PDA

View Full Version : Michael Jackson: Child Molester or Misunderstood?


Levi
11-24-2006, 02:36 PM
IMO Michael Jacksons fits the profile of a pedophile to a perfect "T." He seduced the parents. He had well-developed techniques gaining access to children. He seduced his children victims. He had the ability to identify with & listen to children. He collected keepsakes from his victims. He has the classic symptoms of a pedophile which is refusing to say his behavior is wrong. In his mind sleeping with children that are not his own is fine. He has victimized multiple children. Using his celebrity to lure children into Neverland. Giving them alcohol. Taking them on rides. Showing them pornography. He was gaining their trust. I cannot see how anyone can possibly say that he was innocent of all the allegations against him after analyzing his behavior.

Hey Paula
12-04-2006, 02:58 PM
Despite the jury's verdict, MJ is a serial pedophile. That's why he moved to Bahrain, as he knew he would not be able to resist his urges and compulsion to molest children again. I've read reports that pedophilia is committed openly on the streets of Bahrain.

IMO

Levi
12-15-2006, 09:26 PM
Despite the jury's verdict, MJ is a serial pedophile. That's why he moved to Bahrain, as he knew he would not be able to resist his urges and compulsion to molest children again. I've read reports that pedophilia is committed openly on the streets of Bahrain.

IMO
I totally agree. Jackson is a serial pedophile & I think he will never stop molesting as long as he is alive. Unfortunately we had a bunch of idiots on his jury, who let this pedophile walk free & molest again. It is a disgrace. Atleast for the time being American children are free of his molestation. Just wish he was locked up right now. And would realize that sleeping with little boys isn't normal unless you are a member of ****** & that most Americans think it is a disgusting act that only a scumbag freak would do, or accept.

AmyW
12-19-2006, 11:22 PM
Written by Marcus Lamar Walker
June 25, 2006
ask.yahoo.com

Regardless of how we feel about it, Michael Jackson is innocent. Flip the script. (The following example is hypothetical, please don't take it seriously... it's just that... an example.)

For example, you're at school and James has a pen and is using the pen. When James isn't looking, the pen falls on the ground. James looks back, and the pen is gone. James says that you took the pen. James looks behind him and asks Laurie did you take the pen. Laurie says yes because she doesn't like you. But the pen fell on the floor!!

This was just an example, but use it in Michael Jackson's scenario. The facts of the most recent case.

-Gavin spent several months at Neverland with Michael, his sister, his brother, and his own mother!
-They did spend in the night in Michael's room (as most of the kids that stayed at Neverland)
- There is NO proof that Michael gave alcohol to the minors (no eye-witnesses). The witnesses that they had in the case were not creditable.
- There is NO proof that Michael molested that child. Remember the DNA evidence they took in December, 2004? Remember the matching fingerprints on the magazines? Remember the internet cache of the porn sites? NONE of this was creditable and linked Michael Jackson either molesting this child or doing anything improper with this child.

SO HOW can you convict a person based on the evidence at hand. Use the example of James and the pen. He accused you of doing something improper without having the necessary evidence to prosecute!

Making an argument that he is guilty because he is weird, strange, and what 47 year-old-man likes to play with children other than a pedophile. Michael Jackson, by the evidence, is neither a pedophile nor homosexual. Please people, look at the evidence before you convict someone of anything improper.

Below is a hyperlink to the detailed facts of the case: Michael Jackson v. People of California

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Jackson_case

katta
12-20-2006, 04:13 AM
Despite the jury's verdict, MJ is a serial pedophile. That's why he moved to Bahrain, as he knew he would not be able to resist his urges and compulsion to molest children again. I've read reports that pedophilia is committed openly on the streets of Bahrain.

IMO

I did not know he moved to Bahrain?? Are you sure you aren't thinking of Thailand?

Levi
12-24-2006, 11:30 PM
I did not know he moved to Bahrain?? Are you sure you aren't thinking of Thailand?
No. It is Baharain. He is a guest of the Prince. Don't you remember when Michael Jackson dressed up like a woman, wore the women gowns that they wear in Bahrain & he was caught by another woman in the woman's bathroom putting on makeup! ROFLMAO! His crew of women, tackled a woman who took pictures of it on her cellphone & took her cell phone from her! Charges were NOT filed against his crew of women. So that leads me to the conclusion that if he molested children in Bahrain, NO action would be taken.

