Barack's daughters

[Mother HEN]

:no:

He regrets using his two children to further his political ambitions?

He's surprised at how much attention their interviews drew?

Is this another example of his dishonesty?

Another example of his willingness to do anything to achieve his goal?

Say NO in NOvember!



http://news.google.com/nwshp?hl=en&tab=wn&ncl=1226415606&topic=el

[Mother HEN]

MEREDITH VIEIRA: Michelle, do you feel that the Reverend Wright betrayed your husband?

MICHELLE OBAMA: I think Barack has spoken so clearly and eloquently about this.

MEREDITH VIEIRA: But do you personally feel that the Reverend Wright…

MICHELLE OBAMA: You know what I think Meredith? I think we gotta move forward. You know, this conversation doesn’t help my kids. You know, it doesn’t help kids out there who are looking for us to make decisions and choices about how we’re going to better fund education.

[delsina363]

The kids were so cute in that interview. I see no harm in it.

[barskin]

:no:

He regrets using his two children to further his political ambitions?

He's surprised at how much attention their interviews drew?

Is this another example of his dishonesty?

Another example of his willingness to do anything to achieve his goal?

Say NO in NOvember!



http://news.google.com/nwshp?hl=en&tab=wn&ncl=1226415606&topic=el

Give me a break. This is what you consider a major issue??

[Mother HEN]

Give me a break. This is what you consider a major issue??

Hiya, barkskin!

Welcome to the great Barack's daughters thread!

Here, have some :chicken: and :beer: .


(If you want to discuss "a major issue", why don't you visit my Thread thread on the Embroidery forum?)

[barskin]

Hiya, barkskin!

Welcome to the great Barack's daughters thread!

Here, have some :chicken: and :beer: .


(If you want to discuss "a major issue", why don't you visit my Thread thread on the Embroidery forum?)

Hey, thanks! Embroidery? Yes, that's what I have been looking for.

[Mother HEN]

Hey, thanks! Embroidery? Yes, that's what I have been looking for.

I had a feeling it would suit you. Floss Facts and Needle Sharpening and, of course, Sexism in the History of Embroidery are three of my favorite topics.

You'll be the life of the party. (The posters over there are a little staid.)

[franker01]

[QUOTE=Mother HEN;9107718]:no:

He regrets using his two children to further his political ambitions?

He's surprised at how much attention their interviews drew?

Is this another example of his dishonesty?

Another example of his willingness to do anything to achieve his goal?
<snip>

[QUOTE]

They're very cute as almost all young girls are.

JFK kind of put his kids out there, too, but not nearly to this extent.

I'd agree with him that it was a mistake to do so.

Politicians do what they do, afterall. :)

[franker01]

Got to get this "Quote" thing down.

IS went down and all my posting skills seem to have gone with it. :)

[Ring-o-Saturn]

:no:

He regrets using his two children to further his political ambitions?

He's surprised at how much attention their interviews drew?

Is this another example of his dishonesty?

Another example of his willingness to do anything to achieve his goal?

Say NO in NOvember!



http://news.google.com/nwshp?hl=en&tab=wn&ncl=1226415606&topic=el

So you prefer John McCain who's voted consistently against health and wellness programs for women and children & who accepts campaign cash from the FLDS while refusing to state where he stands on polygamy and refuses to address complaints from his constituents in AZ regarding the rape and forced marriages of under aged girls in FLDS camps located in AZ?

Because of course allowing an interview with his beautiful family is such a malicious damaging thing, so much worse than the list above?

Have I got that right?

[Mother HEN]

Typical ringo post.




(The nasty tattletale seems to regard John as the only alternative to Barack.)



(S/he forgot to mention John's greatest attribute: he's not Barack.)


Barack has forgotten all about the interview with his daughters, now that he is OUTRAGED by the New Yorker cover.

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=new%20yorker%20cover%20barack&um=1&sa=N&tab=wn


NO ONE has a right to make fun of Michelle/Barack. NO ONE has a right to portray him in a turban. NO ONE has a right to suggest that he's a Muslim.

That's a SMEAR, according to his SMEAR site.

(Will Muslims vote for Barack/Michelle?)

