| Member Discussion of Tara Grinstead Case Missing 10/22/2005 |
|

03-18-2006, 09:53 PM
|
 |
Super Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: www.findtara.com
Posts: 2,673
|
|
|
Big News
WWW.FINDTARA.COM
Dr. Godwin says:
"Tara was attacked and abducted between 11:05 PM Sat. night and 5:00 AM Sunday morning. The perpetrator returned to Tara's home sometime Monday morning after 12:15 am and dropped the latex glove. This suggests that the perpetrator was very comfortable with being in the area and his vehicle would not stand out for being at Tara's house. HD did phone Faye Grinstead around 12:15 am Monday morning sitting in front of Tara's home and Faye in turn phoned Mrs. Portier to see if she had seen Tara."
Last edited by Hotwater; 03-19-2006 at 04:40 PM.
|
|

03-18-2006, 11:05 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 107
|
|
|
My God!! That's all my heart will let me say for now. Gotta swallow hard and think on this one.
|
|

03-18-2006, 11:45 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 107
|
|
|
Okey Dokey....somebody correct me if I am wrong.....I thought Tara's mom called the Portier's around 10:00 pm and asking them to check on Tara. I don't remember it being at 12:15 a.m.?????
|
|

03-19-2006, 12:06 AM
|
|
|
|
Let me get this straight, the perpetrator returned to Taras home sometime after 12:15am Monday but HD was sitting in front of her home at 12:15 am and phone her mom? I take it her car wasnt there then and it wasnt there at all Sunday? Someone please enlighten me.
|
|

03-19-2006, 12:07 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 381
|
|
|
This is from transcripts of Nancy Graces' interview with Faye...
snip'
GRACE: When did you start becoming suspicious?
GRINSTEAD: Well, I started calling her that afternoon and she did not answer the phone. And I didn`t think too much about it at first, but she never called me back. I left her a message and she didn`t call me back because I`d call both phones. But I really didn`t start to get worried until later on in the late afternoon. And when she had not called me back, I began to get concerned then.
GRACE: Did you call the neighbors?
GRINSTEAD: I did not call the neighbors until very late Saturday night, Sunday night...
GRACE: So you did call Sunday night?
GRINSTEAD: Sunday night.
GRACE: Right.
GRINSTEAD: I did not call her Saturday night. It was very late, say 12:30 or 1:00. I did call the neighbors to see if a car was home or if anything looked unusual.
GRACE: What did they say?
GRINSTEAD: They didn`t seem to think anything looked unusual, that the car was there. They had been gone all day and didn`t get back until late, but they said the car was there. Nothing looked unusual.
|
|

03-19-2006, 12:11 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 381
|
|
|
Re: Big News
Quote:
Originally posted by fsbiii
WWW.FINDTARA.COM
Dr. Godwin says:
"Tara was attacked and abducted between 11:05 PM Sat. night and 5:00 AM Sunday morning. The perpetrator returned to Tara's home sometime Monday morning after 12:15 am and dropped the latex glove. This suggests that the perpetrator was very comfortable with being in the area and his vehicle would not stand out for being at Tara's house. HD did phone Faye Grinstead around 12:15 am Monday morning sitting in front of Tara's home and Faye in turn phoned Mrs. Portier to see if she had seen Tara."
|
It seems to me that he has pointed his finger right at HD. "The perpetrator" returned. When did the word get corrected to "perpetrator"?
Last edited by Hotwater; 03-19-2006 at 04:42 PM.
|
|

03-19-2006, 12:23 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 107
|
|
Thanks NancyC
I was looking for that. Just couldn't remember if it was NG or Greta interview that had the info. I stand corrected......God I hope this will turn up something.
|
|

03-19-2006, 12:31 AM
|
|
|
Thats how I read it too. I think The perp came after HD left.
Good Job Dr.
|
|

03-19-2006, 12:35 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 107
|
|
|
Having a Jerk Reaction
OK. HD is sitting in front of house.....Car is home.....Assuming HD can't get Tara to answer phone, so calls her mom....Mom calls neighbor....Neighbor says everything looks fine.....Did neighbor see HD's vehicle? Was Tara already gone? This is so confusing folks. Somebody help me think here.
|
|