Levi
12-24-2006, 11:38 PM
Now he is working on another album in Bahrain: http://www.nme.com/news/michael-jackson/22826

AmyW
12-25-2006, 04:54 AM
Here's a link about him dressed like a woman in Baharain.

http://sabbah.biz/mt/archives/2006/01/25/michael-jackson-shops-in-bahrain-disguised-as-woman/

wind149
12-29-2006, 12:33 PM
Geez, he did his homework, where he could have access to little boys. a poor uneducated country where for the price of a goat the child's families will **** them out to that low-life, and because he is the great Michael Jackson they feel honored that MJ would pick their son. and the reason I say this is the parents of both boys were poor, uneducated, and with all his wealth they just saw that he could give them what they could not, toys, trips, Netherland, and I do believe the first child's mother knew what was going on and decided to come forward and jump on the gravy train and earned her 20 million dollar payoff. The second kid's mother wanted MJ charged but I am sure she thought down the road that he could be charged in civil court afterward and get herself a nice chunk of change. MJ's lawyers' were smart they put the mother on trial instead of the pervert and that is the only reason he walked is at the time the jury saw her as a gold digger and therefore was not really credible and out the door free as a bird a dangerous, low-life, POS pedophile. I am pleased to see that he is pretty much broke, no one wants to record an album with him, he was supposed to record a record with other artists for Katrina victims, see it on the shelves anywhere? No, he is pretty much a pariah in Hollyweird, the stars, even Elizabeth Taylor wants nothing to do with him because they see for themselves that even though he was found not guilty that does not mean that he is innocent either. Anyone really think OJ is innocent? Will MJ re-offend? I guarantee he already has with some scared little boy and with the parent's blessings, after all we need to eat. He should have no contact with his children either, they will grow up warped like him and regardless of what he tells people they are not his biological children as much as he tries to come off as white he has black genes and they will dominate and those children are not bi-racial. As a final thought that makes me sick when I look at him is by not finding him guilty the powers that be have empowered him, because he now thinks ,wow I can really get away with this because I am the King of Pop.

Levi
12-29-2006, 02:33 PM
Geez, he did his homework, where he could have access to little boys. a poor uneducated country where for the price of a goat the child's families will **** them out to that low-life, and because he is the great Michael Jackson they feel honored that MJ would pick their son. and the reason I say this is the parents of both boys were poor, uneducated, and with all his wealth they just saw that he could give them what they could not, toys, trips, Netherland, and I do believe the first child's mother knew what was going on and decided to come forward and jump on the gravy train and earned her 20 million dollar payoff. The second kid's mother wanted MJ charged but I am sure she thought down the road that he could be charged in civil court afterward and get herself a nice chunk of change. MJ's lawyers' were smart they put the mother on trial instead of the pervert and that is the only reason he walked is at the time the jury saw her as a gold digger and therefore was not really credible and out the door free as a bird a dangerous, low-life, POS pedophile. I am pleased to see that he is pretty much broke, no one wants to record an album with him, he was supposed to record a record with other artists for Katrina victims, see it on the shelves anywhere? No, he is pretty much a pariah in Hollyweird, the stars, even Elizabeth Taylor wants nothing to do with him because they see for themselves that even though he was found not guilty that does not mean that he is innocent either. Anyone really think OJ is innocent? Will MJ re-offend? I guarantee he already has with some scared little boy and with the parent's blessings, after all we need to eat. He should have no contact with his children either, they will grow up warped like him and regardless of what he tells people they are not his biological children as much as he tries to come off as white he has black genes and they will dominate and those children are not bi-racial. As a final thought that makes me sick when I look at him is by not finding him guilty the powers that be have empowered him, because he now thinks ,wow I can really get away with this because I am the King of Pop.
great post!
anyone that followed the criminal trial should come to the same conclusion you have. he is a serial pedophile. i hope he goes to jail one day, where he belongs!

Chocoholic
12-30-2006, 11:53 AM
Despite the jury's verdict, MJ is a serial pedophile. That's why he moved to Bahrain, as he knew he would not be able to resist his urges and compulsion to molest children again. I've read reports that pedophilia is committed openly on the streets of Bahrain.