[crocdog]

[QUOTE=Mother HEN;9107718]:no:

He regrets using his two children to further his political ambitions?

He's surprised at how much attention their interviews drew?

Is this another example of his dishonesty?

Another example of his willingness to do anything to achieve his goal?

Say NO in NOvember!
http://news.google.com/nwshp?hl=en&tab=wn&ncl=1226415606&topic=el[/QUOTE

There are far more important things to discuss.

For instance is drilling for oil exploitation, or exploration?

JM's speech left me confused on this issue.

Also, if Viagra is approved for medical insurance, how come birth-control is not?

"Vote NO in NOvember" if you are happy with the way our EXPERIENCED leaders are rui,,,,opps, I mean running our country.:biggrin:

JMHO

[Ring-o-Saturn]

Typical ringo post.




(The nasty tattletale seems to regard John as the only alternative to Barack.)



(S/he forgot to mention John's greatest attribute: he's not Barack.)


Barack has forgotten all about the interview with his daughters, now that he is OUTRAGED by the New Yorker cover.

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=new%20yorker%20cover%20barack&um=1&sa=N&tab=wn


NO ONE has a right to make fun of Michelle/Barack. NO ONE has a right to portray him in a turban. NO ONE has a right to suggest that he's a Muslim.

That's a SMEAR, according to his SMEAR site.

(Will Muslims vote for Barack/Michelle?)

Tattle tail? Is that what it is when you clearly state the facts? Is McCain's record of voting supposed to be a secret?

BTW, I asked a question, do you prefer McCain? He's the only other candidate put forth by a major party, did you not realize that?

Please do tell us all about that third party candidate of your choosing if you like. You know, the one that must have some chance of prevailing in the GE, otherwise there's no sense in discussing them now, is there?

I'd really like to hear someone put something positive forward, but I'll not be sitting back watching anyone condemn one candidate (Obama) for a touching family portrait he may think better of in hindsight when the alternative (McCain) in action has shown total disregard for all women and children and doesn't seem to have any regret in doing so.

Heaven forbid we allow prenatal care for poor woman, but let's not pay for contraception or even educate poor women on that matter, it's AOK for those insurance companies to pay for viagra but no need to them to pay for contraception to prevent that pregnancy per John McCain's voting record. Once that child is born we'll not be paying for any early childhood wellness such as vaccinations or nutrition programs either per John McCain's record of voting.

Tattle tail? Is that the smear of the day when a Republican candidate doesn't want to deal with the realities of his own voting record, lack of action in his home state regarding constituent concerns and loose ethics when accepting campaign cash?

Please do step forward with that case that makes a bit of sense, but criticism over a television interview in light of the legislative action taken by the opponent over time just doesn't hold water. Sorry for busting your bubble but never for bringing forth the truth.:patriot:

[Mother HEN]

Tattle tail? :

(Should be tattletale.)


(Your post is too long and turgid and off topic. This thread is about Michelle's daughters, not about John.)



(You are nasty.)


:punch:

[Mother HEN]

Why did Barack and Michelle scrub their website?

:no:

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/07/obama-surge.html

[Mother HEN]

:no:

Why are Michelle and her husband and daughters afraid to meet military families?

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=27533

[Mother HEN]

http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2008/06/13/aol-straw-poll-june-13-20/


McCain 70%

Obama 30%

[trt]

Why did Barack and Michelle scrub their website?

:no:

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/07/obama-surge.html

LOL, did you forget what you posted in the post just above this one? Here it is again for you in case you missed it

"This thread is about Michelle's daughters..."

[crocdog]

Why did Barack and Michelle scrub their website?

:no:

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/07/obama-surge.html

Isn't this way "off topic?"

I was under the impression the topic was about Barack and Michelle's daughters?:shrug:

[Mother HEN]

LOL, did you forget what you posted in the post just above this one? Here it is again for you in case you missed it

"This thread is about Michelle's daughters..."


JA?

And how do you know the part they scrubbed was NOT about their daughters?

Anyway, Barack/Michelle have forgotten daughtergate, now that they're busy being outraged by The New Yorker.

