Continue here ----->
R
Closed Thread
Results 1 to 40 of 874
Thread: Discussion Thread 2007 (Part 4)
-
10-10-2007 01:42 PM #1
Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Posts
- 625
Discussion Thread 2007 (Part 4)
-
10-10-2007 01:46 PM #2
Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 104
IMO Beth did run the show. And as soon as she got the ear of Jossy the publicity seeker and teller of tales it got even worse. What do you mean "she doesn't speak the language"? They speak english.
-
10-10-2007 01:49 PM #3
a new beginning
And finally, to complete the cable realness, Natalee Holloway's mother bounced out and declared, "When Rita came to Aruba, she had one mission—to seek justice!"
VOICE♥♥Luke Davis will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors, omissions or duplicate links from any of the hereinabove. This may be regarded as opinion only.♥♥
-
10-10-2007 03:25 PM #4
-
10-10-2007 03:31 PM #5
OMG
Fasten your seatbeats and get out the dramamine!!
Amazon.com Sales Rank: #846 in Books
Down over 300 in just 1 day!!Barack Obama: UN Ambassador 2008.
-
10-10-2007 04:02 PM #6♥♥Luke Davis will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors, omissions or duplicate links from any of the hereinabove. This may be regarded as opinion only.♥♥

-
10-10-2007 04:14 PM #7
-
10-10-2007 04:43 PM #8
For some, ginger works well to defeat extreme motion sickness
Amazon.com Sales Rank: #960 in Books
Better note the time as the book is dropping about 80 positions an hour: 5:25 pm Wed
Once when she was in Texas Beth auctioned off a "Call me Hootie" poster.
Maybe if she gives away hootie posters with the books?
IMOBarack Obama: UN Ambassador 2008.
-
10-10-2007 06:53 PM #9
-
10-10-2007 07:29 PM #10
<*R>
Well Heyes .... Personally, I think it's noteworthy. Do you think people might be learning, by word of mouth, that the "TRUTH" of the kidnapping in Aruba .... is just NOT in that book !!?? As Aruba Steve said today, you would think the truth would be revealed, backed up by some FACTS.
JMOLast edited by Riviera; 10-10-2007 at 08:45 PM. Reason: Removed quote
It is planned speeches that contain lies or dissimulations, not what you blurt out so spontaneously in one instant.
~~~TENNESSEE WILLIAMS, Forward to Sweet Bird of Youth~~~
-
10-10-2007 07:38 PM #11
It is an eyeopener, FM. Dave's book is hovering around 14,000, I would be willing to bet that Beth's book is at the same level pretty soon now. So far I haven't seen that the word "kidnapping" is even addressed in the text. Kinda like in some places south of the border they say "salmon" on the can of fish in big letters, and then when you open the can it's ground up tuna.
IMOBarack Obama: UN Ambassador 2008.
-
10-10-2007 08:06 PM #12
Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Posts
- 625
I suggest everyone stay on topic and stop with the personal insults.
Thank you
R
-
10-10-2007 08:38 PM #13
Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Posts
- 625
Please send your personal grievances either through pm or the report a post option. They do not belong on the open forum. If the bickering/personal insults continue you will leave me no other option than to lock this thread. For how long? I will leave that up to Freshwater.
Thank you
R
<*Posts Deleted>Last edited by Riviera; 10-10-2007 at 10:23 PM.
-
10-10-2007 09:30 PM #14
Barnes and Noble sales rank..... Oct 10 Sales Rank: 2741
Barnesandnoble.comBarack Obama: UN Ambassador 2008.
-
10-10-2007 09:39 PM #15
-
10-10-2007 11:33 PM #16
I think we all got what we expected. I was hoping for more but nothing really caught my attention.
Beth could have put so much into the book, answered so many questions but she chose not to.
I would like to have learned more about the chaperones. Were they Natalee's teachers? Did they see her in the car with the island guys?
What about GVC? Was he grabbing Natalee on the dance floor? Did the MB guys get in a scuffle with him?
And GVC's friend Steve Croes? He still has me baffled. And so much more.
But no. We hear about a restaurant, going to the laundry and handing out prayer cards. I don't want to hear about Beth. I want to know about the kidnapping.
So, I'll wait and hope something comes out in the Kalpoe lawsuit.
♥♥Luke Davis will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors, omissions or duplicate links from any of the hereinabove. This may be regarded as opinion only.♥♥
-
10-10-2007 11:59 PM #17
Luke .... You absolutely summed it all up. We have constantly heard about all the proof she claims to have .... about what she has to say that will "shock the world".
Her Foundation is dedicated to telling "Natalee's Story", when none of it has ever been proven .... not to mention her constant accusations of three people of crimes so terrible, again without proof.
JMOIt is planned speeches that contain lies or dissimulations, not what you blurt out so spontaneously in one instant.
~~~TENNESSEE WILLIAMS, Forward to Sweet Bird of Youth~~~
-
10-11-2007 12:09 AM #18
Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 441
-
10-11-2007 12:13 AM #19
-
10-11-2007 12:26 AM #20
Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 441
-
10-11-2007 12:29 AM #21
Grandad .... I have to tell you, I was actually WONDERING about the book, especially when I saw the subtitle on the front cover . I thought maybe she DID have something that was going to be news to us all .... something solid .... something FACTUAL about the "Kidnapping". It didn't take me long to find out that the TRUTH of the "kidnapping" was never divulged in the book .... from what I understand, it's just an elaboration of what we've heard for over 2 years.
JMOIt is planned speeches that contain lies or dissimulations, not what you blurt out so spontaneously in one instant.