IMO

Pedophelia is not against the law in Bahrain. Gay sex is. I don't know how they would deal with MJ's uhm "issues".

Levi
01-01-2007, 12:24 AM
He is back here in the U.S. He was @ James Brown's funeral. God we can't get rid of him!

Kor
01-09-2007, 03:34 AM
Curious, why does MJ use masks or something to hide his kids’ faces from everybody? Did both kids also receive plastic surgeries or skin grafting like their dad? It unhealthy life for these 2 kids, not just because they have to hide their faces or themselves from the public, but just because MJ is their dad…which means, either MJ is ashamed of his own kids, or otherwise normal parents don’t hide their own children or their faces except for pedophiles, I bet. Sad to see these 2 kids being on MJ’s leash and I wonder when his kids will be free of MJ which means MJ’s secretive relationship of some kind with them may no longer be concealed too. I don’t care if MJ wants to hide his face or himself, but isn’t that what pedophiles usually do after they are exposed?

Auntie Venom
01-21-2007, 12:48 AM
I am afraid that Michael Jackson will continue to abuse children until someone credible comes foward to stop him. He has chosen his victims very well thus far, but I wonder what tales his own children will be able to tell some day...I think that he hides their faces to hide the fact that there's no way they could be his. They're white, completely white. With blonde hair! Come on....

nature's star
01-21-2007, 06:35 PM
Anyone who followed the trial like I think Levi did would know that everything he posted about the alcohol and porn was proven to be untrue. Jackson has been around countless numbers of children since the 80's and if he was a serial pedophile, the victims that exist in peoples' imaginations would have come forward when the DA put out a casting call complete with toll-free number for them to come forward. I don't think he's ever molested any child and I base that on the evidence.

Chocoholic
02-13-2007, 08:56 PM
Anyone who followed the trial like I think Levi did would know that everything he posted about the alcohol and porn was proven to be untrue. Jackson has been around countless numbers of children since the 80's and if he was a serial pedophile, the victims that exist in peoples' imaginations would have come forward when the DA put out a casting call complete with toll-free number for them to come forward. I don't think he's ever molested any child and I base that on the evidence.

1. It was not proven that the acohol and porn was proven to be untrue. The jury found there was no proof beyond a reasonable doubt in the latest sexual assault case, and even two jurors later on stated they believe MJ is a pedophile. Please look up reasonable doubt.

2. MJ paid off at least one victim, where are the others we don't know about?

I base my opinion on what evidence IS available and he is most certainly a raging pedophile.

Tom Mahon
06-29-2009, 08:25 AM
To decide whether Michael Jackson was guilty of child molestation, you need to:
1. Look at the prosecution's theory.
2. Look at the defense's theory.
3. Predict what the facts would be if the prosecution's theory were true.
4. Predict what the facts would be if the defense's theory were true.
5. Look at the actual facts.
6. Compare the facts to what you would expect if either theory were true.
I went through that exercise back when Jackson's trial was going on. I posted my results on my web site:
http://mahonblog.com/archives/9

A more thorough examination of the evidence is in:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Jackson_case

A very interesting point is that psychologist Dr. Stanley Katz said that Jackson didn't fit the profile of a pedophile; instead he was a regressed ten year old. This is important because Dr. Katz was retained by Larry Feldman, the lawyer for Jordy Chandler and Gavin Arvizo, the two accusers of Jackson.

MJlover4ever
07-11-2009, 04:36 PM
Now, what...???
Is there anything you'd like to say about his case, now???
Ha... This is so repulsing... Michael couldn't be guilty of any of these insanities... Not logical... How could a man who was always composing songs about love, healing and changing the world, peace, love, love and more love... - how could the father (a GREAT father, probably one of the best fathers ever 'cuz he made it obvious, and his daughter confrimed it on his very sad funeral...) of three children could be responsible of such disgusting acts?
He was innocent... Always knew... What, do you think that now, that he died and nothing would make any sense at all, the Jacksons blackmailed the supposed "victim" to say publicaly NOW, that Michael Jackson "never put a finger on me"...? WTF!?
Ha... Jesus... May the Lord forgive you all for judging him so bad, and recieve him in Heaven for being the incredibly good person he was when he was still on Earth...

