As long as the national association of man boy love is allowed to meet and have protected membership list and printed pamphlets and online literature this is all irrelevant.
We have to choose between rights and protection.
I am sure at some point in our nations history 1st,4th,6th, and 8th amendents issues were supreme. Rights and protections were extended in an effort to allevate the governments power to harrass and abuse those among us who were different.. I get that was very important and I think for the most part except for the occassional overzealous prosecutor or small minded judge the alternative is recognized and protected fairly well.
But the pendulium has swung. Justice now has to weigh the individuals right to free whatever versus the a childs life. It is no longer about some lofty legal principle that defines our social evolution it is life on the line. The only job imo the government is obligated to do. Children should be able to play in the front yard or sleep in their own home.
Anyone who sexually engages a child under 16 is LWOP. I mean because some 13 year olds are sexually active or think they want sex we can't punish the 46 year old. Come on its a pretty clear line. No one over 18 can ever under any circumstance even MARRIAGE or COMMON LAW or permission from the parents have sex with someone 15 or under.
NO ONE OVER 18 CAN HAVE SEXUAL CONTACT WITH SOMEONE UNDER 16.
First Offense = 20-life
SEXUAL CONTACT WITH SOMEONE UNDER 13
First Offense = LWOP
Violent Sexual Assualt on a child = LWOP
Death of a Child = Death
and yes that does include all the freaky femal pedophiles posing as teachers.
WHY IS THIS SO HARD?
SOMEBODY PLEASE TELL ME WHY WE CAN'T PROTECT OUR CHILDREN.