Phone records!

[frydaddy]

Has anyone spent any serious time on the phone records? I was just curious if I am the only one interested in discussing them? I recall making a short mention about them on another thread, but no discussion took place. If no one is interested in analyzing them, it's no problem if this thread tanks. But, I do have a couple questions for both sides of the debate, since they may be able to help fill in the blanks.

1. Marlene has on her site some cell tower information, such as addresses that go with the tower numbers. The log used to translate these numbers into addresses is sealed and I have been unable to find any data on them. Anyone have a clue?

2. Cell switches...does anyone know if the Commerce switch is located near Commerce, California? I'm assuming it is, but we know what happens with that!

3. Has anyone used Intellus before? It's supposedly a membership site that allows one to see the names of people with unlisted numbers. This information would be helpful to decipher the phone records, but I don't want to waste money unless I know I can mine the data that I need.

4. I'll be the first to admit, while I'm savvy on technology, I get lost pretty easily on cell stuff because it seems rather abstract in how it works. For example, figuring out Scott's voice mail on the fraud records is akin to solving a Rubik's cube in the dark. Anyone broke that code?

Any thoughts?

[TopGunner]

Great thread FD! Let's discuss the cell records showing ISP near home at 10:12 AM on the morning of the 24th, when he said he left at 9:30 AM, shall we???

[frydaddy]

Here's a starter...

On Dec 26th, Scott called an attorney named Robert Louis, at 3:03 p.m. It appears Mr. Louis was a disability attorney? Anyone know anything about this? Was he planning to see if Laci's "disappearance" was an acceptable method of acquiring disability pay while he sorted things out? The call lasted 7:49, in case anyone's interested.

Other attorney calls...

George Arata (Tradecorp atty) - Dec 26 - 3:19 p.m. - 4 min 34 sec
Kirk McAllister - 13:44 - 1/2/2003 - 1 min 21 sec
Kirk McAllister - 16:21 - 1/2/2003 - 7 min 1 sec
Kirk McAllister - 16:52 - 1/3/2003 - 2 min 16 sec
Kirk McAllister - 13:15 - 1/4/2003 - no connect
Kirk McAllister - 12:47 - 1/6/2003 - 2 min 56 sec
Kirk McAllister - 9:36 - 1/7/2007 - 3 min 42 sec
Kirk McAllister - 10:39 - 1/7/2007 - no connect
Kirk McAllister - 10:39 - 1/7/2007 - 0 min 55 sec

Brief calls, but IMO, quite a few for an innocent man!

*Disclaimer* - These are simply calls pulled from the fraud reports, only tracks his cell phone use from 11/29/02--->1/7/03. Who knows what one could find using all phones available to Scott in this period!

[frydaddy]

Great thread FD! Let's discuss the cell records showing ISP near home at 10:12 AM on the morning of the 24th, when he said he left at 9:30 AM, shall we???

That's a start! But wasn't it 10:08?

[Lavindar]

That's a start! But wasn't it 10:08?

It was 10:08 and picked up by the Brighton Cell tower which was closest to the house. It then was picked up by the cell tower at 10&D (I believe that is the correct address) which would be the next logical tower if scott were going from his home to his work address.

One thing I DID notice looking at Scott cell phoen records. It would appear that he never answered his phone because he calls his own number VERY fre quently and the only reason for that would be to pick up messages.

[Lavindar]

WE can start with these:

http://www.scottisinnocent.com/Trial...hibit_203A.pdf

It still appears that he likes himself best cuz that's the most frequent number he seems to call

[One2Snoop]

Here's some info from crimenews2000 regarding the cell towers. I didn't try any of the links so I don't know if they work.

http://www.crimenews2000.com/lacipet...what4.htm#cell

THE CELL TOWERS

Tenth Street and D Street Location of cell tower that Scott Peterson accessed when checking his voice mail at 10:08 a.m. on December 24, 2002, as he was driving; related web site showing this tower as "Cell Tower #2": http://mapsonus.switchboard.com/bin/...c=1/isredir=1/

115 Frances Avenue Location of cell tower discussed during preliminary hearing testimony by Steve Jacobson

929 Woodland Avenue Location of cell tower that serviced Tradecorp Warehouse area; related web site showing this tower as "Cell Tower #3": http://mapsonus.switchboard.com/bin/...c=1/isredir=1/