03-19-2006, 12:42 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 381
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Big News
Quote:
Originally posted by popcorn
The perpetrator returned and HD have nothing to do with each other. I read it as the prepetrator returned after HD left.
|
Maybe I read it wrong, but you do call this perfect timing or what?
The Dr. says the glove was left after 12:15, is this because HD said it was not there when he was there? He must have knocked and walked around, to say this. I cannot see him so worried as to leave 20 calls and drive down to check and not do something when he gets there. Just calls her Mother. He is a LE guy. why not get some help. He knew her troubles lately. Makes no sense.
Why not call the Ocilla police out and try to find Tara that very night or early am?
|
|

03-19-2006, 12:50 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 107
|
|
|
I have to wonder what the conversation was between Faye and HD. Guess they both took the word of the neighbor, that all was ok. Do we know if Faye called HD back? Still a lot we don't know.
|
|

03-19-2006, 12:55 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 417
|
|
|
Board pls help me with clarifications:
Monday morning
12:15 am
At this point the school has already noticed an absent teacher. Who do they call if she is absent?
HD does not get a hold of Tara on the weekend. On Monday he drives to her house.
He comes to her house and he can't get her to answer the door or phone, but her car is there.
He doesn't notice any latex glove in the yard at this time. He calls Tara's mom while at the house and asks if she has seen her.
Where did HD go after he called Faye?
By the time Faye calls the neighbors HD has left?
The neighbors look out the window, see nothing wrong, the car is there and stuff is normal looking so they don't go to the house to check.
THIS IS ON A SCHOOL DAY? It's not normal for her car to be home on a school day is it?
When does JP head over to the house and find the glove?
|
|

03-19-2006, 01:24 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 417
|
|
Ok, Ok, then it works out in my head and it fits with the other details better... lots to keep track of!
Shakes off the cobwebs and keeps on clicking the pieces of the jigsaw puzzle faster and faster into the already framed timeline. I'm pretty comfortable with the facts all the way up to but not yet including...Tara's current location.
If "I" can make this click and I don't have the edge the real LE's have, then they can do the same puzzle even faster and probably have.
I feel what we have now is the need to have a winnable and prosecutable case. While it is not impossible to convict without Tara being found, it would make it easier to have those forensics.
These icons are for a few people who are not likely reading these boards, but might be and they know who they are.
 YOU ARE GOING DOWN.
|
|

03-19-2006, 02:11 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 282
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by NancynNC
This is from transcripts of Nancy Graces' interview with Faye...
snip'
GRACE: When did you start becoming suspicious?
GRINSTEAD: Well, I started calling her that afternoon and she did not answer the phone. And I didn`t think too much about it at first, but she never called me back. I left her a message and she didn`t call me back because I`d call both phones. But I really didn`t start to get worried until later on in the late afternoon. And when she had not called me back, I began to get concerned then.
GRACE: Did you call the neighbors?
GRINSTEAD: I did not call the neighbors until very late Saturday night, Sunday night...
GRACE: So you did call Sunday night?
GRINSTEAD: Sunday night.
GRACE: Right.
GRINSTEAD: I did not call her Saturday night. It was very late, say 12:30 or 1:00. I did call the neighbors to see if a car was home or if anything looked unusual.
GRACE: What did they say?
GRINSTEAD: They didn`t seem to think anything looked unusual, that the car was there. They had been gone all day and didn`t get back until late, but they said the car was there. Nothing looked unusual.
|
i would assume that faye and HD talked Sunday that they cant get a hold of Tara and faye asked HD to check on Tara because mr portier didn t get back to them then probably HD promised to go there after work. He went there at 12;15am then called back faye to let her know that Tara's car is there but no one is answering . As an experienced LE, HD checked on the area and didnt find any glove there so that could mean that the perpetrator arrived after HD left and left the glove.
I would think that it was HD looking for Tara and probably asking Faye if Tara is there because he cannot get a hold of her. It was probably HD's call who prompted Faye to call Mr Portier also to check on Tara.
__________________
All Post Above Are My Opinions Only
Last edited by Babes; 03-19-2006 at 02:15 AM.
|
|

