O.J. Simpson to discuss killings [Archive] - Crime Library Message Boards

gemsbmw

11-15-2006, 07:50 AM

tazzybaby

11-15-2006, 07:56 AM

The only thing I didn't expect was the interview.

I wonder what Galanter will say now. :shrug:

I guess we will see him on every talk show...

But Galanter vows, "If anyone comes out with such a book, I'll go on every talk show and call it crap."

:punch:

martin II

11-15-2006, 10:51 AM

Originally posted by tazzybaby
The only thing I didn't expect was the interview.

I wonder what Galanter will say now. :shrug:

I guess we will see him on every talk show...

But Galanter vows, "If anyone comes out with such a book, I'll go on every talk show and call it crap."

:punch:
tazzy hi
He did say that.
MARTIN ii

cryostate

11-15-2006, 11:42 AM

I am disgusted by this publicity stunt and cannot understand where he is coming from. Is he going to really tell us how we "would have" committed the crime? Even if he did not do it (and he did), how sick is that to put yourself into the mind of a killer and tell us what you would have done? I wish he would go away, because he has lost all sense of credibility in our society.

Gaelic_Lass

11-15-2006, 12:27 PM

Originally posted by cryostate
I am disgusted by this publicity stunt and cannot understand where he is coming from. Is he going to really tell us how we "would have" committed the crime? Even if he did not do it (and he did), how sick is that to put yourself into the mind of a killer and tell us what you would have done? I wish he would go away, because he has lost all sense of credibility in our society.

I agree, this is typical of his sick mind. Makes me think that he has spent a great deal of time over the past months/years thinking (or reliving) this gruesome deed. What kind of mind would willingly want to relive all that horror?

My question is what type of financial gain is there in this, and how long will it take for the Goldman/Brown contingent to take this to court to stop him from reaping benefits? I hope they are in discussions NOW to keep him from gaining a cent off of this fiasco.

JMO

tazzybaby

11-15-2006, 12:34 PM

Originally posted by martin II

tazzy hi
He did say that.
MARTIN ii

Hi Martin,

I know. So, I wonder why he lied?

:shrug:

martin II

11-15-2006, 01:18 PM

Originally posted by tazzybaby

Hi Martin,

I know. So, I wonder why he lied?

:shrug:

tazzy hi
seems like it but in that busness ,entertainmant, telling a lie is quite normal. sometimes people have good reasons for telling lies.

I don't believe any of it until it happens. Especially since FOX is involved and Judith Ragan. She played the other woman in a affair with the now ex n.y. city police commissioner (a felon i thinK) Bernie Klerick (sp)
martin II

tazzybaby

11-15-2006, 01:30 PM

Originally posted by martin II

tazzy hi
seems like it but in that busness ,entertainmant, telling a lie is quite normal. sometimes people have good reasons for telling lies.

I don't believe any of it until it happens. Especially since FOX is involved and Judith Ragan. She played the other woman in a affair with the now ex n.y. city police commissioner (a felon i thinK) Bernie Klerick (sp)
martin II

Martin,

In that business? Yale Galanter is in that business? I thought he was a defense attorney? I will never believe another word he says.

Well, you didn't believe it was true before. Turns out, the National Enquirer isn't as deceptive as Yale Galanter and his murderous client.

OJ is the lowest of the low.

limakey

11-15-2006, 01:51 PM

Taz,

Yale would not be the first lawyer or advisor not to know of their client's plan until it was too late. Perfect example, Princess Diana's advisor, Patrick Jepson (sp?)--he quit after she did that TV interview.

I can't imagine he would go on TV and say that if he knew what was happening. Remember, Gloria Allred ditched the Brown family after they sold private mementos of Nicole's life. It happens.

tazzybaby

11-15-2006, 02:10 PM

Originally posted by limakey
Taz,

Yale would not be the first lawyer or advisor not to know of their client's plan until it was too late. Perfect example, Princess Diana's advisor, Patrick Jepson (sp?)--he quit after she did that TV interview.

I can't imagine he would go on TV and say that if he knew what was happening. Remember, Gloria Allred ditched the Brown family after they sold private mementos of Nicole's life. It happens.

This is not the first time this has happened with these two. And, he said he would go on all the talk shows and call it a lie (or to repeat his words call it crap). He knows better than to say something like that.

So, I still can't ever believe Yale Galanter again. Since "oj doesn't tell him the truth".

Kate Sachel

11-15-2006, 02:22 PM

Perhaps Fred Goldman should do a follow-up interview and title it "If I Ever Killed OJ, Here's How I'd Do It".