Funny how the talkers are using the same self-congratulatory disclaimers they used when Hillary threatened Barack by mentioning a historical fact. THEY, understood what she meant, and THEY know the Clintons are not racists (even though they use "racially charged" and "insensitive" language and constantly "play the race card"). But the problem is . . . , those OTHER people (black or white, bitter and stooopied, NOT sophisticated like they are, not familiar with the long and rich history of political cartooning, etc.) might misunderstand.

E.g., Clarence Page, Michelle Bernard, Jonathan Capehart, Bob Herbert, Gene Robinson, etc.

The swooners/droolers/cultists/worshippers reflect their Leader's disdain/contempt for those outside the Flock.

And the flap has unleashed a new wave of Muslim bashing. Notice that? Oooh, how DARE anyone SMEAR Barack by mentioning the word Mooooose-leem (as Chris Matthews now pronounces it).

Will Muslims vote for Barack/Michelle?


ڰڵڿټٸڱ

[Mother HEN]

Isn't this way "off topic?"

I was under the impression the topic was about Barack and Michelle's daughters?:shrug:

You were under that impression? Then you DELIBERATELY attempted to derail the thread with your off-topic (and offensive) post about rape.

Take that! :punch:


Typical of Barack's wooly-headed followers to try to suppress ANY criticism of their Bellwether.

[Mother HEN]

Barack is a BAMBOOZLER.

http://voices.kansascity.com/node/1610

Barack lied:

I think that we got carried away in the moment," Obama told NBC. "We were having a birthday party and everybody was laughing, and suddenly this thing cropped up, and I didn't catch it quickly enough and I was surprised by the attention it got."

Riiight. A bunch of people with cameras and lighting equipment and microphones just "cropped up".

[trt]

Isn't this way "off topic?"

I was under the impression the topic was about Barack and Michelle's daughters?:shrug:


Hiya crocdog...This "Mother Hen" has the right to do as she pleases as long as it berates the Obama family, but will wax all "Poetic" on you if you dare bring logic into the conversation. The obsession with the Obamas is obvious no matter which nick or which board we are on. Sad, really.

[trt]

JA?

And how do you know the part they scrubbed was NOT about their daughters?

Anyway, Barack/Michelle have forgotten daughtergate, now that they're busy being outraged by The New Yorker.

Funny how the talkers are using the same self-congratulatory disclaimers they used when Hillary threatened Barack by mentioning a historical fact. THEY, understood what she meant, and THEY know the Clintons are not racists (even though they use "racially charged" and "insensitive" language and constantly "play the race card"). But the problem is . . . , those OTHER people (black or white, bitter and stooopied, NOT sophisticated like they are, not familiar with the long and rich history of political cartooning, etc.) might misunderstand.

E.g., Clarence Page, Michelle Bernard, Jonathan Capehart, Bob Herbert, Gene Robinson, etc.

The swooners/droolers/cultists/worshippers reflect their Leader's disdain/contempt for those outside the Flock.

And the flap has unleashed a new wave of Muslim bashing. Notice that? Oooh, how DARE anyone SMEAR Barack by mentioning the word Mooooose-leem (as Chris Matthews now pronounces it).

Will Muslims vote for Barack/Michelle?


ڰڵڿټٸڱ



ORIGINALLY POSTED BY MOTHER HEN

"Your post is too long and turgid and off topic. This thread is about Michelle's daughters...."

[crocdog]

You were under that impression? Then you DELIBERATELY attempted to derail the thread with your off-topic (and offensive) post about rape.

Take that! :punch:


Typical of Barack's wooly-headed followers to try to suppress ANY criticism of their Bellwether.

I would like to know exactly what you are talking about?

Where did I post anything in this thread about "rape?"

Please let me know?

Thank you,

Crocdog

[Mother HEN]

Hiya crocdog...This "Mother Hen" has the right to do as she pleases as long as it berates the Obama family, but will wax all "Poetic" on you if you dare bring logic into the conversation. The obsession with the Obamas is obvious no matter which nick or which board we are on. Sad, really.


You're the one with the "obsession with the Obamas". If you're not interested in them, why are you in this thread?

(Whining about another poster's "nick" is juvenile. Go :punch: yourself.)

[trt]

You're the one with the "obsession with the Obamas". If you're not interested in them, why are you in this thread?

(Whining about another poster's "nick" is juvenile. Go :punch: yourself.)