1250 Brighton Avenue Location of cell tower that serviced area of Scott and Laci Peterson's home and which he accessed when checking his voice mail at 10:08 a.m. on December 24, 2002; according to Steve Jacobson, has a radius of 1.42 miles; related web site showing this tower as "Cell Tower #1": http://mapsonus.switchboard.com/bin/...c=1/isredir=1/

2600 Tenth Street, Berkeley Location of cell tower that serviced area of Berkeley Marina; accessed by Scott Peterson as he made calls between 2:12 and 2:17 p.m. on December 24, 2002, checking his voice mails and leaving messages at his home and on Laci Peterson's voice mail; according to Steve Jacobson, has a radius of 5.3 miles

4959 South Front Road, Livermore Location of cell tower that serviced area that Scott Peterson passed through on his way back from the Berkeley Marina on December 24, 2002, and which he used to make a call at 3:52 p.m. to his home, presumably from the Chevron station at 4904 South Front Road

6390 Grassland Drive, Castro Valley Location of cell tower that serviced area that Scott Peterson passed through on his way back from the Berkeley Marina on December 24, 2002, and which he used to make a call at 2:45 p.m. to San Diego Crating and Packing—presumably to speak with Lee or Jackie Peterson

9500 Stearns Avenue, Oakland Location of cell tower that serviced area that Scott Peterson passed through on his way back from the Berkeley Marina on December 24, 2002, and which he used to make a call to Greg and Kristen Reed at 2:34 p.m.; according to Steve Jacobson, has a radius of 0.9 miles

20103 Lake Chabot Road, Castro Valley Location of cell tower that serviced area that Scott Peterson passed through on his way back from the Berkeley Marina on December 24, 2002, and which he used to make a call at 2:40 p.m. to San Diego Crating and Packing—presumably to speak with Lee or Jackie Peterson

Keyes Location of cell tower that, according to August 23, 2004, trial testimony, serviced cellular telephone call placed by Scott Peterson from his front yard

Manteca Location of cell tower that, according to August 23, 2004, trial testimony, serviced cellular telephone call placed by Scott Peterson from his front yard

Newman Location of cell tower that, according to August 23, 2004, trial testimony, serviced cellular telephone call placed by Scott Peterson from his front yard

[frydaddy]

WE can start with these:

http://www.scottisinnocent.com/Trial...hibit_203A.pdf

It still appears that he likes himself best cuz that's the most frequent number he seems to call

LOL - I started with those weeks ago. I've purposely ignored the VM calls and any reference to his cell # because frankly, there's little to gain from them. You are dead on though, it's the most repeated number on those reports. There will likely be nothing "smoking gun-ish" on the records, but I can assure you that there's plenty of new info I wasn't aware of in the fraud logs.

There's a few tidbits I'd call "interesting".

Calls to Karen Servas between 12-24 and 1-6 = 5. Suddenly, they were chums.

The call from 1-6-07 to Kirk McAlliset was from the bay on one of the trips he took. Guess he wanted to inform Kirk whether or not to expect a burgling transient dropping by to request his services.

There's more, but I'm a bit tuckered.

[frydaddy]

Here's some info from crimenews2000 regarding the cell towers. I didn't try any of the links so I don't know if they work.

http://www.crimenews2000.com/lacipet...what4.htm#cell

THE CELL TOWERS

Tenth Street and D Street Location of cell tower that Scott Peterson accessed when checking his voice mail at 10:08 a.m. on December 24, 2002, as he was driving; related web site showing this tower as "Cell Tower #2": http://mapsonus.switchboard.com/bin/...c=1/isredir=1/

115 Frances Avenue Location of cell tower discussed during preliminary hearing testimony by Steve Jacobson

929 Woodland Avenue Location of cell tower that serviced Tradecorp Warehouse area; related web site showing this tower as "Cell Tower #3": http://mapsonus.switchboard.com/bin/...c=1/isredir=1/

1250 Brighton Avenue Location of cell tower that serviced area of Scott and Laci Peterson's home and which he accessed when checking his voice mail at 10:08 a.m. on December 24, 2002; according to Steve Jacobson, has a radius of 1.42 miles; related web site showing this tower as "Cell Tower #1": http://mapsonus.switchboard.com/bin/...c=1/isredir=1/