Kate

CalifMermaid

11-15-2006, 02:29 PM

Originally posted by Kate Sachel
Perhaps Fred Goldman should do a follow-up interview and title it "If I Ever Killed OJ, Here's How I'd Do It".

Kate

:beer: I'll buy the book it if he ever wrote it!

martin II

11-15-2006, 02:36 PM

Originally posted by tazzybaby

Martin,

In that business? Yale Galanter is in that business? I thought he was a defense attorney? I will never believe another word he says.

Well, you didn't believe it was true before. Turns out, the National Enquirer isn't as deceptive as Yale Galanter and his murderous client.

OJ is the lowest of the low.

tazzy hi

I really didn't believe it mainly because saying IF I DID IT for many will be a confession of in fact i did it.

But then no one offered me $3.5 million to put my name on such a tease.
martin II

martin II

11-15-2006, 02:38 PM

Originally posted by tazzybaby

This is not the first time this has happened with these two. And, he said he would go on all the talk shows and call it a lie (or to repeat his words call it crap). He knows better than to say something like that.

So, I still can't ever believe Yale Galanter again. Since "oj doesn't tell him the truth".

TAZZY
It may be that Galanter did not know.
i wonder who the producer is .
martin II

Mashey46

11-15-2006, 02:39 PM

Originally posted by GrrlPwer
The two-part interview, titled "O.J. Simpson: If I Did It, Here's How It Happened," will air Nov. 27 and Nov. 29, the TV network said.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061115/ap_on_en_tv/simpson_interview :eek:

I wonder if OJ understands that there is no limitation on being charged with murder...if there is more evidence...wonder if......this somehow could implicate him? OJ have you checked with your attorney b/4 releasing this?

While I really haven't seen this b/4, this brings me back to what Nancy Grace has been saying, saying and saying....'they just can't keep quiet when talking about the crime they committed.' While I was quite convinced OJ was fairly acquitted..now, I have to take a closer look at his guilt.

bandit's mom

11-15-2006, 02:46 PM

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Kate Sachel
Perhaps Fred Goldman should do a follow-up interview and title it "If I Ever Killed OJ, Here's How I'd Do It".

Kate [/QUOTE

And what jury would ever convict him?

bandit's mom

11-15-2006, 02:49 PM

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Mashey46
[B]

I wonder if OJ understands that there is no limitation on being charged with murder...if there is more evidence...wonder if......this somehow could implicate him? OJ have you checked with your attorney b/4 releasing this?

OJ was charged and acquitted. He can drop the How I would
have done it crap and just call it like it is, How I did do it,
and there's not one thing that can be done to him. Double
Jeapordy applies. It's possible he could be charged with perjury
for depo's given during the civil trial, but that's it. He can tell
the world he murdered two people in cold blood and he will
remain a free man.

tazzybaby

11-15-2006, 02:55 PM

Originally posted by Kate Sachel
Perhaps Fred Goldman should do a follow-up interview and title it "If I Ever Killed OJ, Here's How I'd Do It".

Kate

:beer:

sassylassy

11-15-2006, 03:35 PM

Originally posted by martin II

tazzy hi

I really didn't believe it mainly because saying IF I DID IT for many will be a confession of in fact i did it.

But then no one offered me $3.5 million to put my name on such a tease.
martin II

They say money makes people do crazy things.

If O.J Simpson was paid $3.5 million then I understand why he wrote the book- that is some Pay Day:beer:

tazzybaby

11-15-2006, 03:52 PM

Originally posted by sassylassy

They say money makes people do crazy things.

If O.J Simpson was paid $3.5 million then I understand why he wrote the book- that is some Pay Day:beer:

And, you think it's a good thing for him to make money off of his childrens' mothers murder? That's blood money.

sassylassy

11-15-2006, 04:05 PM

Originally posted by tazzybaby

And, you think it's a good thing for him to make money off of his childrens' mothers murder? That's blood money.

I never said it was good. I said I under-stand why.

Money.

martin II

11-15-2006, 04:15 PM

Originally posted by tazzybaby

And, you think it's a good thing for him to make money off of his childrens' mothers murder? That's blood money.

tazzy hi

That may be how you look at it. The interviewer, publisher, FOX,
ratail book store and the promoter are also involved in this effort.
Everyone is trying to make big bucks in this deal.

