Crime Library Message Boards - View Single Post - How did the family move on after the death

Jayelles · #45 03-15-2007, 04:37 AM

Here's a summary of what the various agencies have said about the 911 tape. Also - please note that we have not heard the enhanced 911 tape - the copies which were released a few years ago were of the unenhanced version. If you do the research on forensic audio analysis you'll discover that they sometimes recommend that clients listen to the results of the enhancement on the labs equipment.

(the formatting might not copy properly)

Quote:

Let's look at what was said about the 911 tape by the variety of companies/organisations who analysed it. They were:-

FBI - at request of BPD
Secret Service - at request of BPD
Aerospace - at request of BPD
Los Alamos Scientific COmplex, New Mexico - the the request of Pete Hofstrum
Legal Audio - at request of MSNBC
Team Audio - at request of MSNBC
Some un-named company used by CBS
What these companies said:-

FBI

They were unable to lift the voices from the tape. However, it is acknowledged as a FACT that the FBI do not have the luxury of state of the art equipment. In doing my research on this fascinating subject, I made an excellent contact who informed me that the government agencies often sub-contract work to private companies for this reason. Aerospace does work free of charge for LE.

Secret Service

Ditto FBI - they were unable to lift the voices but it is known that they do not have state of the art equipment and often contract-out the work.

Aerospace

Using state of the art equipment, Aerospace enhanced the tape to reveal two more voices at the end of the tape - 1) a young voice and 2) a low male voice. Those who listened to the tape thought that the following conversation was a possibility:-

`` `Help me, Jesus, help me, Jesus.' That was clearly Patsy's voice. Then, in the distance, there was another voice, which sounded like JonBenet's brother.

Quote:

`` `Please, what do I do?'' Burke said.

`` `We're not speaking to you,' Hickman heard John Ramsey say.

``Patsy screamed again. `Help me, Jesus, help me, Jesus.'

``And then, more clearly, Burke said, `What did you find?' ''

http://www.boston.com/globe/search/s...e_schiller.htm

Aerospace made a statement to say that they stand by their work:-

Quote:

We stand by our work," Linda Brill, spokesperson for The Aerospace Corporation of El Segundo, Calif., told the Enquirer.

The company maintains a division of a Department of Justice - funded institute that offers space-age expertise to police departments nationwide.

"We are top shelf," said Brill. The NE broke the story about the 911 call in a world exclusive published in our Sept.1, 1998, edition

http://www.forumsforjustice.org/foru...e&pagenumber=1

Los Alamos Scientif Complex, New Mexico

Quote:

Pete Hofstrom would later take the 911 tape enhanced by the Aerospace Corporation to New Mexico to let his brother-in-law, who worked in the Los Alamos scientific complex, have a crack at analyzing it. The brother-in-law apparently declared that he heard a voice say, "I scream at you." That meaningless comment managed to cast doubt on the Aerospace conclusion that Burke said, "What did you find?" and was another gift to the defense lawyers. They would now be able to point out that even the
prosecutor's office and the police did not agree about what was on the tape.

Source - a post by jameson on a thread named "Opposing the BPD's request to seal 911" - March 2003.

What is important to note is that this company ALSO LIFTED VOICES - they just didn't agree on that those voices said.

Legal Audio

This company were hired by MSNBC who ran a feature on the 911 tape. Legal Audio said this:-

Interviewed in his state of the art New York City laboratory Mr. Piazza said, "I would say my findings are much more in parallel with the FBI's findings. There's not enough there to give any sort of conclusive, intelligible argument."

http://www.legalaudio.com/ontv.html

Note - he did not say there was nothing on the tape, just that they couldn't decipher it.

Team Audio

David Mariasy from Team Audio in Toledo, Ohio, agrees. “When it was suggested that we look for these other lines of dialogue and there’s two or three other people after the hang up, that didn’t happen,” he says

What a strangely worded statement. What didn't happen? Didn't they look for the dialogue? Didn't they find these other lines of dialogue? Or weren't there two or three other people? Is he referring to one, two or all three of these? His statement is ambiguous/poorly worded.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3079093/

Some un-named company hired by CBS

Originally, CBS were to have the exclusive on the 911 tape. They too had the tape independently analysed and this is what they reported:-

But journalists with CBS' 48 Hours said that program declined to air the tape because there was also a compact disc copy of the 911 call with more noises at the end that could not conclusively be analyzed.

"Our own analysis showed that there was something there. It's almost impossible to detect what it was," said Al Briganti, executive editor of 48 Hours. "It was in conflict with what Lin (Wood) felt was on the tape, so we felt we didn't really have a story."

Wood could not be reached Friday evening to respond to the CBS explanation.

(Thanks to Candy) -

http://www.cybersleuths.com/cgi-bin/...=004620#000013

PS _ the last link may not work because a lot of the cybersleuths threads were removed.