A very loyal fan...

One2Snoop
07-12-2009, 01:50 AM
Now, what...???
Is there anything you'd like to say about his case, now???
Ha... This is so repulsing... Michael couldn't be guilty of any of these insanities... Not logical... How could a man who was always composing songs about love, healing and changing the world, peace, love, love and more love... - how could the father (a GREAT father, probably one of the best fathers ever 'cuz he made it obvious, and his daughter confrimed it on his very sad funeral...) of three children could be responsible of such disgusting acts?
He was innocent... Always knew... What, do you think that now, that he died and nothing would make any sense at all, the Jacksons blackmailed the supposed "victim" to say publicaly NOW, that Michael Jackson "never put a finger on me"...? WTF!?
Ha... Jesus... May the Lord forgive you all for judging him so bad, and recieve him in Heaven for being the incredibly good person he was when he was still on Earth...

A very loyal fan...

I'm sorry you've chosen to bump a very old thread to express your opinions about MJ - IMO - this wasn't the right thread to bump.

MJ had issues no doubt, but that comes with money and fame unfortunately.

He was a legend and I still to this day don't believe he's a pervert - just a very misunderstood "person" and whoever chose to take advantage, did.

I feel sad for MJ - and my only wish and prayer is that his children are never exposed to the exploits of Joe Jackson. He's the perferct example of Evil. IMO JMO.

grneyes
07-12-2009, 11:24 PM
I've always been torn about whether or not he was guilty. I hope that someone that did so much good in the world and had such amazing talent, truly was innocent. And if he wasn't, then he can do no more harm.

wind149
07-13-2009, 04:00 PM
It has been said that you can't speak ill of the dead, but in his case I make an exception. I do think he touched boys inappropriately because it has been also reported his evil father sexually abused him and I truly believe that, because MJ did not leave him one dime and I can only guess it is because he hated his father and I can relate because I hate my adoptive mother. Also, he never spent any time with women his own age, unless you count that sham of a marriage to Lisa Marie, which to me was damage control, because here again, no one ever saw him with women and this occurred right after the first allegations arose and I did think at that time, that he was a victim of extortion because the mother of that child, took a $20 million dollar shut up check, but in 2003, when he is formally charged with many counts of molestation, what is a person to think?

And he very publicly announced to the world that he saw nothing wrong with having little boys sleep in his bed with him? Notice he never said little girls??? He also says that by having the boys sleep with him, it is the ultimate expression of love? I could it perversion from where I sit! Here is a an adult male having sleepovers with little boys that are not relatives? I would never allow my god son now to sleep in my bed, he just turned 14 and like he can sleep on the couch??? When he was little yeah, but not when he is halfway to being an adult!!! SO as far as I am concerned, I do believe that he did what he was accused of and had he not said he saw nothing wrong with it, I probably would have thought once again, somebody is trying to extort money and in the trial, that boy was pretty adamant what had transpired, like MJ gave them alcohol and called it of all things, "JESUS JUICE"????

They watched porno flicks??? Now if this wasn't seduction, I don't know what is??? A grown man, having sleepovers with boys not even in their teens, plying them with booze and showing them porn and some of you think he is just a misunderstood creature and that he is a not a child molester???? He brought it all on himself and I was appalled that he beat those charges and later on to learn from some of the jury, that 4 months later, they now think they made a mistake?? You are damm right they did, but he will never touch a child again and it appears that he died from drugs, but he had help there.

Seashell
07-19-2009, 12:46 PM
It has been said that you can't speak ill of the dead, but in his case I make an exception. I do think he touched boys inappropriately because it has been also reported his evil father sexually abused him and I truly believe that, because MJ did not leave him one dime and I can only guess it is because he hated his father and I can relate because I hate my adoptive mother. Also, he never spent any time with women his own age, unless you count that sham of a marriage to Lisa Marie, which to me was damage control, because here again, no one ever saw him with women and this occurred right after the first allegations arose and I did think at that time, that he was a victim of extortion because the mother of that child, took a $20 million dollar shut up check, but in 2003, when he is formally charged with many counts of molestation, what is a person to think?