If it turns out to be true that he is getting $3.5 mill i am sure that money will go to a off shore account and out of reach of any creditors.imo
martin II

Kate Sachel

11-15-2006, 04:24 PM

From CCN:

Judith Regan, whose ReganBooks imprint is publishing the book, declined to reveal further details of the book's contents.

"This is an historic case, and I consider this his confession," Regan told The Associated Press. She also refused to say what Simpson is being paid for the book but said he came to her with the idea.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/TV/11/15/simpsoninterview.ap/index.html

Kate

Kate Sachel

11-15-2006, 04:26 PM

Originally posted by Kate Sachel
From CCN:

Judith Regan, whose ReganBooks imprint is publishing the book, declined to reveal further details of the book's contents.

"This is an historic case, and I consider this his confession," Regan told The Associated Press. She also refused to say what Simpson is being paid for the book but said he came to her with the idea.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/TV/11/15/simpsoninterview.ap/index.html

Kate

So it was his own sick idea ... I should have known.

Even his publisher considers this to be his confession.

Kate

sassylassy

11-15-2006, 04:37 PM

I don't think this is a confession from O.J Simpson. I think this is all media hype!

socaldiva

11-15-2006, 04:47 PM

Originally posted by martin II
[B]*snip*

The interviewer, publisher, FOX,
ratail book store and the promoter are also involved in this effort.
Everyone is trying to make big bucks in this deal.

"Everyone" isn't the parent of Sydney & Justin & it appears it was his idea. What's your excuse now?

sassylassy

11-15-2006, 04:51 PM

Originally posted by socaldiva

"Everyone" isn't the parent of Sydney & Justin & it appears it was his idea. What's your excuse now?

This isn't the first book O.J Simpson wrote.

socaldiva

11-15-2006, 05:10 PM

Originally posted by sassylassy

This isn't the first book O.J Simpson wrote.

Yes, I'm aware of that. What's your point?

martin II

11-15-2006, 05:17 PM

Originally posted by sassylassy
I don't think this is a confession from O.J Simpson. I think this is all media hype!

sassy
i cannot believe that J Regan is being critical of someones behavior.IMO
Martin II

martin II

11-15-2006, 05:22 PM

Originally posted by sassylassy
I don't think this is a confession from O.J Simpson. I think this is all media hype!

correct

It is a business deal between several groups .if one wants to make the natives restless, ( and sell books) this is the subject.imo

martin II

socaldiva

11-15-2006, 05:24 PM

Originally posted by martin II
*snip*
i cannot believe that J Regan is being critical of someones behavior.IMO
Martin II

Why because you think she had an affair? What a joke. Simpson had multiple affairs, beat his wife, stole cable and murdered two people . Get real.

daghda

11-15-2006, 05:24 PM

Originally posted by socaldiva
"Everyone" isn't the parent of Sydney & Justin & it appears it was his idea. What's your excuse now?

According to O J Simpson's attorney (just on Catherine Crier) his kids are behind the project 100%. :beer:

O J Simpson isn't confessing, he's merely speculating on how he would have approached the difficult task of commiting the perfect murder.

Daghda

socaldiva

11-15-2006, 05:26 PM

Originally posted by daghda
*snip*

According to O J Simpson's attorney (just on Catherine Crier) his kids are behind the project 100%. :beer:

We've already seen Gallanter lie & what would you expect him to say in this instance?. They had to have known that question was coming.

socaldiva

11-15-2006, 05:27 PM

Originally posted by daghda
*snip*
O J Simpson isn't confessing, he's merely speculating on how he would have approached the difficult task of commiting the perfect murder.
Daghda

He didn't "commit" the perfect murder. Far from it. He left evidence everywhere. He just got lucky with some boneheaded jurors. imo

daghda

11-15-2006, 05:32 PM

Originally posted by socaldiva
We've already seen Gallanter lie & what would you expect him to say in this instance?. They had to have known that question was coming.

All I can say is I'm really looking forward to the interview, and I will purchase the book - with the knowledge of course that the Browns and Goldman's won't see a red cent :patriot:

Daghda

socaldiva

11-15-2006, 05:34 PM

Originally posted by daghda

All I can say is I'm really looking forward to the interview, and I will purchase the book - with the knowledge of course that the Browns and Goldman's won't see a red cent :patriot:
Daghda

Good for you. I do find it odd that you use the patriotic icon in support of denying the Goldman's what was awarded to them in a court of law.

sassylassy

11-15-2006, 05:39 PM

Originally posted by socaldiva

Yes, I'm aware of that. What's your point?

No point, just a fact.