2600 Tenth Street, Berkeley Location of cell tower that serviced area of Berkeley Marina; accessed by Scott Peterson as he made calls between 2:12 and 2:17 p.m. on December 24, 2002, checking his voice mails and leaving messages at his home and on Laci Peterson's voice mail; according to Steve Jacobson, has a radius of 5.3 miles

4959 South Front Road, Livermore Location of cell tower that serviced area that Scott Peterson passed through on his way back from the Berkeley Marina on December 24, 2002, and which he used to make a call at 3:52 p.m. to his home, presumably from the Chevron station at 4904 South Front Road

6390 Grassland Drive, Castro Valley Location of cell tower that serviced area that Scott Peterson passed through on his way back from the Berkeley Marina on December 24, 2002, and which he used to make a call at 2:45 p.m. to San Diego Crating and Packing—presumably to speak with Lee or Jackie Peterson

9500 Stearns Avenue, Oakland Location of cell tower that serviced area that Scott Peterson passed through on his way back from the Berkeley Marina on December 24, 2002, and which he used to make a call to Greg and Kristen Reed at 2:34 p.m.; according to Steve Jacobson, has a radius of 0.9 miles

20103 Lake Chabot Road, Castro Valley Location of cell tower that serviced area that Scott Peterson passed through on his way back from the Berkeley Marina on December 24, 2002, and which he used to make a call at 2:40 p.m. to San Diego Crating and Packing—presumably to speak with Lee or Jackie Peterson

Keyes Location of cell tower that, according to August 23, 2004, trial testimony, serviced cellular telephone call placed by Scott Peterson from his front yard

Manteca Location of cell tower that, according to August 23, 2004, trial testimony, serviced cellular telephone call placed by Scott Peterson from his front yard

Newman Location of cell tower that, according to August 23, 2004, trial testimony, serviced cellular telephone call placed by Scott Peterson from his front yard

Thanks for this Snoopy! I never turn down information that may assist. Unfortunately, the four digit code listed on the fraud records is the key for me. If I only had the two sealed exhibits, I'd have me something! I could tell where Scott was virtually anytime through December and early January. Anyone know where and when he picked up the boat?

Appreciate the info!

[Lavindar]

Thanks for this Snoopy! I never turn down information that may assist. Unfortunately, the four digit code listed on the fraud records is the key for me. If I only had the two sealed exhibits, I'd have me something! I could tell where Scott was virtually anytime through December and early January. Anyone know where and when he picked up the boat?

Appreciate the info!

I am pretty sure it was the 9th that he picked it up. I'll go check testimony for you - Bruce Peterson lives on the east side of Modesto - over by Rumble and Oakdale.

DISTASO: Okay. So you got a call on Saturday, December the 7th, and when, did you set up a meeting for Mr. Peterson to come over and buy your boat?

PETERSON: Yeah. We agreed, well, he wanted to come over and look at the boat first. And he came over Sunday morning, the next day.

DISTASO: Okay. That was on the 8th? Scott picked it up on the 9th. Bruce Peterson lives over by Oakdale and Rumble near Naraghi Lake. That is N of the Peterson resident and a little East

[Cadillakin]

LOL - I started with those weeks ago. I've purposely ignored the VM calls and any reference to his cell # because frankly, there's little to gain from them. You are dead on though, it's the most repeated number on those reports. There will likely be nothing "smoking gun-ish" on the records, but I can assure you that there's plenty of new info I wasn't aware of in the fraud logs.

There's a few tidbits I'd call "interesting".

Calls to Karen Servas between 12-24 and 1-6 = 5. Suddenly, they were chums.

The call from 1-6-07 to Kirk McAlliset was from the bay on one of the trips he took. Guess he wanted to inform Kirk whether or not to expect a burgling transient dropping by to request his services.

There's more, but I'm a bit tuckered.

Good post. I've refrained from doing any studying.. it's tedious.. but I'll be interested in your further postings.

[frydaddy]

Last two phone calls on 12-6-02 were to Shawn. IIRC, these two calls were the confrontation about Scott being married and the discussion of Amber being told such.

Of the first five non-voice mail calls on 12-7-02, the first was to an unknown (so far) Nextel in Salinas, the remaining next four calls were to phone numbers contained in the boat ads found on Scott's computer, from a search run that morning. One of those was Bruce Peterson.

Odd that this boat became the first priority Scott dealt with after the exposure of his being married.

