PDA

View Full Version : Today, 9/10 black's agree "oj probably is guilty or involved"


Pages : 1 2 3 [4]

martin II
08-06-2008, 05:53 AM
martin, when I opened the board to catch up on posts, william's post was the one containing porno. Now, whether either of you like it, that is the fact. william knows how the 'quote' works in responding to posts -- he does it almost everytime he posts and since he has been borderline offensive in the past, I do indeed believe he knew what he was doing. I'm done with this conversation.

A poster posted porn, william posted a reply which caused the porn to be reposted to show what william was postin his negative reaction to. SO what is the problem.


You have made a false serious claim and when your claim is attacked as false, you are now ready to 'END THE CONVERSATION" imo

martin II
08-06-2008, 07:10 AM
martin, when I opened the board to catch up on posts, william's post was the one containing porno. Now, whether either of you like it, that is the fact. william knows how the 'quote' works in responding to posts -- he does it almost everytime he posts and since he has been borderline offensive in the past, I do indeed believe he knew what he was doing. I'm done with this conversation.

weezer
I think when you opened the board there was a post before williams post made by the original poster of the pictures.imo

William Anthony
08-06-2008, 08:56 AM
A poster posted porn, william posted a reply which caused the porn to be reposted to show what william was postin his negative reaction to. SO what is the problem.


You have made a false serious claim and when your claim is attacked as false, you are now ready to 'END THE CONVERSATION" imo

To quote that poster because it is fitting in this situation, "a reckless disregard for the truth shows the character of the person."

SlowHandSam
08-06-2008, 09:20 AM
To quote that poster because it is fitting in this situation, "a reckless disregard for the truth shows the character of the person."

Again, enough already.

Not all of us had the misfortune to see the original post.

The reply is what a lot of us saw.

MOVE ON already. You are OFF TOPIC and disrupting the board.

SlowHandSam
08-06-2008, 09:45 AM
The poster who made the false accusations against me was off topic but you did not tell that poster that. Do not tell me what to do as you do not have that authority. Perhaps, you should move on out of the state in which you have lived so that you can learn something about respect, civility, equality and honesty, imho. When was the last time prior to this post that you added something of substance to this thread?

You're OT.

And you're attacking.

And you've derailed this thread.

William Anthony
08-06-2008, 10:06 AM
You're OT.

And you're attacking.

And you've derailed this thread.

The poster who made the false post against me took this thread off topic, derailed it and attacked me. You are being unequal, imho. You nor anyone else has posted anything of substance on this thread after my last on topic post, which remained and was not responded to for quite some time until the thread was taken off topic, derailed and I was attacked by another poster. I appreciate your new found interest in the subject matter of this thread, so why don't you post something of substance to which poster might respond if they feel so inclined.

martin II
08-06-2008, 11:27 AM
Again, enough already.

Not all of us had the misfortune to see the original post.

The reply is what a lot of us saw.

MOVE ON already. You are OFF TOPIC and disrupting the board.

The original posters pictures were not deleted when william made his reply.
They remained until the mod deleted all.

Suzee10
08-23-2008, 02:17 AM
Alan Dershowitz: "I think for some of the jurors, Barry Scheck gave them the intellectual and the moral permission to vote their heart. They wanted to vote acquittal. Barry showed them how to; Johnnie told them why to. …"

And we all know that their decision was not based on the evidence or facts of the case.


Hi Fbgweezer,

I haven't seen you guys for a while. Not so many people here anymore. I guess everyone is gearing up for the next simpson saga, lol!

I totally agree with your quote concerning Dershowitz and Scheck, they gave their permission for the jury to let simpson go.

Suzee10

William Anthony
08-23-2008, 06:32 AM
Hi Fbgweezer,

I haven't seen you guys for a while. Not so many people here anymore. I guess everyone is gearing up for the next simpson saga, lol!

I totally agree with your quote concerning Dershowitz and Scheck, they gave their permission for the jury to let simpson go.

Suzee10

I agree. Scheck took apart the scientific evidence and JC took apart the alleged investigation.

martin II
08-23-2008, 07:05 AM
Hi Fbgweezer,

I haven't seen you guys for a while. Not so many people here anymore. I guess everyone is gearing up for the next simpson saga, lol!

I totally agree with your quote concerning Dershowitz and Scheck, they gave their permission for the jury to let simpson go.

Suzee10

I think oj was found not guilty because of how the defense proved that the prosecution did not prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt and the judges instruction to the jury.

weezer
08-24-2008, 02:31 PM
Hi Fbgweezer,

I haven't seen you guys for a while. Not so many people here anymore. I guess everyone is gearing up for the next simpson saga, lol!

I totally agree with your quote concerning Dershowitz and Scheck, they gave their permission for the jury to let simpson go.

Suzee10

hey suzee -- not so many of us post anymore -- it gets to be a bit tiring dealing with some of the NG's and their outrageous, inaccurate, and belligerent posts. LOL

the vegas saga should be at least entertaining -- I'm not sure how many lives orenthal has/had but I think he has lived his nine so hopefully he will finally be held accountable for his ways.

William Anthony
08-25-2008, 06:49 AM
Some things are more laughable than others, such as the kettle calling the pot black.

William Anthony
08-29-2008, 06:59 AM
Some things are more laughable than others, such as the kettle calling the pot black.

Today, I heard on fox that the commentators felt BO's speech was angry. I saw the speech as somber, humble and serious in parts. I think this is another example of how things are viewed differently, depending on the viewer. This relates to the perception of those mentioned in this thread.