PJ Muller

11-15-2006, 05:40 PM

He didn't "commit" the perfect murder. Far from it. He left evidence everywhere. He just got lucky with some boneheaded jurors. imo

That's probably the reason for the new book. He's had plenty of time to rethink how he could done it even better.

daghda

11-15-2006, 05:40 PM

Originally posted by socaldiva

Good for you. I do find it odd that you use the patriotic icon in support of denying the Goldman's what was awarded to them in a court of law.

Your the third person this month to question my patriotism :mad:

Once on the Duke University Rape Scandal thread, and once on Massachusetts vs McCowen...hmmm

Daghda

sassylassy

11-15-2006, 05:41 PM

Originally posted by daghda

According to O J Simpson's attorney (just on Catherine Crier) his kids are behind the project 100%. :beer:

Daghda

Wow- His kids are behind him!
is any one shocked?

socaldiva

11-15-2006, 05:45 PM

Originally posted by sassylassy

Wow- His kids are behind him!
is any one shocked?

Who says he's telling the truth? He lied about there being no book.

daghda

11-15-2006, 05:49 PM

Originally posted by sassylassy

Wow- His kids are behind him!
is any one shocked?

No they love their father and clearly believe him innocent :)

Daghda

SlipperySlope

11-15-2006, 05:50 PM

Originally posted by 2L8 4A D8

Who cares? Unless OJ is going to flat-out confess, I am not interested in anything he has to say or do!

JMO and MOO!! [/B]

I could not agree with you more!

It will be a cold day in hell before I watch that interview or read that book - it's all money grubbing trash!!!

:beer:

socaldiva

11-15-2006, 05:51 PM

Originally posted by daghda

No they love their father and clearly believe him innocent :)
Daghda

Sure, that's why Justin wrote a story about a fictional murder when he was 8 yrs old & his "dad" was the killer.

sassylassy

11-15-2006, 05:51 PM

Originally posted by daghda

No they love their father and clearly believe him innocent :)

Daghda

:beer: I agree.

martin II

11-15-2006, 05:51 PM

Originally posted by sassylassy

Wow- His kids are behind him!
is any one shocked?

sassy

OJ and the kids may not be taking it as serious as some here are. especially if they believe oj did not kill nicole. imo

martin II

SlipperySlope

11-15-2006, 05:52 PM

Originally posted by sassylassy

Wow- His kids are behind him!
is any one shocked?

Better for them to be behind him than in front of him....if you know what I'm sayin'.
:D

sassylassy

11-15-2006, 05:58 PM

Originally posted by martin II

sassy

OJ and the kids may not be taking it as serious as some here are. especially if they believe oj did not kill nicole. imo

martin II

this is true.

sassylassy

11-15-2006, 05:59 PM

Originally posted by SlipperySlope

Better for them to be behind him than in front of him....if you know what I'm sayin'.
:D

I guess. either way -they are still with him.

socaldiva

11-15-2006, 06:01 PM

Originally posted by SlipperySlope

Better for them to be behind him than in front of him....if you know what I'm sayin'.
:D

No kidding! I don't know how those poor kids ever managed to sleep a wink in the house with him. Gawd.

sassylassy

11-15-2006, 06:02 PM

Originally posted by socaldiva

No kidding! I don't know how those poor kids ever managed to sleep a wink in the house with him. Gawd.

Please. if that was the case why are they still living there??

socaldiva

11-15-2006, 06:04 PM

Originally posted by sassylassy

Please. if that was the case why are they still living there??

Money. How do you expect them to support themselves without him? I don't know that Sydney lives with him. I thought she was away at college.

martin II

11-15-2006, 06:06 PM

Originally posted by sassylassy

Please. if that was the case why are they still living there??

sassy
oj kids seem to be doing as well or better than the average teenagers and it is obvious that they love their dad.imo
martin II

sassylassy

11-15-2006, 06:06 PM

Originally posted by socaldiva

Money. How do you expect them to support themselves without him? I don't know that Sydney lives with him. I thought she was away at college.

They have trust fund money, they could access it.
or they could live with the Brown's.

sassylassy

11-15-2006, 06:07 PM

Originally posted by martin II

sassy
oj kids seem to be doing as well or better than the average teenagers and it is obvious that they love their dad.imo
martin II

I agree. They seem to have turned out alright to me.

socaldiva

11-15-2006, 06:14 PM

Originally posted by sassylassy

They have trust fund money, they could access it.
or they could live with the Brown's.

