong, why can't you admit it?
|
Because that's the kind of people you are dealing with.....they don't admit the Skeeter tape was manipulated....they don't admit to anything....
Does she have an image to show there was a signature?
Do you have an image with a signature?
Not that I consider anything posted on the blogs as being reliable.....but at least having an actual picture of a signature is a start.....as opposed to nothing and claiming there is one.
|
|
08-14-2006, 01:27 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Under the Moon over Miami
Posts: 957
|
|
I will be the bigger person and stop. Now you go ahead and get your last word in.....
Nite nite.
|
|
08-14-2006, 01:27 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: My posts are my opinion
Posts: 1,685
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MiamiNice1
Sorry, but I am right. Look at the date at the bottom.
Now, post YOUR proof it was signed on June 11th.
Don't have it? Didn't think so. Let it goooooo!
==================
"To your question whether this statement I have now given is truthful, I can say the following. This statement is based 100% on the truth. After I have reviewed the statement with my lawyer, I will sign it.
D.S. KALPOE
After the suspect D.S. KALPOE had read the statement, he declared to stick with what he declared/persist in what he had declared and signed the statement. .
Of this ,we reporting officers, on our oath of office have made this proces-verbaal, closed and signed in Oranjestad on June 13th 2005."
|
LMAO everytime you have told me I am wrong, it turns out that YOU are the one that is WRONG.
Just like in this case.
Where is the signature on the June13th statement you claim exists?
The June 11 statement is signed, like I said, but to which you think I'm wrong about.
LMAO
|
|
08-14-2006, 01:28 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: My posts are my opinion
Posts: 1,685
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MiamiNice1
I will be the bigger person and stop. Nite nite.
|
If you were the bigger person, you would admit you were wrong and apologize.
|
|
08-14-2006, 01:32 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: With the one I love....myself
Posts: 789
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by nascarmom
If you were the bigger person, you would admit you were wrong and apologize.
|
It's funny but I have posted on here for quite some time.......and I have apologized for being mistaken in the past.....
I don't believe anyone has ever apologized to me on here.........they usually just quit responding.....or say they have to leave.....or attack me....saying I'm bashing them.
But I understand what kind of people I'm dealing with.....so it's not that big a deal.
|
|
08-14-2006, 01:35 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: My posts are my opinion
Posts: 1,685
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Narcissist15
Because that's the kind of people you are dealing with.....they don't admit the Skeeter tape was manipulated....they don't admit to anything....
Does she have an image to show there was a signature?
Do you have an image with a signature?
Not that I consider anything posted on the blogs as being reliable.....but at least having an actual picture of a signature is a start.....as opposed to nothing and claiming there is one.
|
LMAO, if her continued insistence that she is right when it is clear she is wrong, isn't bait, I don't know what it is.
I just don't understand that game. Be right at all costs - but then again, that's the way Beth is.
|
|
08-14-2006, 01:41 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: My posts are my opinion
Posts: 1,685
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Narcissist15
It's funny but I have posted on here for quite some time.......and I have apologized for being mistaken in the past.....
I don't believe anyone has ever apologized to me on here.........they usually just quit responding.....or say they have to leave.....or attack me....saying I'm bashing them.
But I understand what kind of people I'm dealing with.....so it's not that big a deal.
|
It's amazing the lengths some will go to just to keep from admitting they are wrong. I just don't get it
|
|
08-14-2006, 01:45 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: With the one I love....myself
Posts: 789
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by nascarmom
LMAO, if her continued insistence that she is right when it is clear she is wrong, isn't bait, I don't know what it is.
I just don't understand that game. Be right at all costs - but then again, that's the way Beth is.
|
I don't understand it......I mean that seems to be the case......Joran is the person at all costs......never wrong......I mean look at the Skeeter tape......you can claim you believe every other portion of the tape.....I think the only classy thing to do is come out and talk about the possibility that the tape was manipulated, apologize about what was played on Dr. Phil was possibly manipulated........instead we hear how it's just irrelevant after weeks and weeks of how it is going to break the case.
|
|
08-14-2006, 01:52 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: My posts are my opinion
Posts: 1,685
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Narcissist15
I don't understand it......I mean that seems to be the case......Joran is the person at all costs......never wrong......I mean look at the Skeeter tape......you can claim you believe every other portion of the tape.....I think the only classy thing to do is come out and talk about the possibility that the tape was manipulated, apologize about what was played on Dr. Phil was possibly manipulated........instead we hear how it's just irrelevant after weeks and weeks of how it is going to break the case.
|
Oh I agree. I remember the lead ins from Beth herself, how it was explosive evidence that was going to blow the case wide open.
And instead of turning this bombshell over to the authorities, even to the FBI, it gets played on the Dr Phil show. And then she used that tape to say it was gang rape.
And then *poof*, the tape is discredited but not the claims of gang rape!
|
|
08-14-2006, 01:53 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: With the one I love....myself
Posts: 789
|
|
|
Oh....then think about how much of these "facts" we hear have came from Jossy.........
I'm sure that those that believed him for so long before he was proven to be a liar even to them haven't separated those "facts" from what they discuss now.....
|
|
08-14-2006, 02:04 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: My posts are my opinion
Posts: 1,685
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Narcissist15
Oh....then think about how much of these "facts" we hear have came from Jossy.........
I'm sure that those that believed him for so long before he was proven to be a liar even to them haven't separated those "facts" from what they discuss now.....
|
I think the drama on Nancy Grace being 'proof' comes in a very close second. Unperson listed the damage Jossy caused to this case with his 'witnesses'. Each and every one fully investigated and checked out with landfills searched and ponds drained, but ALE didn't investigate 
Is Jossy still IMO hiding out in Florida?
Nice seeing you again today! I have to head to bed and hope the storm rolling thru doesn't knock power out.
See you later !
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
 Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:45 PM.
|
|
Advertisement
|