[TopGunner]

It was 10:08 and picked up by the Brighton Cell tower which was closest to the house. It then was picked up by the cell tower at 10&D (I believe that is the correct address) which would be the next logical tower if scott were going from his home to his work address.

One thing I DID notice looking at Scott cell phone records. It would appear that he never answered his phone because he calls his own number VERY fre quently and the only reason for that would be to pick up messages.

Opps guys, sorry on the 2 extra minutes I gave him. I was just tryin' to cut him some slack, LOL!!!!!

[frydaddy]

I asked previously about the Commerce switch and whether it was actually in Commerce, CA (near LA). I believe it is, based on the pattern of the phone switches on the fraud records. So, a quiz...

Based on the phone switch info on the fraud records for Dec 9 (late) & 10 (early), what can one conclude regarding Mrs. Medina's trial testimony?

[frydaddy]

Opps guys, sorry on the 2 extra minutes I gave him. I was just tryin' to cut him some slack, LOL!!!!!

We don't cut murderers slack TG, only the pee-poor witnesses for his defense team!

[Lavindar]

I asked previously about the Commerce switch and whether it was actually in Commerce, CA (near LA). I believe it is, based on the pattern of the phone switches on the fraud records. So, a quiz...

Based on the phone switch info on the fraud records for Dec 9 (late) & 10 (early), what can one conclude regarding Mrs. Medina's trial testimony?

This is a trick question, right?

[Cadillakin]

I asked previously about the Commerce switch and whether it was actually in Commerce, CA (near LA). I believe it is, based on the pattern of the phone switches on the fraud records. So, a quiz...

Based on the phone switch info on the fraud records for Dec 9 (late) & 10 (early), what can one conclude regarding Mrs. Medina's trial testimony?

Would somebody explain this to me. I thought Medina's testimony was only significant on the 23rd and 24th...

What does the 9th and 10th have to do with her?

[frydaddy]

This is a trick question, right?

Nope...what did Susan Medina say happened in the morning on Dec 10th? Where was Scott, according to the phone records?

[frydaddy]

Would somebody explain this to me. I thought Medina's testimony was only significant on the 23rd and 24th...

What does the 9th and 10th have to do with her?

It's about her credibility as a witness to anything, mainly the burglary info, for me.

[One2Snoop]

Nope...what did Susan Medina say happened in the morning on Dec 10th? Where was Scott, according to the phone records?

I'm confused. (nothing new LOL ) On the 10th there are phone records indicating where Scott was and Medina said something about it?

[Lavindar]

It's about her credibility as a witness to anything, mainly the burglary info, for me.

Was that the morning that she had the flat tire and scott helped her?



I win! I win!


HARRIS: December 10th right before 2002 before Laci disappeared, is that what you recall? Let me phrase it a different way. You had a, you ended up having a conversation with Scott Peterson after a day that you had a flat tire; is that true?

MEDINA: On the day that I had the flat tire.

HARRIS: Yeah. Could you tell us a little bit about what happened that day?

MEDINA: It was about 7:40, 7:45 in the morning. I was in my driveway. I noticed my rear, rear passenger tire, the one at the back,

HARRIS: Hm-hmm.

MEDINA: appears to be flat.

HARRIS: Okay. And then what happened after that?

MEDINA: I called my husband to let him know I may have a flat tire.

HARRIS: And did Scott Peterson come out of his house about that time?

MEDINA: He was in his driveway close to his pickup truck.

HARRIS: And what did he do?

MEDINA: He came to my driveway and asked me if I'm okay.

HARRIS: And what did you tell him?

MEDINA: And I told him that I think I have a flat tire.

HARRIS: Did he offer to do something at that point?

MEDINA: Yes, he did.

HARRIS: And what was that?

MEDINA: He offered to take me to a gas station to, so he could put gas, I mean, I'm sorry, he could put air into the tire.

HARRIS: Hm-hmm. And is that what you ended up doing?

MEDINA: No.

HARRIS: What did you end up actually doing?

MEDINA: He ended up giving me a ride to the appointment that I needed to make at 8:00 o'clock that morning.

HARRIS: And this was the first time you'd ever had any kind of a lengthy conversation with Scott?

MEDINA: Correct.

[Cadillakin]

I'm confused. (nothing new LOL ) On the 10th there are phone records indicating where Scott was and Medina said something about it?