03-19-2006, 02:44 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 282
|
|
|
Re: Big News
Quote:
Originally posted by fsbiii
WWW.FINDTARA.COM
Dr. Godwin says:
"Tara was attacked and abducted between 11:05 PM Sat. night and 5:00 AM Sunday morning. The perpetrator returned to Tara's home sometime Monday morning after 12:15 am and dropped the latex glove. This suggests that the perpetrator was very comfortable with being in the area and his vehicle would not stand out for being at Tara's house. HD did phone Faye Grinstead around 12:15 am Monday morning sitting in front of Tara's home and Faye in turn phoned Mrs. Portier to see if she had seen Tara."
|
Based on this statement i would think that Godwin is pointing the finger more on MH.... why? because of the time of the abduction he is giving us which is up to 5am Sunday Morning. What made him say 5am Sunday morning and not 6am or 7am and so on? Because 5am is the time MH went home... Do you have any other reasons why would Dr Godwin say up to 5am Sunday?
__________________
All Post Above Are My Opinions Only
Last edited by Hotwater; 03-19-2006 at 04:43 PM.
|
|

03-19-2006, 02:48 AM
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Big News
Quote:
Originally posted by Babes
Based on this statement i would think that Godwin is pointing the finger more on MH.... why? because of the time of the abduction he is giving us which is up to 5am Sunday Morning. What made him say 5am Sunday morning and not 6am or 7am and so on? Because 5am is the time MH went home... Do you have any other reasons why would Dr Godwin say up to 5am Sunday?
|
:lol:
|
|

03-19-2006, 02:52 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 381
|
|
|
Re: Re: Big News
Quote:
Originally posted by Babes
Based on this statement i would think that Godwin is pointing the finger more on MH.... why? because of the time of the abduction he is giving us which is up to 5am Sunday Morning. What made him say 5am Sunday morning and not 6am or 7am and so on? Because 5am is the time MH went home... Do you have any other reasons why would Dr Godwin say up to 5am Sunday?
|
He must have discarded the witness that said a truck was parked at Tara's at 5:30 am.
|
|

03-19-2006, 07:47 AM
|
|
|
This helps us out more than we know!!!
First, Dr. Godwin is saying 11:05 p.m. Saturday evening till 5 a.m. Sunday morning. There must be a reason he is saying 11:05 p.m. Maybe this was based on what HD said but maybe this is the time some one last spoke with her on the phone. It didnt really say. Second, If some one did attack or take her, that leaves then only one hour 10 mins before they returned again to the start point. Which tells us if we figure the time spent for the attack, the drive to where ever they took or put her, and the drive back means she isant too far from her home.
Also, the mud on her tires....If we can search weather for that time frame, day b4 ect, then we may be able to determine what roads would have been mud like that on those days, maybe all, it could have rained, or maybe not. Some may still have been muddy because maybe they remain muddy for a time after due to where they are located. Also, gives us a time frame to look at those that could be responsible, as to,,, what where they doing the following day?? How were they acting?? Anything out of the norm?? This all gives us something to go on from here
|
|

03-19-2006, 11:15 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,919
|
|
|
Does anyone know how far the burned house is from Tara's house? Is it on a dirt road or is the drive way at the house dirt vs. concrete?
|
|

03-19-2006, 11:34 AM
|
 |
Super Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: www.findtara.com
Posts: 2,673
|
|
|
Approximately 7 miles East-South-East of Tara's home, according to Yahoo! maps.
It is on a dirt road, Snapdragon Rd, which is off Satilla Rd.
|
|

03-19-2006, 12:06 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,919
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by fsbiii
Approximately 7 miles East-South-East of Tara's home, according to Yahoo! maps.
It is on a dirt road, Snapdragon Rd, which is off Satilla Rd.
|
Bells keep ringing. I would hope someone gets dirt samples from this road and sends it to Dr. Godwin for comparison to the clay found on Tara's car.
|
|

03-19-2006, 03:14 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: AL
Posts: 20
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by GeneralLee
First, I'd like to disagree with one thing here. I thought that Tara made 3 phone calls from her home after returning from the cookout.
The last call was reported to be at 12:30 AM on Sunday morning.
IMO, she couldn't have been abducted between 11:05 pm on Saturday evening and 12:30 AM on Sunday morning if she was making phone calls between that time. I respectfully disagree with Dr. Godwin on the time of abduction being as early as 11:05 pm Saturday night.
|
Do we know for a fact that Tara made all 3 phone calls? It could have be a friend or a perpetrator instead.
|
|