~~~TENNESSEE WILLIAMS, Forward to Sweet Bird of Youth~~~
-
10-11-2007 12:33 AM #22It is planned speeches that contain lies or dissimulations, not what you blurt out so spontaneously in one instant.
~~~TENNESSEE WILLIAMS, Forward to Sweet Bird of Youth~~~
-
10-11-2007 12:53 AM #23Why Oh Why does Anita lie ?
"Joran is maybe not lying, but is like trying to cover up a little bit" ~ Anita Van der Sloot ~ Abrams Report 6/24/05
-
10-11-2007 01:04 AM #24Joran VDS ~ Primetime Live Interview 2/23/06:
Q. "Why should you be believed after all of the lying that you have done in this situation?"
A. "There is absolutely no reason to believe me."
Q. "Would you believe you?"
A. "Um I wouldn't probably not believe myself no."
-
10-11-2007 01:07 AM #25Joran VDS ~ Primetime Live Interview 2/23/06:
Q. "Why should you be believed after all of the lying that you have done in this situation?"
A. "There is absolutely no reason to believe me."
Q. "Would you believe you?"
A. "Um I wouldn't probably not believe myself no."
-
10-11-2007 01:09 AM #26
-
10-11-2007 01:12 AM #27Joran VDS ~ Primetime Live Interview 2/23/06:
Q. "Why should you be believed after all of the lying that you have done in this situation?"
A. "There is absolutely no reason to believe me."
Q. "Would you believe you?"
A. "Um I wouldn't probably not believe myself no."
-
10-11-2007 01:21 AM #28
Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 441
-
10-11-2007 01:25 AM #29Joran VDS ~ Primetime Live Interview 2/23/06:
Q. "Why should you be believed after all of the lying that you have done in this situation?"
A. "There is absolutely no reason to believe me."
Q. "Would you believe you?"
A. "Um I wouldn't probably not believe myself no."
-
10-11-2007 01:31 AM #30
-
10-11-2007 01:34 AM #31Joran VDS ~ Primetime Live Interview 2/23/06:
Q. "Why should you be believed after all of the lying that you have done in this situation?"
A. "There is absolutely no reason to believe me."
Q. "Would you believe you?"
A. "Um I wouldn't probably not believe myself no."
-
10-11-2007 01:35 AM #32
Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 441
-
10-11-2007 02:02 AM #33http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/...44_page3.shtml“Bringing in the prime suspect is basically the last thing we do," Dompig explains. "When we bring you in, we probably already know the story because we have observed. We have talked to all your friends. We have checked your phone line. We have done everything that is technically possible to know about your whereabouts.”
Here is just one, spin it any way you want (prime/primary, lol), but Dompig is clearly speaking of JK2. I am confident there are more out there, but I am to tired tonight to search further.
imo
Why Oh Why does Anita lie ?
"Joran is maybe not lying, but is like trying to cover up a little bit" ~ Anita Van der Sloot ~ Abrams Report 6/24/05
-
10-11-2007 02:04 AM #34
Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Posts
- 625
Here's the deal folks. I've been getting non-stop reports from this forum. 1st it was the "Loving Natlie" thread - end result - Locked. Then it was the Discussion Thread Part 3 - end result - Locked. Now I'm getting reports about Discussion Thread Part 4 and you haven't even made it to the 2nd page yet?
My advice is this --->
Step away from your keyboard or step away from this particular topic for a few days. Crime Library offers plenty of other topics/forums to post on - maybe a change would do you good?
My only other option is to start banning people - which forces you to take a vacation from posting here. I do not want to lock this thread because a few of you can't be civil - it's simply not fair to the others.
Thank you
R
-
10-11-2007 07:25 AM #35
Super Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 3,199
I think it's common sense to determine J2K are the primary suspects in this case.
They were the last three known persons to be seen with a living, Natalee Holloway.
They are proven, admitted liars who changed their story after being taken into custody.
Their versions don't match up, and they lack corroboration for their stories.
Joran and the Kalpoes' detentions were prolonged, and the Kalpoes were re-arrested, and they all three were held for periods of time on reasonable suspicion of involvement in alleged crimes of kidnap, rape & murder.
Joran's court bid to have himself officially cleared as a suspect was unsuccessful.
This Spring when Dutch investigators came to Aruba, they searched the van der Sloot property and visited the Kalpoe home.
And, Dompig told Dan Abrams all paths lead back to J2K.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9676188/page/2/
-
10-11-2007 08:25 AM #36
Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 441
Nice try, but that statement would make all suspects the primary suspect.
Dompig is not clearly referring to anyone.
If you have a few spare days, read everything ever written about the case and see if you can find one reference to any official statement by ALE or the prosecutor officially designating anyone as the "prime" or "primary" suspect.
-
10-11-2007 08:34 AM #37
Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 441
-
10-11-2007 08:50 AM #38
Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 441
Also from No Nic's link (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/...4_page5.shtml).
"And there’s another stunning revelation from the authorities: Though they’re convinced Holloway is dead, they tell 48 Hours that they believe she was not murdered."
And, "We’re not talking about killers here."
Seems Dompig doesn't agree with the experts on this board.
-
10-11-2007 09:28 AM #39
-
10-11-2007 09:54 AM #40
Common sense or no common sense, there was never an official, published, ranking coming from the prosecutors office or ALE as to a ranking of the suspects...primary, secondary, tertiary, etc.
Also, on Abrams, Dompig told Abrams that Twitty was mistaken about having a document that supposedly said that Joran took Natalee to his house and had sex with her. Abrams asked Twitty, paraphrased, if she wanted some time to compose herself. Point being, quotes from Dompig can be used to bolster any point of view in the case.
IMOBarack Obama: UN Ambassador 2008.