Sure, I'm obsessed with them...I love them. I think they are classy, wonderful examples for all Americans to follow. I'm voting for him. You aren't, you are still bitter that he beat out Hill and you have been on an obsessed mission ever since. At least I can admit it.

Where did I whine? Just letting you know that no matter which nick you assume, your ridiculous postings will surely *tell* on you. I have no stake in which nick you choose to use to try and disparage the Obamas...just pointing out something that is interesting(and all too transparent) to me.

[Mother HEN]

I would like to know exactly what you are talking about?

Where did I post anything in this thread about "rape?"

Please let me know?

Thank you,

Crocdog

Maybe that was the other Barack follower who said something about John and rape. (I speed-scrolled by, since it was long and turgid and off-topic.) I think you both wanted to discuss viagra?

(Start your own thread in which to :punch: John.)

[Mother HEN]

Sure, I'm obsessed with them...I love them. I think they are classy, wonderful examples for all Americans to follow. I'm voting for him. You aren't, you are still bitter that he beat out Hill and you have been on an obsessed mission ever since. At least I can admit it.

Where did I whine? Just letting you know that no matter which nick you assume, your ridiculous postings will surely *tell* on you. I have no stake in which nick you choose to use to try and disparage the Obamas...just pointing out something that is interesting(and all too transparent) to me.


Your obsession with ME is creeeepy.



You're mad because I know how clueless you are. (Remember when you said class conflict is a recent development in human development?)

:sneer:

[trt]

Your obsession with ME is creeeepy.



You're mad because I know how clueless you are. (Remember when you said class conflict is a recent development in human development?)

:sneer:


I'm not mad at you...I do find you quite intriguing. Your obsession and incessant babbling about Barack and Michelle is quite amusing to watch. It's amusing because you know that Barack is the better choice, but can't let your bitterness at being beat out go. So you take it out on Barack and Michelle, no matter how ridiculous the topic, stretch or twist.

LOL, I asked you to show where I said that before and you couldn't. You are STILL bringing that up? But *I'm* obsessed? LOL...like I said, you are amusing and that's why I tolerate you.

[Mother HEN]

I'm not mad at you...I do find you quite intriguing. Your obsession and incessant babbling about Barack and Michelle is quite amusing to watch. It's amusing because you know that Barack is the better choice, but can't let your bitterness at being beat out go. So you take it out on Barack and Michelle, no matter how ridiculous the topic, stretch or twist.

LOL, I asked you to show where I said that before and you couldn't. You are STILL bringing that up? But *I'm* obsessed? LOL...like I said, you are amusing and that's why I tolerate you.

I'm not interested in searching your old posts. As you know, I speedscroll past most of them.


But you said it, of course. I was not familiar with you and your difficulties yet, so I offered a google link to get you started. You replied by saying not all of the millions of leads to class conflict in human history were useful: one was about the time of P. E. class at a school

:sneer:

That's when I realized you were a bamboozler, like Barack.


As to Barack being the better choice? No. A liar is never a good choice for anything.

[Mother HEN]

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&um=1&tab=wn&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=barack%27s+daughters&btnG=Search+News

Google News: "barack's daughters".


Third one down, "What's Up With Barack", is interesting, imho.

[trt]

I'm not interested in searching your old posts. As you know, I speedscroll past most of them.


But you said it, of course. I was not familiar with you and your difficulties yet, so I offered a google link to get you started. You replied by saying not all of the millions of leads to class conflict in human history were useful: one was about the time of P. E. class at a school

:sneer:

That's when I realized you were a bamboozler, like Barack.


As to Barack being the better choice? No. A liar is never a good choice for anything.


Riiight...of course I said exactly what you said I did(and it's not just an example of one of your many instances of being unable to comprehend logic and therefore inserting your own twisted and irrelevant *logic*) and refuse to offer up any proof under the guise that you only speed-scroll past my posts(how do you know what I say, then? sort of like the time *you* put me on ignore and then still proceeded to respond to my posts, lol. But I'm obsessed?).


You were voting for Hillary (until she lost, hence your bitterness and *flip/flop* on being a yellow dog democrat) and now say that a liar is never a good choice for anything? Like I said...amusing.