Yeah, I think that's when Medina claimed Scott changed her tire... and gave her a ride...

I've got other reasons to question the accuracy of her memory.

[One2Snoop]

Yeah, I think that's when Medina claimed Scott changed her tire... and gave her a ride...

I've got other reasons to question the accuracy of her memory.

I thought that was December 5th?

[One2Snoop]

From CrimeNews2000 site....

December 5 Susan Medina notices the right rear tire on her Mercedes is dangerously low. Scott Peterson sees her circling her car and offers her a ride to an appointment. While on the way, he changes a business date by phone so he can go with Laci Peterson to an appointment, assumed by Susan Medina to be a checkup with Laci Peterson's obstetrician. Scott Peterson and Amber Frey speak by phone.

http://www.crimenews2000.com/lacipet...n/when0201.htm

[Cadillakin]

I thought that was December 5th?

Pat Harris: Okay. You never had really a lengthy conversation with either Scott or Laci before I believe was December 10th, is that your recollection?
Susan Medina: Yes.
Pat Harris: December 10th right before 2002 before Laci disappeared, is that what you recall? Let me phrase it a different way. You had a, you ended up having a conversation with Scott Peterson after a day that you had a flat tire; is that true?
Susan Medina: On the day that I had the flat tire.

[Lavindar]

[I] figured it out. Scott's cell phone records show him in the Los Angeles vicinity, nowhere near Covena or Modesto that morning when he was allegedly helping Susan Medina. Verrrrrrrrrrry interesting fry --and an [SIZE="4"]EXCELLENT[/SIZE] catch.

Unless Scott was driving an F18, he couldn't help her at 8am and be in the vicinity of LA in 2 hours - not even if he flew down.

[Cadillakin]

I don't know.. 5th or 10th.. doesn't really matter to me. Also, the testimony I quoted is a little convoluted and unclear..

[One2Snoop]

[I] figured it out. Scott's cell phone records show him in the Los Angeles vicinity, nowhere near Covena or Modesto that morning when he was allegedly helping Susan Medina. Verrrrrrrrrrry interesting fry --and an [SIZE="4"]EXCELLENT[/SIZE] catch.

Could she have been mistaken about the date? Maybe it was the 5th and not the 10th? According to the CN2000 site ( I know its not the bible LOL) it was the same day Laci had a doctor's appt.

[Cadillakin]

Could she have been mistaken about the date?

Yes............

[Lavindar]

Could she have been mistaken about the date? Maybe it was the 5th and not the 10th? According to the CN2000 site ( I know its not the bible LOL) it was the same day Laci had a doctor's appt.

It couldn't have been the same day as Laci's doc appt on the 23rd. So are you assuming it was the day of her Nov apptz?

Oh, love this part by Medina:

HARRIS: Does your job require a lot of notetaking?

MEDINA: Yes.

HARRIS: A lot of recordkeeping?

MEDINA: Yes.

So she is an excellent record keeper. She would know what day she had an appt with someone or not.

[Lavindar]

I do NOT believe she got the date wrong. She talks about being a trained record keeper for one thing. Another thing is that the 10th was a Tuesday and surely she would have written down an appointment. Since she basically works out of her home, she would know the days she had to go out for appointments. I think she was lying. I think she was so eager to paint Scott in a good light and I'm sure that colored her judgment in many ways.

[One2Snoop]

It couldn't have been the same day as Laci's doc appt on the 23rd. So are you assuming it was the day of her Nov apptz?

Oh, love this part by Medina:

HARRIS: Does your job require a lot of notetaking?

MEDINA: Yes.

HARRIS: A lot of recordkeeping?

MEDINA: Yes.

So she is an excellent record keeper. She would know what day she had an appt with someone or not.

I don't know. I was just trying to figure out which date is correct. I was going by what was posted below by CN2000 - so this info must be wrong? It also says Susan assumed it was a doctor's appt - sorry I didn't make that clear. My bad.

So Scott was in LA on the 10th?


December 5 Susan Medina notices the right rear tire on her Mercedes is dangerously low. Scott Peterson sees her circling her car and offers her a ride to an appointment. While on the way, he changes a business date by phone so he can go with Laci Peterson to an appointment, assumed by Susan Medina to be a checkup with Laci Peterson's obstetrician. Scott Peterson and Amber Frey speak by phone.