03-19-2006, 04:46 PM
|
|
Forum Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 128
|
|
|
correction
Quote:
fsbiii
Big News
WWW.FINDTARA.COM
Dr. Godwin says:
"Tara was attacked and abducted between 11:05 PM Sat. night and 5:00 AM Sunday morning. The perpetrator returned to Tara's home sometime Monday morning after 12:15 am and dropped the latex glove. This suggests that the perpetrator was very comfortable with being in the area and his vehicle would not stand out for being at Tara's house. HD did phone Faye Grinstead around 12:15 am Monday morning sitting in front of Tara's home and Faye in turn phoned Mrs. Portier to see if she had seen Tara."
Last edited by Hotwater on 03-19-2006 at 04:40 PM
|
I checked Findtara.com and the original quote used the word "perpetrator." I changed the quotes here to reflect that.
--Hh20
|
|

03-19-2006, 04:53 PM
|
|
|
|
Re: correction
Quote:
Originally posted by Hotwater
I checked Findtara.com and the original quote used the word "perpetrator." I changed the quotes here to reflect that.
--Hh20
|
Thanks Hotwater, for the info...
|
|

03-19-2006, 06:35 PM
|
 |
Super Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: www.findtara.com
Posts: 2,673
|
|
|
Actually, the original posting said "killer," and it was changed about an hour later. I couldn't edit the original posting here, but I wanted to point that out to avoid the impression I somehow put "killer" in the statement--when it was the actual wording used by Dr. Godwin in the release posted on the site before amendment.
|
|

03-19-2006, 07:05 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,919
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by fsbiii
Actually, the original posting said "killer," and it was changed about an hour later. I couldn't edit the original posting here, but I wanted to point that out to avoid the impression I somehow put "killer" in the statement--when it was the actual wording used by Dr. Godwin in the release posted on the site before amendment.
|
We all know what you meant.
|
|

03-19-2006, 11:43 PM
|
|
|
|
Someone made the comment about Dr Godwin pointing a finger at HD. I don't believe that is what he is doing. I believe he is giving a timeline as to when the perp returned. I believe he is saying when HD was at her house, there wasn't a glove in the yard, therefore if he was there at 12:15am, then that means the perp returned to her home sometime after 12:15am. When I first read the statement I was thinking the same thing about pointing a finger at HD, until I read it again correctly.
|
|

03-20-2006, 12:08 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 48
|
|
|
Dr. Godwin states that Tara disappeared Sat night / Sunday Morn.
He then states that someone very familiar with the area returned and dropped the glove sometime Mon morning after 12:15am.
HD was there at this time and is in LE with access to gloves.
Ring Tara up to 20 times on the Sunday????? and then drive down to her house in the early hours of the morning. Then ring her Mum to see if she has had contact with her. Could he have been setting up his involvement for a reason?
There is something a little too fishy in all of this.
Did Tara want to go public with a relationship? Or is he just a concerned friend. It is hard to know.
Because Tara was a popular person there are so many players in this. That is why evidence is so important.
Lets hope they find some more soon.
|
|

03-20-2006, 12:25 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 282
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Candace
I am having trouble getting my question answered...Pls, if you know, was Dr. Godwin threatened recently? tia
|
Candace
Link is right here:
http://boards.courttv.com/showthread...hreadid=258881
__________________
All Post Above Are My Opinions Only
|
|

03-20-2006, 04:41 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 105
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Aussie
Dr. Godwin states that Tara disappeared Sat night / Sunday Morn.
He then states that someone very familiar with the area returned and dropped the glove sometime Mon morning after 12:15am.
HD was there at this time and is in LE with access to gloves.
Ring Tara up to 20 times on the Sunday????? and then drive down to her house in the early hours of the morning. Then ring her Mum to see if she has had contact with her. Could he have been setting up his involvement for a reason?
There is something a little too fishy in all of this.
Did Tara want to go public with a relationship? Or is he just a concerned friend. It is hard to know.
Because Tara was a popular person there are so many players in this. That is why evidence is so important.
Lets hope they find some more soon.
|
MOO - According to the most recent CL article, Dr. Godwin does not suspect HD. In fact he bases part of his time line (the 12:15 a.m.) on HD being there and not seeing the glove.
But how would HD even notice the glove at that hour? Was it stuck to the doorbell? I thought it was out in the yard with the leaves. And now, after how many months, a second dog appears?
Is this science?
|
|