And he very publicly announced to the world that he saw nothing wrong with having little boys sleep in his bed with him? Notice he never said little girls??? He also says that by having the boys sleep with him, it is the ultimate expression of love? I could it perversion from where I sit! Here is a an adult male having sleepovers with little boys that are not relatives? I would never allow my god son now to sleep in my bed, he just turned 14 and like he can sleep on the couch??? When he was little yeah, but not when he is halfway to being an adult!!! SO as far as I am concerned, I do believe that he did what he was accused of and had he not said he saw nothing wrong with it, I probably would have thought once again, somebody is trying to extort money and in the trial, that boy was pretty adamant what had transpired, like MJ gave them alcohol and called it of all things, "JESUS JUICE"????

They watched porno flicks??? Now if this wasn't seduction, I don't know what is??? A grown man, having sleepovers with boys not even in their teens, plying them with booze and showing them porn and some of you think he is just a misunderstood creature and that he is a not a child molester???? He brought it all on himself and I was appalled that he beat those charges and later on to learn from some of the jury, that 4 months later, they now think they made a mistake?? You are damm right they did, but he will never touch a child again and it appears that he died from drugs, but he had help there.

Excellent post and well put, i also have written in similar mode on another site and was attacked left right and centre for having my opnion on MJ, his supporters used the excuse of the fact he didnt have a normal childhood and a whole lot of other nonsense, you do not sleep with kids when and adult and you certainly do not have sleep over with locked bedrooms and give dtrict orders to not be disturbed, he was a sicko and only his victims with time can come foward and admit what he did, time will tell and time has its true answers.

wind149
07-19-2009, 07:05 PM
Sea, Let me guess In Sessions where the clique rules?? Those snobs over there I could give one crap what they think of me and I am the honest one! They also allow baiters and ped lovers and serial killer groupies which we ban when we know there is one trying to run their spin here. They banned me because I wrote in graphic detail what I would do to Couey if I could get my hands on him and he would be begging me to kill him and this is what he deserves instead of just getting a needle that puts his lights out and he never feels the others paralyze him or stops his heart. So if it was those morons on Sessions, forget them and join for good here, we all have a good time here and you are not personally attacked if you don't happen to agree, we agree to disagree. I remember when the Haleigh Cummings board was started and I called that whole hillbilly trash as that and people got upset because I called them hillbilly's and people here have kin in the south and I was able to convey to them that I did not mean their relatives, but the Scumming family and all their kin and that child is dead because of their low life lifestyle. Other than that, I have never had any problems here with folks. They know by now that I will be speaking my mind and honestly and that is the way one should be. As for MJ, he was a pedophile and a drug addict and no matter how much his delusional family tries to deny it and are trying to run the spin that he was murdered which is crap, keeping him alive meant all his hanger-ons and his many Dr. Feelgoods were making money, why kill the cash cow for a measly $50 million when you keep him alive and happy, and get millions more?


Them doctors have made a ton of money and I hope losing their license was worth keeping this pedophile junkie happy because not only will they be probably going to jail, any fortune they have amassed, is gonna go to their fat cat lawyers and they are gonna bleed them dry, they will be lucky to keep $100 for canteen money!!! His lawyer there in the trial made like $200 million off him and I thought he was a sleaze just like I thought Johnny Cockroach was in the OJ trial, putting everyone on trial instead of MJ and OJ, especially Cockroach, making Mark Furhman out to be this big racist and he had no clue who was dead at the condo until another detective found ID on Ron and in a purse they found Nicole's so why would he have planted evidence and called him the N word?? He had no beefs with OJ, he said he actually liked him until this happened???? No that Cockroach was slick right from his Armani suits to his $2,000 loafers and he too got a big chunk of OJ's fortune, but he died what 6-7 years later was it? I actually declared it "DEAD COCKROACH DAY!!!! And both of these men were criminals and now one, who did not have enough money in the world to get him off the Vegas charges and he is in prison for least 15 years and that suits me just fine!!! As for MJ, he got judged in the end by our Lord as he knows the whole truth.

Seashell
07-20-2009, 03:28 AM
You got it right again! and yep this nonsense about the murder of MJ what a load of bullcrap he got his just desserts.
Nice to read you Wind! :rose: