http://www.khow.com/pages/shows-capl...article=806098
You may not, and agree that you will not, reproduce, download, license, publish, enter into a database, display, modify, create derivative works from, transmit, post, distribute or perform publicly by any means, method, or process now known or later developed, decompile, reverse engineer, disassemble, use on another computer-related environment, transfer or sell any Intellectual Property, information, software or products obtained from or through this Clear Channel Website, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of Clear Channel.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 29 of 29
Thread: Mary Keenan Lacy gets served
Hybrid View
-
09-05-2006 06:26 PM #1static1 Guest
Mary Keenan Lacy gets served
-
09-05-2006 07:28 PM #2Hopeintown Guest
Thanks for posting the link static.
-
09-05-2006 07:33 PM #3I Love Books Guest
Glad to hear it. Thanks so much for the link.
-
09-05-2006 07:38 PM #4jerzeegirl Guest
honestly, im not mentally challanged or anything, could someone explain what all that means?
-
09-05-2006 07:43 PM #5static1 Guest
People in Colorado want to know the story behind JMK arrest. A local lawyer filed a public info request to see if it was ineptitude or something worse on DAs part
-
09-05-2006 07:44 PM #6msgatorslayer Guest
Thanks for posting this.
Jezeegirl, TV hosts are suing Mary Lacey, the DA who arrested John Karr, for release of all the public records pertaining to that arrest.
O/T Public service announcement for everyone to check and make sure their pm's are emptied.
-
09-05-2006 07:50 PM #7jerzeegirl Guestbut didnt she already do that with the arrest warrant, karr emails and motion to quash? Is there more?Originally posted by msgatorslayer
Thanks for posting this.
Jezeegirl, TV hosts are suing Mary Lacey, the DA who arrested John Karr, for release of all the public records pertaining to that arrest.
O/T Public service announcement for everyone to check and make sure their pm's are emptied.
-
09-05-2006 07:50 PM #8jerzeegirl Guest
and thank you both for the info, i just honestly didnt understand the article.
-
09-05-2006 07:57 PM #9static1 Guest
Many feel there is more to the story and Mary Lacy didn't really have a press conference, she only invited certain people, so the questions weren't answered. Silverman says he will have an Op-Ed piece in Rocky Mountain News soon.
-
09-05-2006 07:57 PM #10msgatorslayer GuestLots of people still feel something is 'hinky' and being hidden. I don't think that the media trusts that all of it has been released. IMOOriginally posted by jerzeegirl
but didnt she already do that with the arrest warrant, karr emails and motion to quash? Is there more?
-
09-05-2006 08:26 PM #11I Love Books Guest
Perhaps people are outraged that someone tried to "pull the wool over their eyes" with this fiasco and want to prove it was bogus from the start so to put the focus back on who they believe the real suspects are.
Just a thought.
-
09-05-2006 08:43 PM #12static1 Guest
I think Michael Tracey and Lacy are going down.
-
09-05-2006 08:45 PM #13
Super Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- top shelf
- Posts
- 3,297
Hmmm, I just knew this wasn't over yet.
moo
-
09-05-2006 10:32 PM #14
Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 192
I think the position of DA in Boulder is cursed. Someone has put a hex on it.Originally posted by static1
I think Michael Tracey and Lacy are going down.
-
09-06-2006 04:10 AM #15
Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Location
- Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Posts
- 6
i don't think Michael Tracey will go down, he has been writing a book to come out on the 10th anniversary of JBR's death. He would of been stupid to cut JMK off,imo.Originally posted by static1
I think Michael Tracey and Lacy are going down."I believe that forgiving is God's function. Our job is simply to arrange the meeting". - General Norman Schwartzkopf.
-
09-06-2006 09:03 AM #16Paisley Guest
Why would the media want to know? So they can take the information and spin it around so the truth is completely unrecognizable?
If it were the citizens of Boulder demanding answers, I'd think differently, but the media?
-
09-06-2006 09:44 AM #17
Member
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Satellite of Love
- Posts
- 67
Originally posted by I Love Books
Perhaps people are outraged that someone tried to "pull the wool over their eyes" with this fiasco and want to prove it was bogus from the start so to put the focus back on who they believe the real suspects are.
Just a thought.
Hm. Interesting thought. I tend to agree.
-
09-06-2006 11:33 AM #18day2day GuestOriginally posted by I Love Books
Perhaps people are outraged that someone tried to "pull the wool over their eyes" with this fiasco and want to prove it was bogus from the start so to put the focus back on who they believe the real suspects are.
Just a thought.
I agree!
-
09-06-2006 11:50 AM #19lisafremont Guest
If I were contemplating committing a bigtime felony, I would have to conclude that the very best place to commit it would be Boulder County where the guilty get away with murder, IMO.
-
09-06-2006 12:04 PM #20
Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 163
Trash the media all you want, but this wouldn't be the firstOriginally posted by Paisley
Why would the media want to know? So they can take the information and spin it around so the truth is completely unrecognizable?
If it were the citizens of Boulder demanding answers, I'd think differently, but the media?
time their "intrusion" has uncovered something that just
doesn't smell right. You have heard of Watergate? Woodward
and Bernstein?
Lots of people suspect that this DA, with her overly strong
ties to the Ramsey's, may be hiding more than stupidity.
Put the facts out there and let the public decide.
-
09-06-2006 12:04 PM #21I agree Paisley. If there is an ongoing investigation of Karr - I don't think the info should be released until everything is over especially like you said for the media to spin it. Guess they're upset over the fact that Lacy kept everything close to the vest as it should be.Originally posted by Paisley
Why would the media want to know? So they can take the information and spin it around so the truth is completely unrecognizable?
If it were the citizens of Boulder demanding answers, I'd think differently, but the media?
Unfortunately that is exactly why this JonBenet case is a fiasco. Because too much information was released and in addition to it not being true. JMO
-
09-06-2006 12:28 PM #22
Member
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Satellite of Love
- Posts
- 67
Originally posted by bandit's mom
Trash the media all you want, but this wouldn't be the first
time their "intrusion" has uncovered something that just
doesn't smell right. You have heard of Watergate? Woodward
and Bernstein?
Lots of people suspect that this DA, with her overly strong
ties to the Ramsey's, may be hiding more than stupidity.
Put the facts out there and let the public decide.
-
09-06-2006 01:02 PM #23Unfortunately we do need the media to do this. However, they should also be held accountable and responsible for the information they put out to the public and that is a serious issue. JMOOriginally posted by bandit's mom
Trash the media all you want, but this wouldn't be the first
time their "intrusion" has uncovered something that just
doesn't smell right. You have heard of Watergate? Woodward
and Bernstein?
Lots of people suspect that this DA, with her overly strong
ties to the Ramsey's, may be hiding more than stupidity.
Put the facts out there and let the public decide.
-
09-06-2006 02:10 PM #24Paisley GuestHeaven forbid that if Karr (or anyone else for that matter) were arrested that he be entitled to a fair trial....Originally posted by Athena
I agree Paisley. If there is an ongoing investigation of Karr - I don't think the info should be released until everything is over especially like you said for the media to spin it. Guess they're upset over the fact that Lacy kept everything close to the vest as it should be.
Unfortunately that is exactly why this JonBenet case is a fiasco. Because too much information was released and in addition to it not being true. JMO
-
09-06-2006 02:16 PM #25samsong GuestOriginally posted by bandit's mom
Trash the media all you want, but this wouldn't be the first
time their "intrusion" has uncovered something that just
doesn't smell right. You have heard of Watergate? Woodward
and Bernstein?
Lots of people suspect that this DA, with her overly strong
ties to the Ramsey's, may be hiding more than stupidity.
Put the facts out there and let the public decide.
I agree with you about the public perception of her being tainted by a perceived connection to the Ramseys. It is just one more thing that causes any information uncovered to be suspect.
My big problem is allowing Tracey, with his baggage, to be an integral part of the investigation of Karr. Karr was so tainted by his communication with Tracey that even if they could have put him in Boulder, it would have been difficult to trust the information.
-
09-06-2006 02:26 PM #26
Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Maryland
- Posts
- 136
If its released to the public, then the info would be there, regardless of how the media wanted to spin it or not spin it. the public could decide for themselves.Originally posted by Paisley
Why would the media want to know? So they can take the information and spin it around so the truth is completely unrecognizable?
If it were the citizens of Boulder demanding answers, I'd think differently, but the media?
-
09-06-2006 03:10 PM #27Bongo Guest------Maybe that is what some of the citizens of Boulder are trying to do----Accountability from Mary Lacy for holding a press conference on national TV---thanking and taking credit for this goofy fiasco----She may be a "nice lady" like NG said on TV, but truly she should have watched her P's & Q's with this---Anybody know who called that 1st press conference??----All JMOOriginally posted by Athena
Unfortunately we do need the media to do this. However, they should also be held accountable and responsible for the information they put out to the public and that is a serious issue. JMO
-
09-06-2006 05:47 PM #28Unfortunately the mass public would not go doing research as we do on this board to see what is actually "there". They rely on the media.Originally posted by trt
If its released to the public, then the info would be there, regardless of how the media wanted to spin it or not spin it. the public could decide for themselves.
As an example: I followed the MJ trial very closely. I paid for actual transcripts and it was totally incredible what was being reported by the media v what actually happened in the courtroom. I used to just shake my head at what I was hearing. jmo
-
09-06-2006 05:50 PM #29
Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 192
Kind of like Air Taser being tainted by the perceived Ramsey connection.Originally posted by samsong
I agree with you about the public perception of her being tainted by a perceived connection to the Ramseys.




Reply With Quote