03-20-2006, 04:56 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 417
|
|
|
The pumpkin was still lit up.
|
|

03-20-2006, 04:59 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 381
|
|
|
If HD gets out and walks around the house, callls Tara on the home phone or cellular, can he not hear it ringing through the window or door?
|
|

03-23-2006, 09:20 AM
|
|
|
Bumping this thread.
Something came to mind: In the article benhill found regarding HD (where HD says he hadn't seen T in weeks) ... I have to admit that HD did not say he hadn't been by T's house in weeks. He said he hadn't seen her. Or so he claimed. However they were having an affair so something's up there.
(Just trying to clarify what's actually been reported against what actually alleged to have happened.)
Anyone else find it suspicious that HD was right outside T's house after calling and calling her all day Sunday - and also think his actions (silence) have been strange?
If he didn't want exposure due to his affair, then why didn't he call LE to go check on Tara - or alert her mom to T's 'real danger'? He apparently knew them all well enough to be trusted, right?
|
|

03-23-2006, 09:28 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 381
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by jela72
Bumping this thread.
Something came to mind: In the article benhill found regarding HD (where HD says he hadn't seen T in weeks) ... I have to admit that HD did not say he hadn't been by T's house in weeks. He said he hadn't seen her. Or so he claimed. However they were having an affair so something's up there.
(Just trying to clarify what's actually been reported against what actually alleged to have happened.)
Anyone else find it suspicious that HD was right outside T's house after calling and calling her all day Sunday - and also think his actions (silence) have been strange?
If he didn't want exposure due to his affair, then why didn't he call LE to go check on Tara - or alert her mom to T's 'real danger'? He apparently knew them all well enough to be trusted, right?
|
We do not know for a fact that they were having an affair.
|
|

03-23-2006, 09:45 AM
|
|
|
Yikes, Nancy! Really? Despite an article, posters, friends, etc stating they wre dating? Geeez, that's dangerous. From all I've read (including some articles) I truly believe they were seeing each other on the quiet.
The only thing that would 'release' HD from my (personal) radar, lol, is if he was specifically asked by Tara to follow and or look out for her.
Did Tara share the 'real danger' she apparently believed she was in with anyone else outside of HD?
|
|

03-23-2006, 09:55 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 381
|
|
|
From what CTV Library said HD went to the school to see Tara on 10/13 when she left school early. That is 9 days before she disappeared. Maybe he considers that 2 weeks since he last seen her.
Could you post a link to the articles that say they were having an affair? I know some posters have suggested that but you cannot believe all that is posted.
|
|

03-23-2006, 10:11 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Justice4Tara
They were not having an affair. He is a trusted friend of the entire family. He tried to help Tara when he realized things concerning MH. If any of you females have never had a protective male (platonic) friend, then you can't relate to this easily.
|
I agree that if he was a family friend and if I can find that quote from some of her family regarding how he had always been close to them and she felt like she could depend on him when things became bad for her as far as MH, AV, etc. go. I am still looking for the quote from her family. I have had platonic friends as well so I am trying to keep an open mind about HD and Tara.
|
|

03-23-2006, 10:14 AM
|
|
|
Hi Nancy
I read it recently (and still looking for that article) meantime, I did see an article in Crime Library posted by Marilyn - entitled something along lines of "Previous Relationships Could Throw Light on Missing Woman".
I've copied the link and am not so good on this board about pasting it - in case I blow the margins.
3/4 down the article, it talks about an LE officer she had dated - and who had turned up at her school on one occasion when she'd been upset.
But I know I saw a more recent article. Will try and source it
|
|

03-23-2006, 10:24 AM
|
|
|
|
Thanks, R.
Also, Nancy & R, it's been further alleged that Tara was upset with MH's friend in LE (SF) who had passed on private information when AV was banging on her door. When SF arrived, it's alleged that HD was inside (late at night) with Tara.
Tara later apparently dropped charges. However - it was the leaking of this personal information that upset Tara.
I have no link - other than to say this was discussed here in (i think) 2 threads. Am sure other posters can recall more precisely.
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:15 PM.
|
|
Advertisement
|