[Lavindar]

On the 5th he doesn't make a phone call until 10:30 and it's to his voice mail. Laci was seen in November and on the 23rd of Dec by her medical records. So I think you can toss out the 5th as the day Scott helped Susan with her flat tire.

[frydaddy]

[I] figured it out. Scott's cell phone records show him in the Los Angeles vicinity, nowhere near Covena or Modesto that morning when he was allegedly helping Susan Medina. Verrrrrrrrrrry interesting fry --and an [SIZE="4"]EXCELLENT[/SIZE] catch.

Unless Scott was driving an F18, he couldn't help her at 8am and be in the vicinity of LA in 2 hours - not even if he flew down.

Like I said, nothing earth shattering in the records, at this point anyway. If one had the Cell Tower Location charts that are sealed, as well as the means to find out who owns the unlisted numbers on Scott's phone log, perhaps we could get even more CE that corroborates Scott's guilt.

Truth is though, after reviewing them, I am even more convinced that he's guilty, just by the pattern of his phone use.

[frydaddy]

On the 5th he doesn't make a phone call until 10:30 and it's to his voice mail. Laci was seen in November and on the 23rd of Dec by her medical records. So I think you can toss out the 5th as the day Scott helped Susan with her flat tire.

Actually, keep in mind that the fraud records are in Eastern time, so his first call to voice mail was 7:30 a.m. His significant calls that morning between 7:50 and 9:30...

559-859-0157 Rob 7:50 12/5/2002
559-859-0157 Rob 7:52 12/5/2002
Incoming n/a 7:54 12/5/2002
Incoming n/a 7:58 12/5/2002
559-859-0157 Rob 7:59 12/5/2002
Incoming n/a 8:04 12/5/2002
559-281-8324 Amber 9:32 12/5/2002
559-281-8324 Amber 9:32 12/5/2002

ETA - What's with the code on this board, my list doesn't look like I posted it!

[Lavindar]

Like I said, nothing earth shattering in the records, at this point anyway. If one had the Cell Tower Location charts that are sealed, as well as the means to find out who owns the unlisted numbers on Scott's phone log, perhaps we could get even more CE that corroborates Scott's guilt.

Truth is though, after reviewing them, I am even more convinced that he's guilty, just by the pattern of his phone use.

Just an aside here, but Bart Corbin was unable to stay off his cell phone also, and his cell phone records convicted him.

[frydaddy]

I don't know. I was just trying to figure out which date is correct. I was going by what was posted below by CN2000 - so this info must be wrong? It also says Susan assumed it was a doctor's appt - sorry I didn't make that clear. My bad.

So Scott was in LA on the 10th?


December 5 Susan Medina notices the right rear tire on her Mercedes is dangerously low. Scott Peterson sees her circling her car and offers her a ride to an appointment. While on the way, he changes a business date by phone so he can go with Laci Peterson to an appointment, assumed by Susan Medina to be a checkup with Laci Peterson's obstetrician. Scott Peterson and Amber Frey speak by phone.

Could have been another day, that is possible. Point is, she was wrong in testimony. Makes me wonder if she was accurate about details of the burglary AND whether advocates will add her to the tar Brocchini and Kemple list?

[Lavindar]

Actually, keep in mind that the fraud records are in Eastern time, so his first call to voice mail was 7:30 a.m. His significant calls that morning between 7:50 and 9:30...

559-859-0157 Rob 7:50 12/5/2002
559-859-0157 Rob 7:52 12/5/2002
Incoming n/a 7:54 12/5/2002
Incoming n/a 7:58 12/5/2002
559-859-0157 Rob 7:59 12/5/2002
Incoming n/a 8:04 12/5/2002
559-281-8324 Amber 9:32 12/5/2002
559-281-8324 Amber 9:32 12/5/2002

ETA - What's with the code on this board, my list doesn't look like I posted it!

Refresh my memory. Who is Rob?

[TopGunner]

Could have been another day, that is possible. Point is, she was wrong in testimony. Makes me wonder if she was accurate about details of the burglary AND whether advocates will add her to the tar Brocchini and Kemple list?

WHO[SIZE="3"]A[/SIZE]!

FD, as always, excellent catch, YOU ROCK!!!

[Cadillakin]

Refresh my memory. Who is Rob?

Scott's employee