[Mother HEN]

Riiight...of course I said exactly what you said I did(and it's not just an example of one of your many instances of being unable to comprehend logic and therefore inserting your own twisted and irrelevant *logic*) and refuse to offer up any proof under the guise that you only speed-scroll past my posts(how do you know what I say, then? sort of like the time *you* put me on ignore and then still proceeded to respond to my posts, lol. But I'm obsessed?).


You were voting for Hillary (until she lost, hence your bitterness and *flip/flop* on being a yellow dog democrat) and now say that a liar is never a good choice for anything? Like I said...amusing.


True, I won't be supporting the Democratic candidate for the first time in my long life.

Many reasons, and since you devour my posts, you know them all.



(Why do you prate about "logic" so much? You are as clueless about logic as you are about history. Your besetting fallacy? Argumentum ad verecundiam.)

[trt]

True, I won't be supporting the Democratic candidate for the first time in my long life.

Many reasons, and since you devour my posts, you know them all.



(Why do you prate about "logic" so much? You are as clueless about logic as you are about history. Your besetting fallacy? Argumentum ad verecundiam.)


How do you know what I *prate* about? You speed-scroll past my posts and have even resorted to *placing me on ignore* so you don't have to read them. I've been posting on the Court TV board for years and you are the first person to suggest that I am *clueless* about anything. But it's cool...I get it. Bitterness has its way of clouding your judgement. Keep 'em coming...I have to have something to amuse me during a long day at work.

[Mother HEN]

I have to have something to amuse me during a long day at work.






Bamboozling the boss?

[trt]

Bamboozling the boss?


Not at all, but thanks for taking this past just an obsession with what and how I post and all the way into my personal life and what is or isn't acceptable at my work place.

[franker01]

When worlds collide! :)

But scurrying back to the topic, my guess is that the interview was a little less spontaneous than Obama indicates and, because it was not received well by some, that he honestly regrets having done it. If it had gone well I suspect that he would have been fine with it.

Personally I don't read a whole lot more into it than that.

[Mother HEN]

When worlds collide! :)

But scurrying back to the topic, my guess is that the interview was a little less spontaneous than Obama indicates and, because it was not received well by some, that he honestly regrets having done it. If it had gone well I suspect that he would have been fine with it.

Personally I don't read a whole lot more into it than that.


He didn't get where he is by not being calculating. I think he hoped for a surge from the display of his children, and it hasn't happened.

"Poll Finds Obama Still Faces Racial Gap"

http://news.aol.com/elections/story/_a/poll-finds-obama-still-faces-racial-gap/20080716092109990001

[Ring-o-Saturn]

(You are nasty.)




Right back at ya goose: :punch:

Now that we're clear that your only intent is ad hominem attack as opposed to actual discussion of the campaign or the candidates, there would be no need to waste another moment of precious time on you.

Opinions are like anatomy parts, everyone has one & true to form yours reeks, but have at it now that we're all aware it's got no basis in reality to the point you can't defend your own position.

[Mother HEN]

http://www.thestamfordtimes.com/stamford_templates/stamford_story/363686370100438.php


The topper came last week, however, with the appearance of Barack and Michelle and the two daughters, Malia and Sasha, on "Access Hollywood" aka "Excess Hollywood."

The girls were miked up and were precocious and their parents smiled during this filming of one of the girl's birthday party. When Barack's handlers saw the tape on TV and started getting the complaints from supporters, they realized he had made a major goof.

Suddenly, he issues a statement the girls are off- limits and there would be no such future tapings.

You might remember that it was NBC's David Shuster who disgustingly accused Hillary Clinton of "pimping" her daughter Chelsea, campaigning for her mother. Would we expect to hear Shuster accuse Barack and Michelle of "pimping" their young daughters? I think not.






Nasty David Shuster, a typical Barack follower.


:no:

[Mother HEN]

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=malia+obama&btnG=Google+Search

[Mother HEN]

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=sasha+obama&btnG=Search

[Mother HEN]

AOL's poll has been consistent for weeks, showing Barack waaaay behind John.


John: 68% KKKKKKK

Barack: 32% LLL

[Mother HEN]

http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2008/06/13/aol-straw-poll-june-13-20/