Who says they can access the trust money? Who's going to pay the college tuition at the Browns?

TuscanDreams

11-15-2006, 06:17 PM

Is OJ desperate for money or did he do this because he HAS to have attention on his narcisstic self?

OJ got away with murder. Now, he needs to shut up before the DA figures out something to charge him with. It's double jeopardy to be charged with murder twice, but a civil rights prosecution isn't part of the jeopardy.

OJ needs to take his white bronco and ride slowly into the ocean.

socaldiva

11-15-2006, 06:18 PM

Originally posted by TuscanDreams
*snp*
OJ needs to take his white bronco and ride slowly into the ocean.

:lol:

TuscanDreams

11-15-2006, 06:18 PM

Originally posted by sassylassy
Wow- His kids are behind him!
is any one shocked?

Not believing that one until I hear it from the mouth of Sydney and Justin.

socaldiva

11-15-2006, 06:21 PM

Originally posted by TuscanDreams

Not believing that one until I hear it from the mouth of Sydney and Justin.

Same here & it doesn't count if OJ is standing behind them :o

martin II

11-15-2006, 06:22 PM

Originally posted by sassylassy

They have trust fund money, they could access it.
or they could live with the Brown's.

SASSY
Sdyne is in school in Boston and comes home frequantly on weekends. The boy is a local football star at school.

If some of the money goes to the kids that would be great as it will give them financial security.
martin ii

PJ Muller

11-15-2006, 07:01 PM

Please. if that was the case why are they still living there??

OJ killed Nicole. Plain and simple. She even predicted it, telling others that if something happened to her, it was OJ behind it. She KNEW.

To kill the mother, then raise the kids like a noble widower in the face of unjust attack on his integrity would appeal to someone like OJ. It would please and flatter his ego greatly. Anyone who kill his wife like that would also go on to act just like OJ. And I've no doubt he is probably pretty good to his children. He slaughtered their mother and a possible suitor and so there's no need for rage at the children. He's only a monster to those who see through him and call him on it, not innocents who 'believe in daddy'. As for the children, a daddy 'under attack' in the media is better than no parent at all; they were wee little ones when this happened. Of course they can not believe he killed their mother. Maybe its best that they continue to think so.
OJ wrote this book because 1) this way, he can kill Nicole all over again 2) hurt the Browns/Goldmans again 3) thumb his nose at a public that no longer hero-worships him.
And why not? He got away with murder in the first place.

socaldiva

11-15-2006, 07:13 PM

Originally posted by PJ Muller
*snip*

And I've no doubt he is probably pretty good to his children.

What about the 911 call Sydney made saying he's an ***#### & "he doesn't love us"?

socaldiva

11-15-2006, 07:16 PM

Originally posted by martin II
*snip*
The boy is a local football star at school.

Do you have a link for this?

Kate Sachel

11-17-2006, 10:21 PM

I have seen several remarks about how his children support him with this "project" and I'd appreciate it if any one of those individuals could provide me with the source of this information, because I have searched all over and thus far have been unable to verify the suggestion that his children are okay with all of this.

Links please? Or else, which interview etc. that it was heard on.

Thank you in advance.

Kate

Kate Sachel

11-17-2006, 10:30 PM

I had the rather unfortunate experience of viewing a clip from his upcoming interview. He is asked to read aloud from the chapter that discusses "that evening", and he begins but then stops in tears and says "I can't do this no more, I can't do this to my kids, I can't have them hear me say this".

**Ahem** Are you serious? You only thought of that in the middle of reading a sentence detailing how you would have gone about slaughtering their mother? You didn't have the insight or inclination to perhaps think of this prior to writing the book or giving the interview?

Goodness, I'd love to hear people continue to argue about what a wonderful and caring father he is. :rolleyes:

Kate

tazzybaby

11-20-2006, 07:29 AM

Originally posted by Kate Sachel
I had the rather unfortunate experience of viewing a clip from his upcoming interview. He is asked to read aloud from the chapter that discusses "that evening", and he begins but then stops in tears and says "I can't do this no more, I can't do this to my kids, I can't have them hear me say this".

**Ahem** Are you serious? You only thought of that in the middle of reading a sentence detailing how you would have gone about slaughtering their mother? You didn't have the insight or inclination to perhaps think of this prior to writing the book or giving the interview?

Goodness, I'd love to hear people continue to argue about what a wonderful and caring father he is. :rolleyes:

Kate

Hi Kate,

I saw that clip but didn't know why he was "upset". It just gets better and better. :mad: